What's new

U.S. Intel: China Ordered Attack on Indian Troops in Galwan River Valley

HalfMoon

BANNED
Joined
Nov 21, 2018
Messages
3,832
Reaction score
-2
Country
India
Location
India
U.S. Intel: China Ordered Attack on Indian Troops in Galwan River Valley
The assessment from U.S. intelligence contradicts China’s timeline of the bloody skirmish in the contested border region last week.


By Paul D. Shinkman, Senior Writer, National Security June 22, 2020, at 1:06 p.m.





More
A SENIOR CHINESE general authorized his forces to attack Indian troops in the Galwan River valley last week, resulting in a brutal skirmish that killed dozens and dramatically escalated tensions between the two Asian powerhouses, according to a U.S. intelligence assessment.

[
READ:

China Adopts Conciliatory Tone With India ]
Gen. Zhao Zongqi, head of the Western Theater Command and among the few combat veterans still serving in the People's Liberation Army, approved the operation along the contested border region of northern India and southwestern China, a source familiar with the assessment says on the condition of anonymity. Zhao, who has overseen prior standoffs with India, has previously expressed concerns that China must not appear weak to avoid exploitation by the United States and its allies, including in New Delhi, the source says, and saw the faceoff last week as a way to "teach India a lesson."

The assessment contradicts China's subsequent assertions about what happened last week. And it indicates the deadly and contentious incident – in which at least 20 Indian and 35 Chinese troops died, and reportedly a handful on each side were captured and subsequently released – was not the result of a tense circumstance that spiraled out of control, as has happened before, but rather a purposeful decision by Beijing to send a message of strength to India.

Yet that plan appears to have backfired, as the incident sparked widespread outrage in India that continues a week later. And Beijing's attempts to make India more amenable to future negotiations, including about contested territory, instead appear to have pushed the economic giant closer to the U.S.

Much is at stake, far beyond territorial control. The U.S. has pressured India for months to back away from employing Chinese tech company Huawei to help build its 5G infrastructure. In the aftermath of last week's incident, Indians were reportedly deleting Chinese social media app TikTok and destroying phones made in China.

"It does the very opposite of what China wanted," the source says. "This is not a victory for China's military."

Officials from India and China were scheduled to meet on Monday to discuss the fallout from the incident. It remains unclear the extent to which Chinese President Xi Jinping was involved in the decisions that led to last week's bloody encounter, though analysts familiar with Chinese military decisionmaking say he would have almost certainly known about the orders.

Troops had massed on both sides of the border in recent months in the northern India region of Ladakh and the southwestern Chinese region of Aksai Chin, causing global concerns of a potential escalation between the two. Private geo-intelligence firm Hawkeye 360 reported last week that satellite imagery from late May showed a buildup on the Chinese side of what appeared to be armed personnel carriers and self-propelled artillery.

[
READ:

India, China Face Off in Deadly Clash ]

Senior leaders from India and China agreed earlier in June to disarmament and a mutual withdrawal from the region, though both sides have accused the other of continuing to ship in and set up equipment required for a sustained military campaign. China has also accused India of building infrastructure such as roads in contested areas Beijing claims as its own.

On June 15, a senior Indian officer and two non-commissioned officers traveled unarmed to a meeting place where they expected to be met by a comparable delegation of Chinese troops to discuss the withdrawal, according to the source familiar with the U.S. assessment of the incident. Instead, dozens of Chinese troops were waiting with spiked bats and clubs and began an attack. Other Indian troops came in to support, leading to a melee that caused more casualties from the improvised weapons, rocks and falls from the steep terrain.

Border guards from both countries have clashed before. The Hong Kong Free Press in 2017 posted video it confirmed as genuine of a similar brawl in a separate part of the contested border.

Chinese officials released few details immediately of Monday's clash. Its state news services first criticized India for the attack and later adopted a more amenable approach.

That changed late last week, following persistent outrage from Indian officials and protests among its population. Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Zhao Lijian in a press conference Friday said blame lay solely with India for a series of what he considered provocative incursions into Chinese territory. He also said Indian leaders had pledged not to cross certain areas of the Galwan River, known as the Line of Actual Control, to build new facilities.

"Shockingly, on the evening of June 15, India's front-line troops, in violation of the agreement reached at the commander-level meeting, once again crossed the Line of Actual Control for deliberate provocation when the situation in the Galwan Valley was already easing, and even violently attacked the Chinese officers and soldiers who went there for negotiation, thus triggering fierce physical conflicts and causing casualties," Zhao Lijian said. "The adventurous acts of the Indian army have seriously undermined the stability of the border areas, threatened the lives of Chinese personnel, violated the agreements reached between the two countries on the border issue, and breached the basic norms governing international relations. China has lodged solemn representations and strong protests to the Indian side."

[
MORE:

China’s Test of the West ]
He added that China hopes India will continue to cooperate to reach new agreements and continue communication and coordination.

Analysts say it's clear the incident did not pan out as China intended, not in the least because its state media outlets have all but erased the incident from their pages in the week since it took place. The U.S. believes Zhao, the Chinese general who commanded the forces involved, held a memorial service for the PLA soldiers who died in the incident – an occasion that would normally attract some form of state-sponsored publicity. Instead, Chinese censors have since cracked down on social media posts about the incident, including ones that mention "defeat" and "humiliation" when describing the dead or injured Chinese troops.

Zhao, who fought with the PLA during its brief but devastating war with Vietnam in 1979, believes Chinese generals mismanaged that conflict, according to the U.S. assessment. He was also involved in the Doklam standoff in 2017 along a different part of the China-India border, which ended when Indian troops forcibly pushed back Chinese forces before both countries agreed to a mutual withdrawal.


The U.S. has remained largely quiet about the latest incident – likely reflecting a belief within the Trump administration that India and its vast economic resources are already increasingly turning to the U.S. for support.

Secretary of State Mike Pompeo issued a statement late Thursday night – early Friday morning in New Delhi – posting on Twitter, "We extend our deepest condolences to the people of India for the lives lost as a result of the recent confrontation with China. We will remember the soldiers' families, loved ones, and communities as they grieve."

Reporters asked President Donald Trump about the incident shortly before he left Washington, D.C., Saturday afternoon for a rally in Tulsa, Oklahoma.

"It's a very tough situation. We're talking to India. We're talking to China. They've got a big problem there," he said. "They've come to blows, and we'll see what happens. We'll try and help them out."


Paul D. Shinkman, Senior Writer, National Security

Paul Shinkman is a national security correspondent. He joined U.S. News & World Report in 2012

https://www.usnews.com/news/world-r...ttack-on-indian-troops-in-galwan-river-valley
 
Last edited:
The inside story of how India and China came to blows in the Himalayas
imrs.php

An Indian army convoy drives toward Leh, on a highway bordering China, on June 19 in Gagangir, India. (Yawar Nazir/Getty Images)

By
Barkha Dutt
June 22, 2020 at 12:55 p.m. EDT

On June 15 at 6.30 p.m., Col. Santosh Babu, an Indian army officer from the southern state of Telangana, organized 20 of his men to accompany him on what he thought was a straightforward mission. He’d been informed that the monthlong simmering tension between India and China at different points of the Line of Actual Control (LAC) in Eastern Ladakh was drawing to a close. Military commanders had agreed to “de-escalate"; the Chinese were to withdraw from areas inside Indian territory. His job that evening was to ensure that the two tents erected by the Chinese inside the Galwan Valley (named such by the British for Rasool Galwan, a teenage Indian trekker who helped save their lives in 1895) were taken down, per the negotiated agreement.

The Chinese had installed their tented camp at a position called the Y-Junction, one kilometer below Patrolling Post-14 (PP-14), which marks the edge of the Indian side of the LAC. Nine kilometers below was the Indian Army Base Camp. In other words, there was no ambiguity about the fact that the Chinese had transgressed the LAC.


When Col. Babu arrived at the Y-Junction to execute the agreement, he was flabbergasted to find that soldiers of the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) refused to dismantle the tents. A heated argument followed that soon erupted into fisticuffs. Both sides were armed with assault rifles, but a protocol signed in 1996 disallowed firing shots within two kilometers of the LAC. Ironically, the original intent behind this pact was to avoid escalation of tensions.



In the melee, one of the Chinese soldiers struck Col. Babu with his fists. The attack on the commanding officer triggered an escalation of tempers on the Indian side. They pinned down at least six Chinese soldiers, according to Indian officials. Col. Babu — hurt but at this moment still fully functional — gave orders to ensure that no further harm should come to them. The remaining Chinese soldiers retreated to their side of the LAC, and the Indians began taking down the tents.

