What's new

Uri shelling: Two army men succumb to injuries

Ans Ishaq

FULL MEMBER

New Recruit

Joined
Aug 9, 2014
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
LOC Update: Heavy firing has started between Pakistan and Indian Army at Neza Pir Sector too. Pak Army is targeting Indian Posts.
 
LOC Update: Heavy firing has started between Pakistan and Indian Army at Neza Pir Sector too. Pak Army is targeting Indian Posts.
Its a routine matter!!! Whats new?
 
why does indian army keep doing this. what do they achieve out of this ?
They just want to keep Pakistan busy on LOC so Pakistan couldnt focus on Balochistan and FATA and its resources remain stretched and secondly they think that by heating up LOC they will somehow also deter the freedom movement in IOK
 
LoC wouldn't exist in the first place if India didn't rush in to defend a genocidal Maharaja.

if Jinnah hadn't tried to act smart and send in the so called irregulars the Rajah wouldn't have had to sign up with India. It is the same story then as now - you send terrorists India send troops to push them back out.

And why assume that we always initiated firing FOR RETALIATION
It could be anyone

because you (Pakistan) always cry India hit back first!
 
if Jinnah hadn't tried to act smart and send in the so called irregulars the Rajah wouldn't have had to sign up with India.

They weren't irregulars lol. People were incensed after seeing refugees streaming from Kashmir with stories of the massacres being carried out by the Maharaja's government. Every dead Indian monkey on the LoC is another black mark on the record of your partition-era leaders.
 
They weren't irregulars lol. People were incensed after seeing refugees streaming from Kashmir with stories of the massacres being carried out by the Maharaja's government. Every dead Indian monkey on the LoC is another black mark on the record of your partition-era leaders.
that's what people like you imagine in your stupor. not true.

We have same blames on you India always open fire on LOC

yup and that's how this thing goes on endlessly
 
if Jinnah hadn't tried to act smart and send in the so called irregulars the Rajah wouldn't have had to sign up with India. It is the same story then as now - you send terrorists India send troops to push them back out.
Name one so called terrorists that's caught by Indian terrorist occupiers in IOK and he accepted that's he is coming from Pakistan you have only to blames but haven't any solid proofs to prove the World
 
if Jinnah hadn't tried to act smart and send in the so called irregulars the Rajah wouldn't have had to sign up with India. It is the same story then as now - you send terrorists India send troops to push them back out.
What were State of Patiala's forces doing in Kashmir?

They were there before the arrival of Tribals.

Again, tribals went in after Maharaja had already started the massacre. Your troops, on the other hand, went in to defend his autocratic rule. Avoid defending the indefensible just because its your country which is the oppressor.
you send terrorists India send troops to push them back out
The only terrorist was your army; and it still is.
 
if Jinnah hadn't tried to act smart and send in the so called irregulars the Rajah wouldn't have had to sign up with India.

That's nonsensical for two reasons:

First and foremost, these irregulars volunteered on their own accord. It's not like Jinnah would have been able to stop them, I'm sure you know of the zeal that many of us can have when it comes to warfare.

Secondly, the Maharaja's intentions from the get go were to not join Pakistan, hence why he engaged in his crackdowns upon the Muslim population. The subsequent intervention from Pakistani paramilitaries as well as eventually the army itself were perfectly justified in light of this.
 
Name one so called terrorists that's caught by Indian terrorist occupiers in IOK and he accepted that's he is coming from Pakistan you have only to blames but haven't any solid proofs to prove the World

this question is so wrong it can only come from total confusion.
1. no such thing as Indian terrorist occupiers
2. the terrorists from Pakistan will not accept they are terrorists - because they are killed not caught
3. there is nothing to prove - it has been quite obvious

What were State of Patiala's forces doing in Kashmir?

They were there before the arrival of Tribals.

Again, tribals went in after Maharaja had already started the massacre. Your troops, on the other hand, went in to defend his autocratic rule. Avoid defending the indefensible just because its your country which is the oppressor.

The only terrorist was your army; and it still is.

your opinions, wishful thoughts and invalid versions of history need not be countered - they are just invalid. Don't meant any disrespect to you personally but these are very obviousl and well known facts and some of you just don't want to admit your past leaders' screw ups.

That's nonsensical for two reasons:

First and foremost, these irregulars volunteered on their own accord. It's not like Jinnah would have been able to stop them, I'm sure you know of the zeal that many of us can have when it comes to warfare.

Secondly, the Maharaja's intentions from the get go were to not join Pakistan, hence why he engaged in his crackdowns upon the Muslim population. The subsequent intervention from Pakistani paramilitaries as well as eventually the army itself were perfectly justified in light of this.

well you call it nonsensical because it doesn't help your case. Truth is truth, you're not allowed your own version of it.
 
Back
Top Bottom