Two billion Muslims do nothing Shame. Retired General Asim munier is only man in 2 billions with atomic bomb

[VCheng]

Let me take this point by point:

First, let's look at Islamic history: 1,400 years ago, Muslim Arabs started with nothing, yet they created one of the greatest empires in history. They faced immense challenges but overcame them through unity, faith, and strong leadership. This historical example shows that when a nation is determined and united, it can achieve greatness despite seemingly insurmountable odds.

And yet that is all history for the simple reason that all that greatness that once existed was all lost and is long gone. It is a different world.

Secondly, consider more recent examples. Afghanistan, a small nation, managed to defeat two of the world’s largest military powers—first the Soviet Union, and then the American-led NATO forces. Despite the overwhelming might of these empires, the Afghan people stood their ground and ultimately triumphed. Similarly, Vietnam, though small and under-resourced, successfully resisted and defeated the United States during the Vietnam War. These examples illustrate that size and power are not the only factors that determine the outcome of conflicts; determination, resilience, and the will of the people are equally, if not more, important.

Afghanistan is a destroyed society living in piles of rubble, with only drug dealing and smuggling enabling it to survive. And Vietnam's biggest trading partner is the same USA. Neither is a very good example of what you are trying to say.

Now, addressing the question of whether Pakistan can face the consequences of standing up to Israel: With a population of 250 million and the fourth-largest army in the world, Pakistan has the strength to withstand significant pressure. If the people are united and stand behind their leadership, they can endure any diplomatic or economic challenges that may arise. As Sultan Tipu famously said, "One day's life of a lion is better than a hundred years ' life of a jackal."

A population of 250 million with no health, education or social development with an army that is more for a security state that power projection simply is not enough to give Pakistan any meaningful strength. Unity and leadership cannot achieve anything without a functioning economy. Otherwise it will end up like Sultan Tipu: a lion, perhaps, but definitely defeated and dead.

Moreover, it's important to understand that I'm not suggesting Pakistan should threaten Israel directly. What I'm saying is that Pakistan can leverage its power in diplomacy. A nation with such resources should not be afraid to assert itself on the global stage. In any major conflict, whether it is diplomatic, economic, or military, a nation must have leadership with the heart of a lion. In History, both Islamic and Western worlds are full of examples of brave leaders who led their nations to victory, and they are remembered with pride. We must choose between bravery and slavery because, in the end, nothing is permanent. If we must die, why not live like lions rather than as jackals?

Pakistan has no diplomatic gravitas. NONE. At all. And international geopolitics has simply no concept of bravery or lion-heartedness. Those noble concepts belong in historical fables, and apply in personal domains only.

As for standing up against diplomatic and economic pressure, Pakistan can build alliances with other nations that share its interests. By strengthening ties with other Muslim-majority countries and fostering partnerships with nations that are wary of Israeli aggression, Pakistan can create a diplomatic buffer. Economically, Pakistan can work towards self-reliance and diversify its trade partnerships to reduce dependence on Western powers. This way, even if sanctions or other economic pressures are applied, the country can maintain its stability and continue to assert its sovereignty.

Pakistan will fall like a house of cards in three days given the state of its economy and society. Pakistan is a mere bystander in the Middle East.

In my opinion Pakistan has the potential to withstand and overcome the consequences of standing up for its principles, provided if it has strong, courageous leadership and the unwavering support of its people. But I am afraid USA will allow Pakistan to have rightful person in office. They will use asim munir as toilet paper, they will use him and throw him in a bin. Reason why they disposed and prison imran khan. Man is lion heart. You can disagree with his politics but man is truly fighting for his country and people and understands west more then anyone else in Pakistan.

Oh the irony. You want Pakistan to realize its potential to be strong and independent and yet also accept that it has no strength to govern itself internally. You can adulate IK all you want. His time came and went. The country goes on as it is designed to as before. Even if he comes back into power, the fundamentals as I have mentioned above will not change for several decades at least.

 

[Novus ordu seclorum]

Agree. They not Muslims

That means Arab rulers reverted to tyrannical rule early on, but we know there were few leaders after the Prophet who followed Quran and Sunnah - examples are Abu Bakr, Omar, Usman, Ali, Hassan, and Hussein. They were inspired and trained by the Prophet, were similar to the Prophet (and to each other) in faith and practise. The latter three were obviously the closest to him.

Were they recommending to drink camel piss like the Hadith says about the Prophet or marrying 9 year olds? No, therefore, some Hadith are dubious and cannot be taken as templates for leadership, faith, values, and practise. There are Hadith which say to be slaves to the ruler, practically worship him. If it wasn't for clarifiying and guiding verses in the Quran, Muslims would be lost.