UK military steps up plans for Iran attack amid fresh nuclear fears

[888jamie888]

Lol.. england... really? even argentine gave u guys hell of a time.. n ur talkin abt Iran? tht junkie PM of urs must be smokin some real fun stuff... i bet he got it frm A"stan...

Our forces may be small but we have the 4th largest military expenditure. We were outnumbered and we still managed to reclaim our islands a couple of thousand miles away.
I'm sure if Iran made nuclear threats, the British would be more than willing and capable to take on Iran. Besides we would be with Nato.
Just hypothetical of course.

 

[DESERT FIGHTER]

Our forces may be small but we have the 4th largest military expenditure. We were outnumbered and we still managed to reclaim our islands a couple of thousand miles away.
I'm sure if Iran made nuclear threats, the British would be more than willing and capable to take on Iran. Besides we would be with Nato.
Just hypothetical of course.

Against an enemy with inferior weapons,very small budget,no self reliance,bad training.. yet u lost alot in tht war.... Now consider Iran.. one of the worlds largest oil producing countries,Big army,relf reliant,big population,lots to spend,lots of volunteers.... thouands of miles away... Plus muslim jihadis will pour in to fight any invasion like afghanistan n iraq....

NATO...hmm... lemme see what was the result of afghan war my good man?

 

[888jamie888]

Against an enemy with inferior weapons,very small budget,no self reliance,bad training.. yet u lost alot in tht war.... Now consider Iran.. one of the worlds largest oil producing countries,Big army,relf reliant,big population,lots to spend,lots of volunteers.... thouands of miles away... Plus muslim jihadis will pour in to fight any invasion like afghanistan n iraq....

NATO...hmm... lemme see what was the result of afghan war my good man?

At the time they were pretty well armed and spent a fair bit on the military, they were certainly the strongest in South America.
We won the war in 66 weeks 250 dead, what more could we do? The US considered it impossible.
Iran certainly is quite a strong country, but to stand up to the might of Nato?? Bearing in mind the countries we invaded used everything at their disposal, the US used but a fraction.
Well the Taliban have been ousted and now live in caves, OBL is dead. Things aren't too bad.

 

[Arian]

At the time they were pretty well armed and spent a fair bit on the military, they were certainly the strongest in South America.
We won the war in 66 weeks 250 dead, what more could we do? The US considered it impossible.
Iran certainly is quite a strong country, but to stand up to the might of Nato?? Bearing in mind the countries we invaded used everything at their disposal, the US used but a fraction.
Well the Taliban have been ousted and now live in caves, OBL is dead. Things aren't too bad.

I agree with your post excluding the last sentence. Taliban is not ousted completely. Also, do not forget that Iran helped you (I mean the allied forces) in ousting the Taliban in Herat.
Taliban is by no sense comparable even to the Basij of Iran. Even the Basij is a stronger enemy than the Taliban for you, let alone the IRGC divisions and the Iranian Army. I believe talking about victory on Iran is completely about how you define 'victory' in that war. If you define victory as bombing Iran's infrastructures and stopping its progress then you'll surely win and Iran's response in that case would be limited to destabilizing the Middle East and probably Latin America against your interests. but If you're talking about a regime change then the story would be pretty different.

 

[DESERT FIGHTER]

At the time they were pretty well armed and spent a fair bit on the military, they were certainly the strongest in South America.
We won the war in 66 weeks 250 dead, what more could we do? The US considered it impossible.

Not as much as UK>? and shytty training,limited resources...unlike Iran?

Iran certainly is quite a strong country, but to stand up to the might of Nato??

Sure it cant... would turn into another Afghanistan ... more like quick sand for NATO forces considering the examples of iraq n afghanistan.... not to forget the bad condition of economy it wont be viable either.

Bearing in mind the countries we invaded used everything at their disposal, the US used but a fraction.

Iraq? paper lion with an army of clowns!who didnt even know how to aim?

Well the Taliban have been ousted and now live in caves, OBL is dead. Things aren't too bad.

Lol..OBL dead,AQ still there...taliban controlling like 80-90% of afghanistan... NATO bribing talis not to attack them ..i.e french or was it the italians?.... US negotiating with the taliban?power sharing... trillions losts.... things sure r bad.

 

[zaiby]

Many media is now posting this news including Danish, that Israel may attack Irans nuclear facilities.
And that Benjamin Netanyahu is trying to gain support for a military strike among his ministers. And that they are waiting for support of great britain.

Some are writing that computer worm Stuxnet sabotaged many of the centrifuges, which Iranians uses to enrich uranium, and up to half were estimated to be subsequently destroyed.

But now the diplomats believe that the program is at full force again, and the Iranians may even be moving some new and more powerful centrifuges into the facility so far underground that they can't be destroyed by missiles.

What do you think is it only propaganda??

 

[PERSIAN GOD KING]

Our forces may be small but we have the 4th largest military expenditure. We were outnumbered and we still managed to reclaim our islands a couple of thousand miles away.
I'm sure if Iran made nuclear threats, the British would be more than willing and capable to take on Iran. Besides we would be with Nato.
Just hypothetical of course.

We need to sort the looters out first, then Iran.

 

[zaiby]

.....................

 

[PERSIAN GOD KING]

I have already made a thread about that friend

 

[Kompromat]

That means we should start counting the remaining days and week of Israel?

 

[PteX]

That means we should start counting the remaining days and week of Israel?

Mark it on your calendar.
Don`t stop till it`s accomplished but don`t hold your breath, we would miss you too much.

 

[Roybot]

If it ever happens it will be a few missile strikes. It will never be a boots on ground situation.

I hope it never happens though. PEtrol is expensive as it is

 

[p4kistan]

Zionist media propoganda at play here guys.

David Camerson can say goodbye to being the Prime Minister before British forces consider attacking Iran. Why? The liberals are in coalition with the conservatives and there is a BIG no no to any misadventure from the liberals so the conservatives have to take this into account. If they don't the liberals are likely to break of the coalition before any action is taken and i'm sure labour won't have any appetite for a new war.

The Israelis need to realise that Iran is no pushover, heck you couldn't do **** to a lightly armed militia Hezbullah etc, do they really think they will walk away scot free. They are disillusioned if they think so.

Last month the zionist controlled media tried to ferment further hatred between the arabs and persians by the so called assination attempt on a saudi prince. The Israelis and nato etc need to realise any action against Iran is actually going to bring further support from the muslim population across the globe for iran and make it stronger, muslim leaders may see Iran as snakes but the population of these nations don't

a lot of people do think Iran is entitiled to build nuclear weapons, heck i don't blame them if they do with all this war rhetoric going on. Israelis better luck after dimona, i'm sure they missiles can reach israeli facilities.

the Zionists and Netanyahu aswell as nato/europe are merely trying to draw attention away from their own problems. No jobs, inflation, economies in ruins. Are they sure they want more conflict as i would categorically advise them against this.

NEXT WEEKS NEWS WILL BE PAKISTANS NUCLEAR ASSETS HAVE FALLEN IN THE HANDS OF THE HAQQANI NETWORK.

THE WEEK AFTER PAKISTAN IS AIDING IRAN IN FURTHER NUCLEAR DEVELOPMENT.

AND SO FORTH, ZIONIST MEDIA OUTLETS LITERALLY NEED TO GET A HOLD OF THEMSELVES.

 

[CallsignAlzaeem]

Just a propaganda,UK cannot go on any other war,If it ever did it would be the last one,UK lacks money right now to even run itself.

 

[Icarus]

The Powers cannot sustain another front, therefore any military action against Iran is unlikely.
However, given the situation that missile strikes on Iran's Nuclear Installations do occur, which they won't since I have been lead to believe that Iran's Nuclear sites are protected by advanced Air Defence Systems like the S-300, the fall out of radiation from military grade radioactive material will affect neighbouring countries, so what do the western soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan do? Wear Hazmat suits to bed instead of their PJs?
Secondly, won't Pakistan be pissed that radiation is spilling over it's border? Won't it encourage Pakistan along with the SCO to possibly declare the presence of ISAF a threat to regional security leading to an ultimatum to their withdrawal? If they fail to withdraw, it could result in small scale military hostility, it's a cloud nuclear dust we're talking about, pretty serious stuff.