UN Human rights chief takes on China and other powers in her speech

[Beast]

ok.

That is why I always try to find authentic news from the sits of CPC new websites. Very reliable and always truthful.

Sure, BBC talks about rape of India documentary which is ban in India by modi. Maybe you can find truth from BBC.

 

[Shankranthi]

Sure, BBC talks about rape of India documentary which is ban in India by modi. Maybe you can find truth from BBC.

But I just said I trust CPC new website. BBC is just the british version of the same.

BBC is owned by the british govt. unlike the Dawn.

 

[Tshering22]

UNHRC can simply babble at bigger countries and bully the little ones. As we saw, their treatment to Myanmar is different from China or USA.

 

[Shankranthi]

UNHRC can simply babble at bigger countries and bully the little ones. As we saw, their treatment to Myanmar is different from China or USA.

That is the way of the world.

Myanmar as a buddhist is a minority among the christian and muslims nations that hold sway. And it keeps its distance from china to get china to support it.

 

[El Sidd]

So ? UN chief has clearly used her maiden speech to talk about muslim oppression in china.

Kofi Annan has already clarified that UN resolution on kashmir was just an Advisory / recommendation, not binding on any nation.

China does not have a Muslim problem. The world is intent on painting it as such.

Kofi Annan is dead

 

[Shankranthi]

China does not have a Muslim problem. The world is intent on painting it as such.

Kofi Annan is dead

Correction. China has made sure it does not have a Muslim problem.

Kofi Annan is dead, but his words have been recorded for posterity and that too as the UN Head.

 

[El Sidd]

Correction. China has made sure it does not have a Muslim problem.

Kofi Annan is dead, but his words have been recorded for posterity and that too as the UN Head.

Ok

 

[Shankranthi]

Ok

cool.

 

[Beast]

But I just said I trust CPC new website. BBC is just the british version of the same.

BBC is owned by the british govt. unlike the Dawn.

That's right. Chinese are righteous people unlike westerner who talk one thing but do another... See, the American talk about freedom and human right but will not hesitate to work with regime like Saudi and UAE which bans women or behead convicts
in public.

 

[Shankranthi]

That's right. Chinese are righteous people unlike westerner who talk one thing but do another... See, the American talk about freedom and human right but will not hesitate to work with regime like Saudi and UAE which bans women or behead convicts
in public.

I cannot claim to know the chinese people but I certainly understand the Chinese govt. and there is nothing righteous about them.

US is a society based on Law, so if the law recognizes kings and dictators as the legitimate ruler of the nation then US will deal with them.

I recognize US hypocrisy in using "morality" as a stick to beat its opponents while pretending to claim moral high ground. But such things are for the masses and in the long run, it just makes them a laughing stock.

If china takes that path too then it will be sad. But you know what they say. Imitation is the sincerest form of Flattery.

 

[Tshering22]

That is the way of the world.

Myanmar as a buddhist is a minority among the christian and muslims nations that hold sway. And it keeps its distance from china to get china to support it.

Then it was excellent that our leaders stood up to offer help to Myanmar president in the last state visit made by our PM. If we and the Chinese can actually support them, they would have a voice.

Can you imagine Italy or France not being supported by rest of western Europe against, say, Latin American groupings?

Then why not this.

 

[Shankranthi]

Then it was excellent that our leaders stood up to offer help to Myanmar president in the last state visit made by our PM. If we and the Chinese can actually support them, they would have a voice.

Can you imagine Italy or France not being supported by rest of western Europe against, say, Latin American groupings?

Then why not this.

Again I am in complete agreement.

Which is why India is promoting BIMSTEC and not SAARC.

 

[Tshering22]

Again I am in complete agreement.

Which is why India is promoting BIMSTEC and not SAARC.

SAARC is anyway dead.

Every time we talk about FTAs in the Subcontinent, everytime we end up getting into a slug-fest with Pakistan on just our mutual problem.

BIMSTEC shouldn't actually be just a stand-alone; instead it should be a body to collaborate with ASEAN.

 

[Shankranthi]

SAARC is anyway dead.

Every time we talk about FTAs in the Subcontinent, everytime we end up getting into a slug-fest with Pakistan on just our mutual problem.

BIMSTEC shouldn't actually be just a stand-alone; instead it should be a body to collaborate with ASEAN.

I think in time it will be approached by ASEAN.

But if you notice BIMSTEC is primarily composed of Dharmic nations with the exception of Bangladesh. So the agenda is pretty clear.

 

[Tshering22]

I think in time it will be approached by ASEAN.

But if you notice BIMSTEC is primarily composed of Dharmic nations with the exception of Bangladesh. So the agenda is pretty clear.

I think it translates from the simple statement: "We have all close friends in BIMSTEC". No border issues, no territorial attacks, no cases of terrorism, similar cultural orientation, developing countries with tremendous potential and of course, their individual access to the richer Far East and Southeast Asian markets allows for many arrangements which can benefit both sides.