What's new

TURNING POINT IN THE HISTORY OF INDIAN SUBCONTINENT

That in effect disproves the Out of India theory.

Time is highly relative bro.

What is many millenia compared to the advent of modern man, Homo erectus?

Ultimately everybody is from Africa, it is said.
 
Aryans were not Hindu. The Aryans encircled Iran in Center and the diameter was from France to North East India. North East India only. Searched in Wikipedia and related everything. You used to be fked by Iranians.


What is the religion of Aryans??

Did indigenous Indians fked Aryans to convert to Hinduism.

:blah:
 
Aryans were not Hindu. The Aryans encircled Iran in Center and the diameter was from France to North East India. North East India only. Searched in Wikipedia and related everything. You used to be fked by Iranians.

persians r the greatest warrior race of asia.
 
Aryans were not Hindu. The Aryans encircled Iran in Center and the diameter was from France to North East India. North East India only. Searched in Wikipedia and related everything. You used to be fked by Iranians.

Your language does your flag no favors.

But even in ***** one sometimes finds something of use.

Is the Out of India revisionism motivated less by Islam and more to do with Hinduism probably being next in line to, somehow progenitored by the Persian Aryan race?

The race to be THE oldest faith perhaps?

As an extrapolate of the oldest people?

Just loose hypotheses currently ......
 
Aryans were not Hindu. The Aryans encircled Iran in Center and the diameter was from France to North East India. North East India only. Searched in Wikipedia and related everything. You used to be fked by Iranians.

Wikipedia says so?
 
Aryans were not Hindu. The Aryans encircled Iran in Center and the diameter was from France to North East India. North East India only. Searched in Wikipedia and related everything. You used to be fked by Iranians.

well they were if not then why was rig ved written in sub continent why not the as they say central asia and horses which was aryans gift to subcontinent as many western so called intelectuals believe we had horses worshipped and used as domestik help as much as 1500 years before so called "Aryan inveders" arrived from central asia and there are many clues and artifacts found in IVC ruins that Shiv lingams and hroses were part of daily life in IVC google it ...aryan invasion bogey was created by western masters as there subjects of the sub continent alawys think of britishers as the better race and more intelectual and developed what they were already
 
Actually 60000 years for the ASI & 40000 + years for the ANI. After the intermingling, the studies say that the population has been stable for 40000 years.

That's still 20,000 years bro. :)
 
Your language does your flag no favors.

But even in ***** one sometimes finds something of use.

Is the Out of India revisionism motivated less by Islam and more to do with Hinduism probably being next in line to, somehow progenitored by the Persian Aryan race?

The race to be THE oldest faith perhaps?

Just loose hpotheses currently ......

Zoroastrianism
Zurvanism: By late Achaemenid times, Zoroastrianism was also evident as Zurvanism (Zurvanite Zoroastrianism), a monist dualism that had a following as late as the Sassanid era.
Mandaeism: A gnostic monotheism of (at the latest) the 1st century CE observed Mandā d-Heyyi - "Knowledge of Life". Mandaean theology is based more on a common heritage than on any set of religious creeds and doctrines.
Manichaeism: 3rd century ditheistic gnosticism that may have been influenced by Mandaeism. Manichaens believed in a "Father of Greatness" (Aramaic: Abbā dəRabbūṯā, Persian: pīd ī wuzurgīh) and observed Him to be the highest deity (of light).
Mazdakism: A late 5th/early 6th century proto-socialist gnosticism that sought to do away with private property
 
Centum_Satem_map.png



This will just show you who fked whom. Hinduism was some form taken from Zoroastrians who had some elements of Sub-Gods. Indians used to believe in polytheism and they had started to pray those figures of Zoro. From that, later the evolution of Hinduism.

Source wiki
 
Your language does your flag no favors.

But even in ***** one sometimes finds something of use.

Is the Out of India revisionism motivated less by Islam and more to do with Hinduism probably being next in line to, somehow progenitored by the Persian Aryan race?

The race to be THE oldest faith perhaps?

As an extrapolate of the oldest people?

Just loose hypotheses currently ......

relax its not about religion. bengalis r also an indo aryan race. doesnt that means our ancestors been ****** 2

those were ancient times people used 2 b barbaric those days
 
point is north indians r hybrids of invaders n locals

same goes for pakistanis they r hybrids of invaders n IVC locals

end of discussion...
 
May be nobody will mind this post, not that it matters; however

What is the use of digging old graves?? The single most important lesson from Indian History or for that matter any one's is u fall when u are divided.

There is a proverb in Telugu "Ma tatalu netulu tagaru ma mutulu vasana chudandi" while it may not be exactly apt it does point to the irony. It literally means "Our forefathers drank ghee, please smell our lips". There is no point in forever delving in past unless we learn something either from ignominy or laurels.

Don't be dejected today for the past ignominy or rest on the past laurels. Look at your status today and plan for future. Take care u do not repeat the past mistakes.

The number of threads on this past thing is stomach churning to say the least. Leave it guys.
 
That's still 20,000 years bro. :)

:woot: Now what? the Aryans came way back then? The Aryan theory is a funny one, constantly changing to keep up with the facts. The Iranians can't be dated to Iran (does not mean they weren't there though) beyond the 9th century BCE (Assyrian sources) and only much later in Central Asia. The geography of the Avesta is the eastern Iran (western Iran is completely unknown) and the Indian subcontinent (till the Punjab) & Afghanistan. Makes you wonder, doesn't it?
 
point is north indians r hybrids of invaders n locals

same goes for pakistanis they r hybrids of invaders n IVC locals

end of discussion...

Firstly, as Joe and later Bang pointed out, there was NO invasion.

It was wave upon wave over a pretty long time. Human migration.

Secondly, do not fall into the crap pedled by Pakistanis desperate for non-Hindu non-Indian roots.

The IVC were probably annihilated, absorbed, or driven deep down east and south - again by a later one of the same waves.
 
Back
Top Bottom