What's new

Ultra Far Right Nationalism on the rise in Europe and Russia


I am shocked and disgusted.

Knew that there was a slave problem, but never knew the nexus is so massive.

Dirty pr*cks. How do they claim to have any religious or spiritual authority after remaining numb to such evil?

Sadly, trafficking rings are also present in our country that support the nexus created by scumbags like these and therefore our women and children become vulnerable.

It is a shame on all the governments of South Asia. They should commit suicides en masse for letting their people suffer so dishonourably in front of the world.

In this area, no on is superior or better and all South Asian countries suck at protecting their people.

Useless bunch of bloody bozos who are only good at looting a hard-working population.
 
. .
It's an interesting topic.

I believe that if White countries want to stay White, it's none of my (or anyone else's) business.

One point though. If you invite a Pakistani, or a Brazilian, or a Mexican, or a Libyan, to share in the spoils of your country, do not blame them if they say yes.

If you are living in a country that is 3rd world and you're given a free pass to move to a Western country, don't blame them when they say yes and bring their entire family with them.

THE BLAME LIES WITH YOU; YOU OPENED THE BORDER IN THE FIRST PLACE!
 
.
THE BLAME LIES WITH YOU; YOU OPENED THE BORDER IN THE FIRST PLACE!

You offer to close the borders?
But 90% of immigrants - illegal. They do it breaking the law.
May be Western Europeans must shoot them down?
 
.
You offer to close the borders?
But 90% of immigrants - illegal. They do it breaking the law.
May be Western Europeans must shoot them down?

It's not my business.

All I'm saying is that, if you want your nations to be racially homogeneous, to have not had the problem with non-Whites living in your countries in the first place, you should not have been so stupid to let them in.

It's too late now. What are you going to do? Are you going to eliminate all non-Whites?

Also, 90% of European immigrants are not illegal. You pulled that factoid out your butt.
 
. .
It's not my business.

All I'm saying is that, if you want your nations to be racially homogeneous, to have not had the problem with non-Whites living in your countries in the first place, you should not have been so stupid to let them in.

It's too late now. What are you going to do? Are you going to eliminate all non-Whites?

Also, 90% of European immigrants are not illegal. You pulled that factoid out your butt.
There is one bike.
SOme people go in the bus in Germany. Among them - the Turks and one German old lady. Turks laugh and argue that they will change when they become the majority in Germany. The old woman suffered, endured, and then said:
"You know, before the war, there lived a lot of Jews."
The fact about 90% - is true. I don't count people who alredy has pasports or 2-3 generations of immigrants.
 
.
Didn't you say earlier that you love immigration? Now you are saying you hate it? Boy, you Euros sure do change your minds quickly.

I've said i have nothing against controlled immigration,what is happening now is an open gate policy for all and i certainly don't agree that others should force on us multiculturalism because "Europe must not remain a monolyth".It's not about what we want,if the politicians will give us a referendum,the next day the polls will close you'll see barbed wire and armed guards with orders to shoot at our borders.They live in their ivory towers and don't give 2 cents about what we want.:

"we need foreign workers cause our numbers are dwindling!"----25% of europeans are unemployed!!!!!
 
.
There is one bike.
SOme people go in the bus in Germany. Among them - the Turks and one German old lady. Turks laugh and argue that they will change when they become the majority in Germany. The old woman suffered, endured, and then said:
"You know, before the war, there lived a lot of Jews."
The fact about 90% - is true. I don't count people who alredy has pasports or 2-3 generations of immigrants.

How do people illegally immigrate from Turkey? Other than overstaying their visas, it's impossible. Turkey and Germany don't share a land border.

Where is your source for this? Most of the immigration is legal, and it's the fault of the Europeans who allowed liberalized immigration laws in the first place.
 
.
How do people illegally immigrate from Turkey? Other than overstaying their visas, it's impossible. Turkey and Germany don't share a land border.