Two and half hours later, as the clock struck 9 p.m., the Indians saw PLA troops return down the PP-14 post. This time, according to official sources, they were close to 300 in strength, dressed in protective rubber suits that looked like riot gear and amassing stones as they came down the mountain ridge. “There was nothing spontaneous about it. They came fully prepared for assault,” a senior Indian official told me. Col. Babu wired the base for reinforcements, and 40 soldiers were rushed up.

What followed over the next five hours was, in the words of one soldier, “not just treacherous; but medieval, barbaric and antithetical to what any professional army in the world would do.” The Chinese circumvented the no-guns rule by using crude weapons — batons, rocks, iron rods, long wooden spurs tied together with sharp metal nails — photographs of which leaked onto social media platforms and have been verified by officials. What may have remained a border face-off erupted into a full-blown confrontation when the Chinese used a blunt object to hit Col. Babu on the head. On the jagged mountain peaks, in the pitch dark, the commanding officer fell (several witnesses say he was pushed), taking a vertical tumble of at least 20 feet.



In India’s army ethos, loyalty to the “paltan,” or battalion, is everything. As a unit, the paltan derives its colors, war cry, greeting and even drinking songs from its regiment. They say, at war, the honor of your regiment will often come ahead of even love for your country.

When the Indian soldiers saw their commanding officer fall in front of their eyes, they went for the jugular. They were grossly outnumbered: Some had been injured and pulled back to the base, while others had to clamber down the ridges to retrieve the body of their commanding officer. By the end, 30 Indian soldiers were battling 250 Chinese troops in bloody hand-to-hand combat, according to government officials. As they fought in sub-zero temperatures, stones began to unravel from the mountainside and the soil came loose. Several soldiers fell into the gush of the Galwan River. Twenty Indian lives were lost that night in the line of duty.

In the chaos, the Chinese soldiers who had been held back by the Indians escaped. No shots were fired by either side. Apart from the protocol, because of the eyeball-to-eyeball nature of the battle, pulling out a gun could have meant that “friendly fire” would kill one of their own. But 12 PLA soldiers, including the battalion’s commanding officer, were killed, according to official Indian sources.



It was the middle of the night by the time senior commanders from both countries worked the hotline and the fight was brought to a close. But as the Chinese left, they took 10 Indian soldiers with them. As morning broke, Chinese helicopters landed on their side of PP-14 and traveled down till the Y-Junction inside India, for the third time, to take their fatalities back. It would be 60 more hours of negotiations before India would get its soldiers back.

By going against the code of war, the Chinese, in a single night, have made India reset its relationship. The rage is unprecedented. A prominent Ladakhi educationist, Sonam Wangchuk, told me, “China is a rogue nation, ethically, politically and morally; the boycott needs to start now."

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opin...e-story-how-india-china-came-blows-himalayas/
 
Americans shit stirring from the sidelines.
They can't believe their luck.

India get ready to do more.
 
As usual China remains an international pariah state. It behaved childishly at the head of an order by General Zhao Zongqi to attack unarmed Indian troops with rocks, rods and stones. China deserves a lesson.

India should take this opportunity to take full control of Ladakh. It is part of South Asia.
 
Last edited:
Believe me if there were any Chinese fatalities.Then chances of handing over ten Indian soldier alive were almost zero .:agree:
 
Believe me if there were any Chinese fatalities.Then chances of handing over ten Indian soldier alive were almost zero .:agree:
Why should a Pakistani feel hurt even if Chinese troops are also killed or wounded? Chinese started the problem by killing unarmed IA troops. You have to be at least neutral in any such situation.

There are fair and unfair things. Chinese troops wanted to instill fear to IA and India and now China should suffer the consequence. Its policy everywhere is to grab others' land and sea by showing 3,000 year old maps. If all of us follow Chinese examples, we all have to go back to Africa where Homo Sapiens was born.
 
Why should a Pakistani feel hurt even if Chinese troops are also killed or wounded? Chinese started the problem by killing unarmed IA troops. You have to be at least neutral in any such situation.

There are fair and unfair things. Chinese troops wanted to instill fear to IA and India and now China should suffer the consequence. Its policy everywhere is to grab others' land and sea by showing 3,000 year old maps. If all of us follow Chinese examples, we all have to go back to Africa where Homo Sapiens was born.
Why are you so worried about Indians!!!
BTW Who called TERMITES to Bangladeshis!!
https://www.thehindu.com/news/inter...6mJaPBMJ-Xp6bS-QJWumgC-T1kENCnumkSULRzB1MpV6A
 
Well if we believe 56", Chinese never crossed into Indian claimed territory. So how could China be the aggressor?
So either he's lying and China did attack Indians on there side of the LAC or this report is just another one of CIA's brilliant intelligence work.

You can't have it both ways. Chose one or the other cause this report goes completely against what Modi said with his chest swollen to show it is 56"(pun intended).

Why should a Pakistani feel hurt even if Chinese troops are also killed or wounded? Chinese started the problem by killing unarmed IA troops. You have t
Well, first of all if China had lost any soldiers, India would be celebrating for real and from the looks of what's happening with Indian media and their screaming ex Generals, they are in an utter meltdown mode.
And secondly if China had lost soldiers we would feel for them as they are our allies through thick and thin.
 
Last edited:
The inside story of how India and China came to blows in the Himalayas
imrs.php

An Indian army convoy drives toward Leh, on a highway bordering China, on June 19 in Gagangir, India. (Yawar Nazir/Getty Images)

By
Barkha Dutt
June 22, 2020 at 12:55 p.m. EDT

On June 15 at 6.30 p.m., Col. Santosh Babu, an Indian army officer from the southern state of Telangana, organized 20 of his men to accompany him on what he thought was a straightforward mission. He’d been informed that the monthlong simmering tension between India and China at different points of the Line of Actual Control (LAC) in Eastern Ladakh was drawing to a close. Military commanders had agreed to “de-escalate"; the Chinese were to withdraw from areas inside Indian territory. His job that evening was to ensure that the two tents erected by the Chinese inside the Galwan Valley (named such by the British for Rasool Galwan, a teenage Indian trekker who helped save their lives in 1895) were taken down, per the negotiated agreement.

The Chinese had installed their tented camp at a position called the Y-Junction, one kilometer below Patrolling Post-14 (PP-14), which marks the edge of the Indian side of the LAC. Nine kilometers below was the Indian Army Base Camp. In other words, there was no ambiguity about the fact that the Chinese had transgressed the LAC.


When Col. Babu arrived at the Y-Junction to execute the agreement, he was flabbergasted to find that soldiers of the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) refused to dismantle the tents. A heated argument followed that soon erupted into fisticuffs. Both sides were armed with assault rifles, but a protocol signed in 1996 disallowed firing shots within two kilometers of the LAC. Ironically, the original intent behind this pact was to avoid escalation of tensions.



In the melee, one of the Chinese soldiers struck Col. Babu with his fists. The attack on the commanding officer triggered an escalation of tempers on the Indian side. They pinned down at least six Chinese soldiers, according to Indian officials. Col. Babu — hurt but at this moment still fully functional — gave orders to ensure that no further harm should come to them. The remaining Chinese soldiers retreated to their side of the LAC, and the Indians began taking down the tents.

Two and half hours later, as the clock struck 9 p.m., the Indians saw PLA troops return down the PP-14 post. This time, according to official sources, they were close to 300 in strength, dressed in protective rubber suits that looked like riot gear and amassing stones as they came down the mountain ridge. “There was nothing spontaneous about it. They came fully prepared for assault,” a senior Indian official told me. Col. Babu wired the base for reinforcements, and 40 soldiers were rushed up.

What followed over the next five hours was, in the words of one soldier, “not just treacherous; but medieval, barbaric and antithetical to what any professional army in the world would do.” The Chinese circumvented the no-guns rule by using crude weapons — batons, rocks, iron rods, long wooden spurs tied together with sharp metal nails — photographs of which leaked onto social media platforms and have been verified by officials. What may have remained a border face-off erupted into a full-blown confrontation when the Chinese used a blunt object to hit Col. Babu on the head. On the jagged mountain peaks, in the pitch dark, the commanding officer fell (several witnesses say he was pushed), taking a vertical tumble of at least 20 feet.



In India’s army ethos, loyalty to the “paltan,” or battalion, is everything. As a unit, the paltan derives its colors, war cry, greeting and even drinking songs from its regiment. They say, at war, the honor of your regiment will often come ahead of even love for your country.

When the Indian soldiers saw their commanding officer fall in front of their eyes, they went for the jugular. They were grossly outnumbered: Some had been injured and pulled back to the base, while others had to clamber down the ridges to retrieve the body of their commanding officer. By the end, 30 Indian soldiers were battling 250 Chinese troops in bloody hand-to-hand combat, according to government officials. As they fought in sub-zero temperatures, stones began to unravel from the mountainside and the soil came loose. Several soldiers fell into the gush of the Galwan River. Twenty Indian lives were lost that night in the line of duty.

In the chaos, the Chinese soldiers who had been held back by the Indians escaped. No shots were fired by either side. Apart from the protocol, because of the eyeball-to-eyeball nature of the battle, pulling out a gun could have meant that “friendly fire” would kill one of their own. But 12 PLA soldiers, including the battalion’s commanding officer, were killed, according to official Indian sources.



It was the middle of the night by the time senior commanders from both countries worked the hotline and the fight was brought to a close. But as the Chinese left, they took 10 Indian soldiers with them. As morning broke, Chinese helicopters landed on their side of PP-14 and traveled down till the Y-Junction inside India, for the third time, to take their fatalities back. It would be 60 more hours of negotiations before India would get its soldiers back.

By going against the code of war, the Chinese, in a single night, have made India reset its relationship. The rage is unprecedented. A prominent Ladakhi educationist, Sonam Wangchuk, told me, “China is a rogue nation, ethically, politically and morally; the boycott needs to start now."

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opin...e-story-how-india-china-came-blows-himalayas/

How were 90 Indian soldiers injured when it was 30 vs 300?
 
U.S. Intel: China Ordered Attack on Indian Troops in Galwan River Valley
The assessment from U.S. intelligence contradicts China’s timeline of the bloody skirmish in the contested border region last week.


By Paul D. Shinkman, Senior Writer, National Security June 22, 2020, at 1:06 p.m.





More
A SENIOR CHINESE general authorized his forces to attack Indian troops in the Galwan River valley last week, resulting in a brutal skirmish that killed dozens and dramatically escalated tensions between the two Asian powerhouses, according to a U.S. intelligence assessment.

[
READ:

China Adopts Conciliatory Tone With India ]
Gen. Zhao Zongqi, head of the Western Theater Command and among the few combat veterans still serving in the People's Liberation Army, approved the operation along the contested border region of northern India and southwestern China, a source familiar with the assessment says on the condition of anonymity. Zhao, who has overseen prior standoffs with India, has previously expressed concerns that China must not appear weak to avoid exploitation by the United States and its allies, including in New Delhi, the source says, and saw the faceoff last week as a way to "teach India a lesson."

The assessment contradicts China's subsequent assertions about what happened last week. And it indicates the deadly and contentious incident – in which at least 20 Indian and 35 Chinese troops died, and reportedly a handful on each side were captured and subsequently released – was not the result of a tense circumstance that spiraled out of control, as has happened before, but rather a purposeful decision by Beijing to send a message of strength to India.

Yet that plan appears to have backfired, as the incident sparked widespread outrage in India that continues a week later. And Beijing's attempts to make India more amenable to future negotiations, including about contested territory, instead appear to have pushed the economic giant closer to the U.S.

Much is at stake, far beyond territorial control. The U.S. has pressured India for months to back away from employing Chinese tech company Huawei to help build its 5G infrastructure. In the aftermath of last week's incident, Indians were reportedly deleting Chinese social media app TikTok and destroying phones made in China.

"It does the very opposite of what China wanted," the source says. "This is not a victory for China's military."

Officials from India and China were scheduled to meet on Monday to discuss the fallout from the incident. It remains unclear the extent to which Chinese President Xi Jinping was involved in the decisions that led to last week's bloody encounter, though analysts familiar with Chinese military decisionmaking say he would have almost certainly known about the orders.

Troops had massed on both sides of the border in recent months in the northern India region of Ladakh and the southwestern Chinese region of Aksai Chin, causing global concerns of a potential escalation between the two. Private geo-intelligence firm Hawkeye 360 reported last week that satellite imagery from late May showed a buildup on the Chinese side of what appeared to be armed personnel carriers and self-propelled artillery.

[
READ:

India, China Face Off in Deadly Clash ]

Senior leaders from India and China agreed earlier in June to disarmament and a mutual withdrawal from the region, though both sides have accused the other of continuing to ship in and set up equipment required for a sustained military campaign. China has also accused India of building infrastructure such as roads in contested areas Beijing claims as its own.

