Everything that I wrote are facts. Unlike your inferiority ridden nonsense as usual, my stateless and Arabized Kurdish Gypsy.
The notion of Kurds (Iranian nomads mainly but not only, as this included Anatolian and Arab nomads) were invented by Arabs not more than 1000 years ago. That is why there is no written testament of the notion of "Kurd" before.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Origin_of_the_Kurds
The notion of "Kurds" (people) was first recorded several centuries after Hijrah by Arabs. Recent invention. All this nonsense of some 2500 year old history are unproven and baseless theories.
That is why there is no "Kurdish history" anywhere in Northern Iraq or Northern Syria that is more than 1000 years old, lol. Even the city names are of Semitic origin. It's a bit of a joke.
Your irrelevant and tiny Medes is just that. Irrelevant. Not that this little irrelevant entity had anything to do with a bunch of stateless Kurds.
Comparing that with the cradle of civilization (Arab world) and the tons of ancient civilizations in Arabia alone (Al-Magar, Dilmun, Magan, Thamud, Nabatean, Sumer, etc.) that predate anything remotely found in your wasteland or Iran as a whole for that matter is a complete and utter joke.
Listen at the end of the day you are just a stateless Arabized Kurd whose entire history has been shaped by Semitic civilizations (without them you would have remained the original barbarians that you were before becoming civilized by us) and who has been ruled for centuries by the same Arabs that you have bene influenced by on all fronts.
As for women, don't make me laugh. Arabian beauty has been immortalized in all ancient cultures and has been written about for millennia. Since the first ancient Arab queens and rulers (some of the earliest in history if not the oldest recorded female rulers) ruled the region. Queen of Sheba, Queen Zenobia, Queen Samsi, Queen Mavia etc.
As for the Arabized Ottomans (who were Arabized on every front and Arabs made up the vast majority of Ottomans), the ones ruling Arabia were Arabs themselves you dumb pfuck. Sharifs of Makkah and Madinah were only second to the Sultan (nice Arabic title). Nor were Arabs ever enslaved in history for even a single day. In fact the most respected people were Arabs under the Ottomans. As for actual slaves, you need to read about Turkic eunuchs and slaves under Arab service (Rashidun, Umayyad, Abbasid, Fatimid). The same Arabs that ruled the Caliphate for 1000 + years including your entire entity, half of modern-day Turkey and much of Central Asia. Creating larger and more influential empires than anyone else in history from this region and only the British Empire can compare in terms of lasting mpact.
Speaking about Black people, they were enslaved by us as well. So you have that in common with that my brown stateless Arabized Kurd. As were Europeans and everyone else that waged wars agains us and lost. A normal and widespread practice across the entire world as well.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arab_slave_trade
As for skin color, the Caucasian race originated in the Arab world. The much respected Science Magazine can educate you about that here below although I expect the information the article contains to be out of your reach.
When it comes to skin color, the team found a patchwork of evolution in different places, and three separate genes that produce light skin, telling a complex story for how European’s skin evolved to be much lighter during the past 8000 years. The modern humans who came out of Africa to originally settle Europe about 40,000 years are presumed to have had dark skin, which is advantageous in sunny latitudes. And the new data confirm that about 8500 years ago, early hunter-gatherers in Spain, Luxembourg, and Hungary also had darker skin: They lacked versions of two genes—SLC24A5 and SLC45A2—that lead to depigmentation and, therefore, pale skin in Europeans today.
But in the far north—where low light levels would favor pale skin—the team found a different picture in hunter-gatherers: Seven people from the 7700-year-old Motala archaeological site in southern Sweden had both light skin gene variants, SLC24A5 and SLC45A2. They also had a third gene, HERC2/OCA2, which causes blue eyes and may also contribute to light skin and blond hair. Thus ancient hunter-gatherers of the far north were already pale and blue-eyed, but those of central and southern Europe had darker skin.
Then, the first farmers from the Near East arrived in Europe; they carried both genes for light skin. As they interbred with the indigenous hunter-gatherers, one of their light-skin genes swept through Europe, so that central and southern Europeans also began to have lighter skin. The other gene variant, SLC45A2, was at low levels until about 5800 years ago when it swept up to high frequency.
http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2015/04/how-europeans-evolved-white-skin
No go cry yourself to sleep and don't mention women again when your compatriots are whoring themselves out to Arabs in the GCC 24/7, stateless Arabized Gypsy. You are leading this discipline. Have a bit of shame. Historically as well since your entity was conquered left and right by every Tom and Dick.
BTW your stateless Kurdish brothers just killed 11 IRGC terrorists (a weekly occurrence in your failed entity). So go celebrate that instead of trolling in a thread that creates butthurt for you for obvious reasons.
https://en.trend.az/iran/politics/2931961.html
@SALMAN F @OutOfAmmo @The SC @Hamilcar
Apologies Chinese friends. A Kurdish Arabized house negro entered this thread. You see, this individual belongs to a 1000 year old stateless ethnic group that never had their own nation and who have never amounted to anything. They number less people than the Arab population of Iraq alone and their entire economy combined is smaller than that of Riyadh let alone UAE. Apologies in advance.
@haidian @YuChen
