What's new

“Unite Hindus and create division among Muslims”: BJP leader Subramanian Swamy

Do you think it's an India only problem?

https://www.cnbc.com/2017/04/10/the...within-the-next-18-months-economist-says.html

I'd consider your statement as a great piece of advice, specially when coming from the citizen of a nation which barely touched a growth rate of 5% over the last decade.


Right! every Tom dick and harry knows that Dow Jones is a inflated bubble which can burst anytime.

I am pointing to the fact that his d|ckhead hindu terrorist, who himself is predicting economic meltdown of his country which is by far the most serious issue, got time to spread venom against minorities of his country.

As for the status of your economy, even FT is reporting about it.

 
. .
Things which are too strong to change can be broken completely and just need an appropriate amount of push.
 
. . .
Can you imagine any muslim leader saying like these things in Bangladesh or Pakistan? Still bharat is secular.
 
. .
For a peaceful and loving world , human need to united not divided.

We must detest very form of extremism and love humanity, take and act on religion as constructive force not destructive force.

Swamay guy is nuts.
 
. .
Jo apnay Mulk k intelligence chief per allegations laga sakta ha wo kuch bhe kar sakta hai.
If we see the history even he is always against the Muslim community and has played its part in dividing them. Even if some hindu is considering peace with Muslim community he is not willing to let them do so like what he said back in 2008 when some indian columnists voiced their opinions in favor of peacefully surrendering kashmir to Pakistan.

"Phone tapping allegation[edit]

Swamy released a letter alleging that former intelligence chief had asked DoT to tap the phone of many politicians and businessmen in Karnataka,[40] the then Chief Minister, Ramakrishna Hegde resigned in 1988.[41] Hegde then filed a case against him in 1989 and 1990.[42][43][44]"

Views on Kashmir[edit]
In September 2008, Swamy stridently retorted against the contentions of some Indian columnists who voiced their opinions in favor of "peacefully" surrendering Kashmir to Pakistan. He said,

"I would say that the silent suffering majority of India wants none of this. The 'Kashmir issue,' in fact, can no more be solved by dialogue either with the Pakistanis or the Hurriyat, leave alone the constitutional impossibility of allowing it to secede. [...]Kashmir, in fact, is now our defining identity. It is a touchstone for our resolve to preserve our national integrity. The population of that State may be majority Muslim but the land and its history is predominantly Hindu. For our commitment to the survival of the ancient civilisation of India and the composite culture that secularists talk of, we have not only to win that coming inevitable war but also resolve never to part with Kashmir. [...]
Pakistanis often cite the United Nations resolutions on Kashmir to argue for a plebiscite. This obfuscates the fact of accession of the State to India. The legality of the Instrument of Accession signed in favour of India by the then Maharaja of J&K, Hari Singh, on 26 October 1947 has to prevail anyway.[126]


Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subramanian_Swamy
 
.
Inn which corner of the world are Muslims united? So that anybody may have to make any effort to decide them?
 
.
ar5ymz5_700b.jpg
 
.
Back
Top Bottom