What's new

U.S. says Russia is working with Syria's Assad to move militia to Libya

Shawnee

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Jan 22, 2020
Messages
3,081
Reaction score
-1
Country
United States
Location
United Kingdom
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-libya-security-usa-syria-idUSKBN22J301


WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The United States does not support the offensive of Libya’s eastern-based military leader Khalifa Haftar against Tripoli and believes Russia is working with Syrian President Bashar al-Assad to transfer militia fighters and equipment to Libya, senior U.S. officials said on Thursday.

Libya is a messy battlefield with heavy involvement by foreign fighters. The United States and the United Nations have warned against the deepening footprint of Russian private contractor forces while Turkey and the United Arab Emirates have also deployed drones, according to diplomats.

Jim Jeffrey, U.S. special envoy for Syria, speaking to reporters on the same call, said the battlefield could even get more complicated. “We know that, certainly the Russians are working with Assad to transfer militia fighters, possibly third country, possibly Syrian, to Libya, as well as equipment.”

He did not elaborate.

Russian private military contractor Wagner Group has up to 1,200 people deployed in Libya, strengthening Haftar’s forces, a confidential United Nations report seen by Reuters said on Wednesday. [nL1N2CO16W]

HAFTAR-ASSAD TIES

President Donald Trump called Haftar last year, in the first weeks of the offensive, in a move that some diplomats took as a sign Washington might be backing the former Gaddafi officer. Since then the United States has urged all sides to de-escalate, a call that fell on deaf ears.

When asked if Haftar’s foreign backers could persuade him to end the offensive given recent setbacks on the field, Wooster said: “I don’t think that in the near-term offing, at least in the foreseeable future, there’s any likely prospect whatsoever that that would happen.

“For as long as there is an objective they can meet through Haftar as an instrument, we don’t see them backing down,” Wooster said.

U.S. officials also expressed discomfort about ties between Haftar and Assad.

“There is a very troubling other element here and that is ... Haftar’s establishment of so-called diplomatic relations with the Assad regime, which is very much a part of the piece of the question of Syrian mercenaries, at least on his side of the equation,” Wooster said.

Haftar opened an embassy in Syria in March and called on Damascus to unite in their common fight against Turkey-backed militant groups. Turkey has long called for the departure of Assad and has backed Syrian rebels against Assad’s forces.

Assad has looked to shed his country’s pariah status and regain Arab support. The United Arab Emirates reopened its Damascus embassy in December 2018 and has forged closer ties after once supporting rebels fighting against Assad.
 
please pay attention to this part:

“The United States does not support the offensive of Libya’s eastern-based military leader.”

Why should US not support the offensive of his own citizen for 20 years with alleged support from allies like KSA, UAE and Israel against a Muslim brotherhood state?

Is Russia investing on a US citizen for the wrong cause?

What are your thoughts? Why is US pushing back from supporting Hafter?
 
please pay attention to this part:

“The United States does not support the offensive of Libya’s eastern-based military leader.”

Why should US not support the offensive of his own citizen for 20 years with alleged support from allies like KSA, UAE and Israel against a Muslim brotherhood state?

Is Russia investing on a US citizen for the wrong cause?

What are your thoughts? Why is US pushing back from supporting Hafter?

It has been always an American tradition to support the winning side unless that winning side screw up things themselves. American hates losers. Haftar has to show some solid sign of winning before getting a more overt US support. The Russian support for a foreign power is never perpetual. That is also why Russia doesn't have any reliable ally either. They only have transnational relationships.
 
Back
Top Bottom