Where is your source for this? Most of the immigration is legal, and it's the fault of the Europeans who allowed liberalized immigration laws in the first place.
90% - such a quality of illegal workers come to Russia from Central Asia. I don't think numbers in West Europe are different. May be i say wrong - I mean they works illegaly.
 
.
I found this video on the Youtube channel of the publisher of "How Whites took over America". It's entertaining, & it makes an interesting point.

Hitler returns from Argentina :-)woot:) & decides to make Israel multicultural........

 
Last edited by a moderator:
.
90% - such a quality of illegal workers come to Russia from Central Asia. I don't think numbers in West Europe are different. May be i say wrong - I mean they works illegaly.

And Kavkazi Chechens and Dagestanis are citizens of Russia. You can't call them illegals like central asians.
 
.
My experiences with the North American Pakistani community has been far better, they seem far better integrated within the rest of society. Same for the ones in Germany, however, here in the UK we have the worst cases.
Perhaps not in my area in West London, but in East London, Luton, Rochdale, Bradford, Manchester and Birmingham.

I haven't had the chance to meet any British Pakistanis thus far but from what other people tell me and from what i have read, if i compare between the British Pakistanis and American Pakistanis, then yes American Pakistanis are better off in comparison.

Perhaps its because the brits are less strict on immigrant populations? Whatever the case, the problem is irreversible.
 
.
There is one bike.
SOme people go in the bus in Germany. Among them - the Turks and one German old lady. Turks laugh and argue that they will change when they become the majority in Germany. The old woman suffered, endured, and then said:
"You know, before the war, there lived a lot of Jews."
The fact about 90% - is true. I don't count people who alredy has pasports or 2-3 generations of immigrants.

The version i know about that story goes like this.

Two young Turkish boys take the bus in Germany. One said to other "Man there is lots of Turks here, maybe we should conquer this place." An old Germany lady hears the conversation, smiles and says "Years ago Jews said the same thing ". Boys are speechless. :)
 
.
That's because the americans as opposed to the british have stricter immigration policies.
I wouldn't be too sure of that. We have a growing number of illegals predominantly from Latin America and Liberals like Obama are easing the restrictions on these illegal immigrants in obtaining American citizenship.


@Desert Fox

I'm not one of those guys who think that WW2 was just evil nazis against good nations,it was a struggle for power between 2 blocs and the winners villified the loosers.I need no education in soviet barbarity as my country was at the receiving end of their actions and i know that people seem to forget that at the beginning of WW2 the USSR invaded Poland alongside nazi Germany or that the allies basically sold other european nations to the russians to have their peace of mind.Nor am I oblivious to allied war crimes like the bombing of Dresden or the infamous soviet Katyn massacre,rape of Germany and many others.That beeing sad,i don't find the nazis particularly pleasant either,they were just as bad as the soviets or english colonists,thought of themselves as superior to others and acted accordingly.

The difference between the "Nazis" (for arguments sake i will go with this term), the Soviets, the British, French, and the Americans was that the "Nazis" were not killing anyone nor conquering non-German territory before 1939 (date of the start of WW2 in Europe).

Stalin was mass starving his own people (between 19-20 million died as a result), the French were oppressing and killing people in their own colonies, the British ruled 500,000,000 in their own colonies and subjugated millions through violent means, the Americans were killing Moros in the Philippines after annexing the former Spanish colony.

Meanwhile, Evil "Nazi" Hitler only wanted back the German territories that were taken from Germany after its defeat in WW1. And for wanting back the Danzig territory (which was 97% ethnic German populated) from Poland, Hitler and the "Nazis" are blamed for having aspirations to "take over the world".

So i don't see how Hitler was "just as bad" for having not killed millions of people while the World Wide Freedom Loving Democracies and their Communist buddies were butchering and starving people.

Out of all of the nations that participated in that war, i'd have to say that "Nazi" Germany was the more humane.


Anyway, this link below is of my post from another thread and but it answers/refutes all of your misconceptions of "Nazi" Germany, including the "racist" allegations of the victorious side.

http://www.defence.pk/forums/genera...history-never-before-seen-11.html#post4083036
 
Last edited by a moderator:
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom