UNHCR Chief: China can play key role in solving refugee crises

[dy1022]

UNHCR chief, FCUK OFF...

My take, only those with Chinese blood Overseas Chinese , with Confucian background East Asian, White Pretty Girls are allowed !!!

For others, we don't need any of them!!!

@Daniel808 @powastick @Chinese-Dragon @mike2000 is back @AndrewJin

 

[duhastmish]

It will be great if china can take some refugees. Strong laws and no religious practice might even be good for them.

Most Muslim refugees might find it hard with one child policy. Strong laws and no religious practice. But china will grab illegal of them from throats and force down the reality with a fist of fury.

 

[AndrewJin]

Lmao, in a country where foreign languages are incomprehensible and useless, how could non-Chinese refugees survive here? The last successful attempt was to accept thousands of Vietnamese refugees to settle in Southwest China.

 

[ohmrlobalobayeh]

UNHCR chief, FCUK OFF...

My take, only those with Chinese blood Overseas Chinese , with Confucian background East Asian, White Pretty Girls are allowed !!!

For others, we don't need any of them!!!

@Daniel808 @powastick @Chinese-Dragon @mike2000 is back @AndrewJin

Chinese blood = tick
Confucian background = tick

http://www.scmp.com/news/china/dipl...ling-open-its-pockets-not-borders-middle-east

China willing to open its pockets, but not borders, to Middle East refugees (means China donate $$$ to refugees = ok, host refugees = not ok)

Others argue that China is still a developing country that has done its job to help resolve crises in Syria and elsewhere

China will step up economic aid to help countries deal with the Syrian refugee crisis, but Beijing has no plan to provide shelter for refugees from the war-torn region, diplomatic observers said.

Their remarks came amid a contentious debate among mainland internet users over the past week about whether China should open its border to help handle the many thousands of people fleeing conflict in Syria and other Middle Eastern nations.

Foreign Minister Wang Yi weighed into the highly-charged discussion, pledging to help find a political solution to end Syria’s civil war.

“To solve the refugee problems in the Middle East, we must first and foremost accelerate the political settlement of the Syria conflict,” he was quoted as saying by a Chinese foreign ministry statement released on late Saturday during a visit to Lebanon.

“Refugees are not migrants. As the situation improves in Syria it is natural that the refugees will begin to return to their country”.

Noting that Lebanon, which sheltered some 1.5 million Syrian refugees – equal to about a third of the Mediterranean country’s total population of 4.5 million people – was under enormous pressure, Wang vowed increased Chinese assistance to help Lebanon deal with the refugee crisis.

Analysts believed Wang’s comments showed Beijing was not ready to change its stance on the refugee issue.

“China has been playing an increasingly active role in the Syrian conflict, but I don’t think China is considering to provide shelter to people fleeing Syria or other war-torn Middle East nations,” said Hua Liming, a former Chinese ambassador to Iran.

Chinese internet users say ‘no’ to refugees from Middle East

“To be fair, it is not that China has explicitly refused to shelter Syrian refugees or those displaced by war and conflicts in the region. More importantly, refugees from the Middle East usually choose Arab nations or developed countries, such as the US and Europe, instead of China”.

Li Guofu, a Middle East specialist with the China Institute of International Studies, also said China was not an ideal destination for Middle Eastern refugees due to religious, cultural and political considerations.

“Wang’s remarks were in line with Beijing’s long-standing policy on the Middle East, which tried to stay away from domestic violence of other nations while trying to live up to its international obligation by providing financial and other humanitarian assistance,” he said.

Shen Jiru, of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, also said it was not fair to expect China to “clean up the mess” in Syria left by the US-led coalition.

“Despite China still being a developing nation with our own poverty, population and other development problems, it has done its job to help resolve the Syrian crisis. The US and its allies should take greater responsibility for the refugee issue because it was their interventionist policies that created the crisis in the first place,” Shen said.

Of the record number of 22.5 million refugees globally at the end of last year, 5.5 million were forced to flee Syria, according to United Nations statistics.

On top of nearly 700 million yuan (US$102 million) over the years, China pledged in January to invest another 200 million yuan to help Middle Eastern nations deal with the refugee crisis.

 

[TaiShang]

What are the root causes?

Some think China is a freaking charity bowl.

Thankfully government is not blinded by cheap patting on the shoulder. China has 50 million + in absolute poverty and villages with difficult access. The priority is obvious.

I believe the Gulf region by itself can easly help solve those issues. If KSA spent half of the amount they just announced to spend on US weapons, that should be enough to make visible change.

The US, for its part, instead of using depleted uranium ammunition on civilians in Syria, stop inciting hatred, allow Syria unite and have control over its borders, and pay dearly for the problems caused, including accepting immigrants to work and live in the US.

 

[+4vsgorillas-Apebane]

Its unfortunate but as the saying goes, "charity starts at home".

China already have massive problems with poverty, especially in the western regions. Adding even more strain is just not an option.

The instability in the middle east is caused by the west. It goes back and back from the crusades to the British empire to the invasion of Iraq in 2003. Let the west deal with the mess they caused.

 

[TaiShang]

UNHCR chief, FCUK OFF...

only those with Chinese blood (Overseas Chinese) , with Confucian background (East Asian)

Totally agree!

 

[grey boy 2]

Don't ever fall for those so-called refugees charity trap, WE Hongkongers has been paying the price for decades (20 years) till now and still counting, 230000 "Vietnamese Refugees" wounds are still fresh. This crisis cost Hong Kong HK$8.7 billion and the UNHCR still owes the territory HK$1.16 billion. And the worst of all, they will bite the hands that feeds them any time any day, the most ungrateful, see this!

How Europe can learn from the hard lessons of Hong Kong's Vietnamese refugee crisis

READ MORE http://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/...rn-hard-lessons-hong-kongs-vietnamese-refugee

 

[rcrmj]

the ones who created this mess should have the sole responsibility to clean it up, we are only interested in doing business not to create political unrest in other countries

 

[AndrewJin]

the ones who created this mess should have the sole responsibility to clean it up, we are only interested in doing business not to create pulicial unrest in other countries

Murica should take all of them !

 

[rcrmj]

Murica should take all of them !

as if it can happen```they are very smart and cunning```but the political correct Europeans are taking all the mess

 

[Jacob Martin]

What exactly are the root causes?

Apparently,it is war

China didn't create those wars nor profit from them, the UN refugee chief is speaking to the wrong country.

"Root causes" is a euphemism for denial of the proposition that the problems in the Middle-East/North Africa could have anything to do with doctrine. It is predicted upon the assertion that when people profess a set of beliefs that would obviously lead to violence, we are to assume that they are, in fact, either lying or deluded. Apparently, the true cause of all violence and misery are despotism , poverty or foreign intervention. It can have nothing to do with belief.

It does not matter whether or not China has done anything to cause the present situation. If you believe in the above-mentioned thesis, then there is always some tangential proof that all counties are complicit in causing the misery that is currently unfolding.

 

[Stuttgart001]

"Root causes" is a euphemism for denial of the proposition that the problems in the Middle-East/North Africa could have anything to do with doctrine. It is predicted upon the assertion that when people profess a set of beliefs that would obviously lead to violence, we are to assume that they are, in fact, either lying or deluded. Apparently, the true cause of all violence and misery is either despotism , poverty or foreign intervention. It can have nothing to do with belief.

It does not matter whether or not China has done anything to case the present situation. If you believe in the above-mentioned thesis, then there is always some tangential proof that all counties are complicit in causing the misery that is currently unfolding.

What do you mean all the countries ? So Tuvalu should be responsible for despotism , poverty or foreign intervention ?
Did China make these countries be despotic or pover? Did China intervent or support intervention ?
China insisted no intervention in these countries and veto or abstain the interventing resolutions in UN. What China get ? The asscusation from these hypocritical western leftists. Now they find they have messed up everything ,even their own country.
Stop such nonsense. Do not drag others in.

 

[Jacob Martin]

What do you mean all the countries ? So Tuvalu should be responsible for despotism , poverty or foreign intervention ?
Did China make these countries be despotic or pover? Did China intervent or support intervention ?
China insisted no intervention in these countries and veto or abstain the interventing resolutions in UN. What China get ? The asscusation from these hypocritical western leftists. Now they find they have messed up everything ,even their own country.
Stop such nonsense. Do not drag others in.

You miss the nuance of language but that's all right.

What I said was this - the global response to the situation in the Middle-East/North Africa can be either based in reality or in victimhood. It seems to me that you are basing your response on reality. That is unacceptable to the SJW platform. According to it, all problems faced by people in that region can be laid on the doorstep of other nations. Of course, while they specifically talk about Western nations, it would logically apply to all nations, insofar as they have dealt with that part of the world in any manner.

For example, I am sure that you are aware that the presence of Israel is often cited as a primary reason for the situation in that part of the world. Support for the Zionist entity is a major reason why the US is blamed. Question is, does the Chinese government have any dealing with the Zionist entity? Defence? Trade? If the answer is yes, then why is China not indirectly responsible for the current situation?

Then we come to the issue of Iran. According to the Saudis and their allies, Iran is the principal instigator in the region. Does China buy oil or invest in Iran? If yes, there you go again.

The House of al Saud and other authoritarian regimes in the Middle-East are also cited as a reason for the discord. Does China buy oil from these nations? If yes, then it must follow that the Chinese are propping up illegitimate, oppressive regimes, against whom much of the public anger is directed.

So you see, whichever way you look at it, you can always find indirect correlation between what a country does and the consequences in the Arab World. According to this theory, there is essentially no difference between the US military support for the House of al Saud and others buying oil.

Of course, one could also take the sane, rational and more nuanced view that interacting with Arab governments as part of international commerce does not mean that China or any other country is responsible for the chaos. But that would mean that at least part of the blame had to be shared by the Arabs themselves. And we cannot allow that, can we?

Hey, don't get angry at me. I am just the messenger. Hope your doubts are now clarified.

 

[powastick]

Some think China is a freaking charity bowl.

Thankfully government is not blinded by cheap patting on the shoulder. China has 50 million + in absolute poverty and villages with difficult access. The priority is obvious.

I believe the Gulf region by itself can easly help solve those issues. If KSA spent half of the amount they just announced to spend on US weapons, that should be enough to make visible change.

The US, for its part, instead of using depleted uranium ammunition on civilians in Syria, stop inciting hatred, allow Syria unite and have control over its borders, and pay dearly for the problems caused, including accepting immigrants to work and live in the US.

This is call, after defecating, ask other people wipe their bottom.

Lmao, in a country where foreign languages are incomprehensible and useless, how could non-Chinese refugees survive here? The last successful attempt was to accept thousands of Vietnamese refugees to settle in Southwest China.

Even Japan not dumb.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/201...apan-refuses-99-percent-refugee-applications/