UP: Muslim Families Put up ‘For Sale’ Signs Outside Homes in Shamli, Some Flee, Citing Police Brutal

[ChennaiDude]

Lol. You are so naive.

Maybe I am- But again what is the solution you propose (I meant as in your opinion)- The Indian Muslims are hurting man- You guys are the majority, show them that you guys care!

 

[Shantanu_Left]

Really? I never knew.

Excellent suggestions ... now since you claimed this .... lets hear your views on changes you want to see for Muslims

You are an infidel. He doesn't have to explain his changes for Muslims to you. You're not part of the club. Members only please.

You can create your own Hindu club, and learn to mind your own business.

 

[Protest_again]

You will see, Sanghi cowboy.



You know jack about Islam and Islamic beliefs, and still running your mouth on a topic you don't understand.

How would you like it if Muslims start speculating whether Ram and Sita were incestuous siblings, and whether Brahma masturbated to create Saraswati or whatever.

Didn't like it? UCC is an interference in Islamic deeply held values. How long do you think they will take it sitting down? Government can pass it on paper all they can. There will be a major backlash if it's enforced.

Lol. I asked you a simple question, why isn't there a blood bath in UK where UCC is the law? Once it's a law, they can cry a river nothing can stop it from being enforced.

I couldn't care less about their beliefs.

 

[ChennaiDude]

If you have balls, come and take it. Otherwise shut the fu(k up. INTERNET HERO. REAL LIFE DESERTER.

- PRTP GWD

Partition is not an option...leave him he is radical.

 

[jaatram]

You are an infidel. He doesn't have to explain his changes for Muslims to you. You're not part of the club.

Yeah but why Muslim law board said triple talaq was integral part of sharia? Are they ignorant about Islam as I am?

 

[Shantanu_Left]

Lol. I asked you a simple question, why isn't there a blood bath in UK where UCC is the law? Once it's a law, they can cry a river nothing can stop it from being enforced.

I couldn't care less about their beliefs.

There is no "UCC" in England. It is officially a Christian country. British Muslims do have separate Shariah courts all over the UK. You clearly don't follow the news enough.

The White Brits don't interfere in the internal matters of brown people.

 

[xeuss]

Yeah but why Muslim law board said triple talaq was integral part of sharia? Are they ignorant about Islam as I am?

You can email them and ask them:
http://aimplboard.in/board-members.php

There is no "UCC" in England. It is officially a Christian country. British Muslims do have separate Shariah courts all over the UK. You clearly don't follow the news enough.

The White Brits don't interfere in the internal matters of brown people.

Why is Sanghi interfering in the "internal matter of white people"?

 

[Shantanu_Left]

You can email them and ask them:
http://aimplboard.in/board-members.php

He clearly doesn't understand nuances and context very well.

 

[jaatram]

You can email them and ask them:
http://aimplboard.in/board-members.php

But the cockwomble here said “No Muslim will accept a non-Shariah compliant marriage code which affects their internal lives.“

 

[Shantanu_Left]

But the cockwomble here said “No Muslim will accept a non-Shariah compliant marriage code which affects their internal lives.“

Are you visually impaired or challenged in any other way? Go back to what I exactly wrote in that paragraph. I'm not doing your homework for you.

What I really meant was that Triple Talaq was already on its expiry path among Indian Muslims, similar to other countries such as Pakistan, etc. They would have done it on their own even if the Indian courts did not persist.

But other aspects of Shariah are a different matter. They will be seen as a direct interference in Islamic way of life in India.

 

[Protest_again]

Maybe I am- But again what is the solution you propose (I meant as in your opinion)- The Indian Muslims are hurting man- You guys are the majority, show them that you guys care!

India was never secular, the word 'secular' was added to Indian preamble only in 1976 by the congress for their vote bank politics. Because sangh was giving it a tough time. Indian constitution was secular in spirit that was derived from Hindu ethos. Indian constitution framers didn't take muslim aspirations into account at all. If you read the discussions in constituent assembly at the time, entire constitution was matched to the Hindu principles. Members of constituent assembly quoted Hindu scriptures for justification of a law, not Quran not Bible. Today we have likes of you who wants to dilute the Hinduness of the constitution for god knows why.