On June 15, a senior Indian officer and two non-commissioned officers traveled unarmed to a meeting place where they expected to be met by a comparable delegation of Chinese troops to discuss the withdrawal, according to the source familiar with the U.S. assessment of the incident. Instead, dozens of Chinese troops were waiting with spiked bats and clubs and began an attack. Other Indian troops came in to support, leading to a melee that caused more casualties from the improvised weapons, rocks and falls from the steep terrain.

Border guards from both countries have clashed before. The Hong Kong Free Press in 2017 posted video it confirmed as genuine of a similar brawl in a separate part of the contested border.

Chinese officials released few details immediately of Monday's clash. Its state news services first criticized India for the attack and later adopted a more amenable approach.

That changed late last week, following persistent outrage from Indian officials and protests among its population. Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Zhao Lijian in a press conference Friday said blame lay solely with India for a series of what he considered provocative incursions into Chinese territory. He also said Indian leaders had pledged not to cross certain areas of the Galwan River, known as the Line of Actual Control, to build new facilities.

"Shockingly, on the evening of June 15, India's front-line troops, in violation of the agreement reached at the commander-level meeting, once again crossed the Line of Actual Control for deliberate provocation when the situation in the Galwan Valley was already easing, and even violently attacked the Chinese officers and soldiers who went there for negotiation, thus triggering fierce physical conflicts and causing casualties," Zhao Lijian said. "The adventurous acts of the Indian army have seriously undermined the stability of the border areas, threatened the lives of Chinese personnel, violated the agreements reached between the two countries on the border issue, and breached the basic norms governing international relations. China has lodged solemn representations and strong protests to the Indian side."

[
MORE:

China’s Test of the West ]
He added that China hopes India will continue to cooperate to reach new agreements and continue communication and coordination.

Analysts say it's clear the incident did not pan out as China intended, not in the least because its state media outlets have all but erased the incident from their pages in the week since it took place. The U.S. believes Zhao, the Chinese general who commanded the forces involved, held a memorial service for the PLA soldiers who died in the incident – an occasion that would normally attract some form of state-sponsored publicity. Instead, Chinese censors have since cracked down on social media posts about the incident, including ones that mention "defeat" and "humiliation" when describing the dead or injured Chinese troops.

Zhao, who fought with the PLA during its brief but devastating war with Vietnam in 1979, believes Chinese generals mismanaged that conflict, according to the U.S. assessment. He was also involved in the Doklam standoff in 2017 along a different part of the China-India border, which ended when Indian troops forcibly pushed back Chinese forces before both countries agreed to a mutual withdrawal.


The U.S. has remained largely quiet about the latest incident – likely reflecting a belief within the Trump administration that India and its vast economic resources are already increasingly turning to the U.S. for support.

Secretary of State Mike Pompeo issued a statement late Thursday night – early Friday morning in New Delhi – posting on Twitter, "We extend our deepest condolences to the people of India for the lives lost as a result of the recent confrontation with China. We will remember the soldiers' families, loved ones, and communities as they grieve."

Reporters asked President Donald Trump about the incident shortly before he left Washington, D.C., Saturday afternoon for a rally in Tulsa, Oklahoma.

"It's a very tough situation. We're talking to India. We're talking to China. They've got a big problem there," he said. "They've come to blows, and we'll see what happens. We'll try and help them out."


Paul D. Shinkman, Senior Writer, National Security

Paul Shinkman is a national security correspondent. He joined U.S. News & World Report in 2012

https://www.usnews.com/news/world-r...ttack-on-indian-troops-in-galwan-river-valley
Isn't this the same author that claimed 35 Chinese deaths a week ago? Apparently US News is now the first news network to get classified intelligence leaks ... faster than the likes of New York Times, Reuters, CNN, Fox, and BBC. Come on ... no one even reads US News besides its bull**** college rankings.
 
Isn't this the same author that claimed 35 Chinese deaths a week ago? Apparently US News is now the first news network to get classified intelligence leaks ... faster than the likes of New York Times, Reuters, CNN, Fox, and BBC. Come on ... no one even reads US News besides its bull**** college rankings.
Yes Mr stinkman, from USNEWS. Who the fck names their tabloid USNEWS. Its like naming India times IndiaNEWS. Lol
 
So many Indian soldiers silently came to Chinese camp at night. I don't think it's a friendly visit
 
Back
Top Bottom