My dear all I am asking is that how a person who claims to be struggling for the establishment of an Islamic state can appoint a Qadiani as the first foreign minister of that state and then appoint a Hindu as its 1st law minister who will ensure the Islamic state's adherence to Quranic law? I think this is either too funny or true tragic to be true.
Sadly the Jinnah fans and apologists have no answers to these bitter truths which will keep haunting them all their lives.
No one is being apologist but you, what you pointed proves nothing otherwise, while we have Pakistan movement in front of our eyes.
It is you few falling from the sky and writing new history from behind the curtains.
Quaid cannot tell every thing, how you shall live, but what ever he stated or did was in conformity of Islamic system and in connection with state operations.
Quaid, forbade of discrimination and state involvement in religion, but freedom of religion within the bounds of mosques, mandir and church. Which shall not be confused with chanting bhajans in street. or wearing sectarian signs, while being at state duty.
In the same speech, he demanded to
tackle black marketing, corruption and bribery with iron hand (and yet we had Mr.10% as President) while, in Quran black marketing, corruption and bribery is declared haram at many occasions.
Prophet Mohammad (pbuh) was titled as Sadiq and Amin by his enemies.
Jinnah termed nepotism and jobbery (same as robbery) as great evil and yet we have fake degree holder as President. Administering oath to Cheap justice but no pointing to that.
What ever Quaid practically did or said, only confirm Islamic values and beliefs. but as long you agree to implement what ever Quaid demanded from us, in his words and actions. if you like, you can name it what ever.
But you cannot legalize corruption, nepotism, injustice, homosexuality etc and sell it as secular and re-define ideology of Pakistan by tempering the words of Quaid and putting it in new text books.
What about the Pakistan studies we passed and our parents passed?
w/r to the personalities you mentioned, we cannot tell how much a person was related to which religion but Pakistan was made in the name of Islam and Muslim league was the name of the party, which was the key.
Today's free media also tells us that Musharaf and Kiyani were Ahmadi, but no one talk about the majority atheist under the cover of secular.
Problem of today's Pakistan is that atheist a.k.a seculars think that every Muslim is as idiot as the people of rural areas, interior sindh, south punjab and larger Baluchistan!
No Sir, actually topics like this force us to study about Islam and buy books and translations to discover our selves and this world.
FYI, Quran is not a sort of law, it mainly is a system of life?
May be we shall ask all the secular cum atheists, why only today they are jumping up and down and not in yesteryears and why in secular cum hindu india Muslims are forced to live with hindu names and cannot celebrate eid ul adha, as we do in Pakistan!