Also they explicit asked the future governments to work towards UCC through the directive principles. And today we have that idiot @Shantanu_Left threatening blood bath in streets for wanting to implement our constitution makers vision.

I want the true secularism in India ie., 'one for all' and not 'each for their own'. India first, religion second. People like Shantanu are dime a dozen on the streets. He could only bark on the internet but in reality he would run with his tail in his butt cheeks.

 

[Shantanu_Left]

India was never secular, the word 'secular' was added to Indian preamble only in 1976 by the congress for their vote bank politics. Because sangh was giving it a tough time. Indian constitution was secular in spirit that was derived from Hindu ethos. Indian constitution framers didn't take muslim aspirations into account at all. If you read the discussions in constituent assembly at the time, entire constitution was matched to the Hindu principles. Members of constituent assembly quoted Hindu scriptures for justification of a law, not Quran not Bible. Today we have likes of you who wants to dilute the Hinduness of the constitution for god knows why.

Also they explicit asked the future governments to work towards UCC through the directive principles. And today we have that idiot @Shantanu_Left threatening blood bath in streets for wanting to implement our constitution makers vision.

I want the true secularism in India ie., 'one for all' and not 'each for their own'. India first, religion second. People like Shantanu are dime a dozen on the streets. He could only bark on the internet but in reality he would run with his tail in his butt cheeks.

India's Constitution, for the most part, follows the Government of India Act (1935) and other British era rules and guidelines. So, it is essentially a British document at its core. That would make the ethos of the Indian Constitution somewhat "Christian" as the Brits followed Christianity during their rule in India.

India's Constitution was never "Hindu" for the country's 70 years of existence. That is why all your RSS faggots want to change the Constitution. There is nothing Hindu about modern India, it was originally conceived as a SECULAR nation by Nehru vis-a-vis an Islamic nation called Pakistan.

Sorry to bust your bubble but even as of 2020, India is not a "Hindu" country according to its founders. Of course your RSS leaders are trying hard, but only time will tell how much they succeed.

 

[The_Showstopper]

People like @xeuss and @The_Showstopper also toe the Pakistani line and dis on India. They continuously put their religion before the country. Many times they skirt dangerously close towards separatism. I don't remember what their views are on Kashmir or Ladakh but going by their conduct I won't be surprised if it matches with Pakistanis.

Then there is a person like @AfrazulMandal who is a full time separatist. He is hiding in Australia. Recently he was thrashed left right and centre on Twitter so he now comes here to blow his steam. The Pakistanis obviously welcome him with open arms.

Apart from these there are enablers like @Shantanu_Left who give cover fire and of course @Joe Shearer who is their mentor.

I know that you believe in some secular leftist utopia but please don't give intellectual cover to the seperatists

LOL... Feku bhakts will now get to certify as to who to gets to be Indians.

 

[Protest_again]

India's Constitution, for the most part, follows the Government of India Act (1935) and other British era rules and guidelines. So, it is essentially a British document at its core. That would make the ethos of the Indian Constitution somewhat "Christian" as the Brits followed Christianity during their rule in India.

India's Constitution was never "Hindu" for the country's 70 years of existence. That is why all your RSS faggots want to change the Constitution. There is nothing Hindu about modern India, it was originally conceived as a SECULAR nation by Nehru vis-a-vis an Islamic nation called Pakistan.

Sorry to bust your bubble but even as of 2020, India is not a "Hindu" country according to its founders. Of course your RSS leaders are trying hard, but only time will tell how much they succeed.

No body wants to change the constitution. We all are happy the way it is. You'll see UCC and you'll see true secularism in India. All you leftist cohorts crying will be confined to internet and few articles here and there. Now go suck your thumb.

 

[Soumitra]

Ok, I will bite- lets say for the purpose of argument Muslims of India dont accept this proposal for UCC!- Have they accepted CAA or other pograms of BJP?- Has this stopped you guys from tying to implement?- So my question is whats stopping you now, scared that it may get accepted since it would be universal as per the law of the land, then what do you guys do then?

Who says they are not going to implement. They have already taken the first steps.

https://economictimes.indiatimes.co...-begin-soon/articleshow/64131234.cms?from=mdr


https://www.sundayguardianlive.com/news/law-commission-will-discuss-uniform-civil-code