What's new

U.S : 60% of the warships will be deployed in the Asia-Pacific

Sure thing, buddy...

China's housing bubble deflating - Los Angeles Times

And the bad news goes on and on for China.

The best thing you have going for yourselves here are the much more easily available bad news from US about our own problems. Like the muslims, our problems give you escape from your own.

Your reasoning is circular. You get your ideas from the media, then you tell me what the media says? :lol: In fact, people here say housing prices are still too high.
 
. .
What a fail thread this is. I've been stalking this thread for 15 minutes and nothing but trolling. Shame on you guys.
 
. .
Here I come.

kids, shanghai police force can whip the entire indian army. and in 1967 and 87, china kicked your arse and withdrew.

we kick arse and dont grab territories.
we are not imperialists like india.
we teach lessons. we taught india a humiliating lesson in 1962, 1967, and 1987

Shanghai police? Man this is not kung fu, nor super hero fantasy show, I believe now you will say 1 hans = entier Indian Army, get some real life dude.

Withdrew withdrew withdrew, why withdrew? scared,no confidence, demoralised?
You must know war is fought in battle field but won in hearts and minds of the people, what did poor chinese soilders got in return of battle? just casuality, and trophy lost :lol:
What did Indian Army got in agaisnt of casuality- '' Arunachal Pradesh '' UPTO McMOHAN line which PRC never wished to recognise but have to pull back troops till the line of Mc Mohan line, I pity the sacrifice of the poor PRC soilders :oops:
As a consolation what did PRC got a barren heap !!!! o_O

nah, our police force is enough to humiliate india once again.

i love it when we make a mockery of the indian military.

india is nothing but practice for the PLA.

wow never knew your practice is all about scoring causality and pullback of troops,
A better idea would be lets the battle field be the whole Tibet this time, score casualities for you troops and pull back, we wont stop you to withdraw ;) , later on shout everywhere, that your nation had humilated the enemy, we dont mind as we will have independent Tibet :cheesy:
we were skillful enough to make mince meat outta your rag tag military boy :lol:.

we made a mess of you and to this day, 1962 still stings you.
you have to live with the shock and humilation of that defeat knowing you challenged and lost to a superior country and superior military.
live with the shock, keep it bottled up inside you silently.

Dearly poorly hans, causality is not humiliation but when you don't earn your prize' neither your superior China, nor you kungfu helped in earning Arunachal Pradesh, pity what you troops earned in against of conflict?
it is like :we can but we dont
in reality: we cannot

PRC just uses the better looking terms :lol: :lol: :lol:
 
.
Wrong. China was in Viet Nam to create a communist client state. It was the Viet Minh who invited France back into Viet Nam. Am willing to bet you did not know that either.
Original Post By gambit

Wrong where do you get this BS, US ignored Ho Chi Minhs Request in 1945 and thus aided the french Ho Chi Minh turned to USSR and China, the Viet Minh were simply fighting to rid French rule. your wrong again. difference between colonialism and independence you should know that.
Original Post By Hu Songshan
Ho

Ho Chi Minh and Jean Sainteny were good friends. Some would even say close friends. Both men negotiated the agreement while Ho was in a working vacation in France staying at Sainteny's home. Look at the date and see how soon it was from the end of WW II.

Feeling and looking foolish now?
Lie again , again....and again ?? Poor Gambit , haizz:no:
The French troop porposed to Chiang Kai-shek that their relinquish the old French concession in Shanghai and other Chinese ports in exchange for allowing French troop to replace the Chinese forces north of the 16th parallel .After Chiang accepted the offer , Lu Han's army departed early in 1946 . Ho then was faces with prospect of French return to Northern VN, and some of Ho collaborators urged him to order the VMLA to fight. Instead, he decided to try negotiation first and to resort to war only as last resor
http://www.defence.pk/forums/military-forum/43913-worlds-best-special-forces-10.html#post2590374
 
.
pretty much like 1962, 1 chinese soldier can kill 10 indian soldiers.

the kill ratio is actually opposite.
u should really try standup comedy, you'll earn far more.

if we want that piece of land, we can do another 1962 and keep it this time.
no need, it has no resources.
^sour grape mentality?? what happens when it becomes another chola skirmish?? would uncle wen tell you this time??
the teenage huffing n puffing doesn't help your cause, it actually makes u look like a tool
 
. .
the kill ratio is actually opposite.
u should really try standup comedy, you'll earn far more.


^sour grape mentality??
the teenage huffing n puffing doesn't help your cause, it actually makes u look like a tool

wrong, it is your incompetence that you could not get as many soldiers over flat land to Tibet vs. China which has much longer supply lines.

India shares more in common with African countries. You can't even beat North Korea in basic economic indicators and I'm pretty sure North Korea's military is stronger than India's for its mission.
 
.
no one even talks about AP in chinese media.
only in indian and maybe western media.

we are interested in surpassing the US, we dont care about jokes like india.

if we want that piece of land, we can do another 1962 and keep it this time.
no need, it has no resources.

Again modification of terms, a simple straight forward term would be CCP controlled media.
 
.
we were skillful enough to make mince meat outta your rag tag military boy :lol:.

we made a mess of you and to this day, 1962 still stings you.
you have to live with the shock and humilation of that defeat knowing you challenged and lost to a superior country and superior military.
live with the shock, keep it bottled up inside you silently.

This is really stupid comment...You are right we got defeated in 62 but then it is also true that PLA retreat because their supply lines got stretched...However we learned our lessons and got better prepared...67 and 87 accounts for that...They remained skirmishes because this time India was more prepared then to the likings of the dragon...

IMHO we have moved beyond a point where a conflict is more detrimental to both os us then the benefits that victory will bring to one of us...AP is not going to give China more rewards then what she will loose in a conflict with India...Same is true for us...Aksai Chin will not give us much then what we are going to loose should a conflict start...In short chill and enjoy the benefits of peace($65 billion and still counting...)
 
.
^exactly, we are a status quo power and happy with what we have.

wrong, it is your incompetence that you could not get as many soldiers over flat land to Tibet vs. China which has much longer supply lines

geez why would we bring any boots to Tibet? We are not claiming it.
at least try to use logic.
 
.
^exactly, we are a status quo power and happy with what we have.



geez why would bring any boots to Tibet? We are not claiming it.
at least try to use logic.

you invaded Tibet in the forward policy with short supply lines. we utterly defeated you with tactical maneuvers to achieve local numerical supremacy despite much longer supply lines.

time and time it has been shown that there's nothing Indians can do about China.
 
.
why cant india ever beat china at anything?
why are you always behind china?

we beat u in war.
we beat u in economy.
we beat u in financial power.
we beat u in sports.

why is india so inferior to china in everything?
is it the indian culture?

Wow coooool diverting the tropic discussed, naughty little hans ;)
 
. .

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom