What's new

UK Trident Submarine - A Nuclear disaster waiting to happen

Indus Falcon

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Mar 4, 2011
Messages
6,910
Reaction score
107
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
Royal Navy investigates Trident whistle-blower William McNeilly who claims nuclear programme is a 'disaster waiting to happen'
by Adam Withnall

Sunday 17 May 2015

Trident.JPG


Able seaman William McNeilly has gone on the run after making a series of damaging accusations which the MoD says are 'subjective and unsubstantiated'

The Royal Navy is investigating claims by an apparent whistle-blower that there is a “complete lack of concern for security” that makes the Trident nuclear weapons programme vulnerable to terror attack.

The claims were made in an online post by 25-year-old William McNeilly, and included a photograph of his Navy ID card.

McNeilly said he had “sacrificed” his freedom and a well-paid career to make the claims in an 18-page report entitled “The Secret Nuclear Threat”, and that after posting it he had gone on the run.

The Ministry of Defence confirmed that McNeilly was a member of the naval service, and a source said the Navy was “concerned for the whereabouts and wellbeing of AB (able seaman) McNeilly and working closely with civilian police to locate him”.

v3-web-trident-1-getty.jpg

HMS Vanguard sits in dock at Faslane Submarine base on the river Clyde in Helensburgh, Scotland. File photo

In his report, McNeilly claimed he had witnessed a host of inadequate systems and checks while training with the Trident programme, from “things like food hygiene” to failed launch tests, flooding on board submarines, fires in the missile compartment and “a complete lack of security”.
“If airport security and nuclear weapon security were both compared to prisons,” McNeilly writes, “the airport would be Alcatraz and base security would be house arrest.”

McNeilly's report: Key claims

• Missile launch tests failed on three occasions
• Collision with French nuclear sub covered up
• Failures to carry out security checks on bags
• Computer waste representing major fire risk
• Missile safety alarms muted and ignored
• Accidental flooding of torpedo compartment
• Failure to question recording of top-secret info

McNeilly described the state of Trident security as “the biggest threat the UK faces”, and said he was only releasing “selected information” in order to avoid damaging security further.

“I'm releasing this information in this way because it's the only way I can to be sure it gets out,” he said, adding that he had “raised concerns through the chain of command on multiple occasions” and got nowhere.

Military-Trident-Shares-Up.jpg

The Conservative government has pledged to renew Trident (AFP)

In a statement, the MoD said: “The Royal Navy takes security and nuclear safety extremely seriously and we are fully investigating both the issue of the unauthorised release of this document and its contents.
“The naval service operates its submarine fleet under the most stringent safety regime and submarines do not go to sea unless they are completely safe to do so.”

On the claims made in the online report, the MoD said it contained “a number of subjective and unsubstantiated personal views, made by a very junior sailor, with which the Naval Service completely disagrees”.

It said that the details released in the report “do not pose any security risk to our personnel or operations”, but that it was “right” they be investigated in detail.
In his report, McNeilly describes Trident as a “disaster waiting to happen” and says he knew colleagues who agreed but “never tell the public”.

He said he hoped to receive “a pardon from the Prime Minister” for going public, and added that he plans to hand himself in to the police.

Royal Navy investigates Trident whistle-blower William McNeilly who claims nuclear programme is a 'disaster waiting to happen' - Home News - UK - The Independent

@Gabriel92 @Atanz @Nihonjin1051@FaujHistorian @DESERT FIGHTER @Desertfalcon @Indos @Akheilos @Taygibay @syedali73 @KAL-EL
 
.
Could be worst :

The machines may work but what about the folks servicing them?

Tay.
 
.
wow your subs are so old.

driving junk themselfs and trying to make fun about russia. who already has taken first BOREI class nuclear sub into service.

nato is so pisspoor. your overrated servicemen earn so much money for nothing. they suck all money up. nothing left for new weapons systems.

lel
 
. . . .
wow your subs are so old.

Sure, the last of mine that could possibly have to throw party favors to your people,
entered service in 2010 :
1280px-S619.Le_Terrible.wmt.jpg


and the next batch that hunts for yours is coming in 2017 :
13n6411-avec-floutage_article_pleine_colonne.jpg
*
Programme Barracuda : Mer en vue pour le Suffren | colsbleus.fr : le magazine de la Marine Nationale

All nuclear driven of course. You must have us confused with another great nation
that can't produce working new designs and is stuck building Kilos with such slow
procurement that their mili naval industry had to try to buy foreign, funnily, also French!

But I catch that your enthusiasm overcame the facts, it happens!

Good day, Tay.

* In case you're puzzled because it's become rare where you live, it's a naval shipyard! :yes4:
 
Last edited:
.
wow your subs are so old.

driving junk themselfs and trying to make fun about russia. who already has taken first BOREI class nuclear sub into service.

nato is so pisspoor. your overrated servicemen earn so much money for nothing. they suck all money up. nothing left for new weapons systems.

lel
Russian navy

Conventional submarines = 19
(3 commissioned pre 1985, 5 commissioned 1985-1989, 8 commissioned 1990-1994 and 3 commissioned 2010-2014)

SSN = 16
(2 commissioned 1985-1989, 10 commissioned 1990-1994, 2 commissioned 1995-1999, 1 in 2001 and 1 in 2014)

SSGN = 7
(1 commissioned pre 1990, 5 commissioned 1990-1994 and 1 1995-1999)

SSBN = 13
(2 commissioned pre 1980, 3 commissioned 1980-1984, 4 commissioned 1985-1989, 1 commissioned 1990-1994 and 3 commissioned 2013-2014)

UK Navy by comparison

SSN = 6, of which 3 from 1985-1989, 1 from 1991 and 2 from 2007 or newer.
SSBN = 4, of which 2 1990-1994 and 2 1995-1999
 
.
So out of 55, 20 at least were commissioned before the end of the Cold War ( and USSR )?

36% I'm almost expecting someone to say that maths stopped working … or that they're imperialist! :o:

JK, Tay. 8-)
 
. . . . .
I had the same reaction,if these allegations are true,that will give more 'voices' to those that want to get ride of Tridents,and they will have good arguments...

Well, UK doesn't even own the Trident II missiles, so they should work with France to improve the M51 SLBM.

With the combine might of UK and France, perhaps even Germany, then i can see that the M51 might have a much brighter future.
 
.
Well, UK doesn't even own the Trident II missiles, so they should work with France to improve the M51 SLBM.

With the combine might of UK and France, perhaps even Germany, then i can see that the M51 might have a much brighter future.

Not going to happen.... in 100 years nor 1 billions years.
-
But they should develop SLBMs,so to be independent toward them,and they have the capabilities to do so.

GdBtMIi.png


I don't know if it's accurate @Transhumanist @SvenSvensonov
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom