Pak Nationalist
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Jul 4, 2021
- Messages
- 1,012
- Reaction score
- 3
- Country
- Location
Kashmiri resistance is fighting with 9mms and being butchered as could be expected. When institutions do not remain accountable to the public, these are the consequences. This culture of making army chiefs larger than life, promoting their "vision", engineering public opinion about some lofty doctrines when they take the office using compromised journalists is bearing full fruits now. At all fronts, we are at the receiving end. The enemy openly tells its public that it is the reason Pakistan is on the grey list. It attacks the heart of the Pakistani financial sector (PSX) in broad daylight, targets the ambassador of another country on our land (we allow it like a banana republic), targets the workforce working on a strategic project, the list stating enemy's impunity and one-sided attrition is long. Most profound is intelligence failure. Intelligence is not able to prevent these attacks from happening. Own response has become nonexistent, but that could be due to institutional decisions ("Bajwa doctrine"/infinite pacifism).Enemy casualties in IOK at the lowest
Own casualties in FATA and Balochistan reaching new records
Good work Bajwa doctrine
Bullseye!Ina lila, for the victims.
I dont understand the mods on these threads, why ban and delete posts just because you dont like them.
Does this have forum have no free speech ?, or people can only say goody good stuff, and everyone must keep eyes close to whats the ground situation.
For last few months Pakistan has gotten almost daily attacks and almost atleast lost 1 soldier.
You still dont see single actual statement about the situation.
People here are rejoicing that these are the after affects of India getting weaker in Afghanistan.
How are they getting weaker if they are carrying out daily attacks inside Pakistani state, killing Pakistani soldiers what are organisations and police force are doing ?
Unless military top brass has just taken a blind eye to whole situation as it doesn't affect to them so who cares,
Since Bajwa's extension hes been more involved in politics instead of doing actual job.
What ever you people say , i only see dark days for next atleast 5 to 10 years, as Pakistan will see suddenly influx of refugees come to Pakistan and i m sure Pakistan will accept these namak harams, which will fuel more crime & terrorism in Pakistan, Military(top brass) and All political parties are involved in this.
If this is weakness, I wonder what strength looks like. Telling oneself stories and then believing in them hoping these stories turn out to be true has become the norm for many of our compatriots. They shy away from asking tough questions lest they be getting embroiled in 5GW against their own country. This lack of critical voices would not allow the status quo to be changed. The same security apparatus had the capacity to dismantle the terrorist infrastructure under Raheel Shareef. Have those capabilities atrophied under the current chief? If so, what are the causes? An individual could be involved in politics (politicized), but do his subordinates or the institution lose focus if the priorities of the institutional head lie elsewhere? If the answer is in affirmation, we must not allow politicization of our natsec institutions in the future at any cost. I don't see things changing on that account in the short term, unfortunately. Our national security institutions should acquire this wisdom at the institutional level for times to come that getting embroiled in politics compromises their core competencies IF the above is true. Civilian leaders can force this change only if they are able to offer better governance, so the public stops looking at other forces. Hence, institutional recognition remains the most viable option considering that civilian leadership is not yet able to win public confidence at the back of performance since 2007.
Last edited: