What's new

Turkmenistan signs deal for gas pipeline to Pakistan, India

PakShah

FULL MEMBER
Joined
May 21, 2011
Messages
1,563
Reaction score
-1
Turkmenistan signs deal for gas pipeline to Pakistan, India
Reuters | 15 hours ago


tapi-ap-543670.jpg

Indian Petroleum Minister Murli Deora, Pakistani President Asif Ali Zardari, Turkmen President Gurbanguli Berdymukhamedov and Afghan President Hamid Karzai, from left, shake hands during a meeting in Ashgabat, Turkmenistan.—AP Photo

AVAZA: Turkmenistan agreed on Wednesday to supply natural gas to Pakistan and India in deals that offer major economic benefits but depend on building and defending a US-backed pipeline across chronically unstable Afghanistan.

The route, particularly the 735-km leg through the Afghan provinces of Herat and Kandahar, will need billions of dollars in funding. It faces significant security problems as the Western Nato alliance plans to hand control of Afghanistan to Kabul’s own security forces by the middle of next year.

Turkmenistan’s state gas company Turkmengaz signed gas sales and purchase agreements with Pakistan’s Inter State Gas Systems and Indian state-run utility GAIL.

“The implementation of this project will give a powerful impetus to the social and economic development of all the participant countries,” Turkmen Deputy Prime Minister Baimurad Hojamukhamedov said before the signing ceremony in Avaza on the Caspian Sea.

India and Pakistan are both hungry for gas supplies and Turkmenistan, formerly part of the Soviet Union, is keen to free itself from reliance on gas exports to Russia.

Lilit Gevorgyan, analyst at IHS Global Insight, said that while the pipeline could be a lucrative commercial project, it would run through more than one high security risk country, “which puts the actual construction under a big question mark”.

The idea of the TAPI pipeline, an acronym formed from the initials of the four countries through which it would pass, was first raised in the mid-1990s but construction has yet to begin.

Turkmen officials have said the proposed 1,735-km pipeline could carry 1 trillion cubic metres of gas over a 30-year period, or 33 billion cubic metres a year.

Turkmenistan, a desert country of 5.5 million which borders Iran, is viewed by human rights bodies as one of the world’s most secretive and repressive countries.

But Turkmen President Kurbanguly Berdymukhamedov, who has a growing personality cult, has moved in recent years to warm ties with the West, whose political support and investment he needs to lay alternative gas export routes.

Security and costs

The major obstacle to the project is the stretch of pipeline that will run through Afghanistan. Nato set an “irreversible” course out of Afghanistan on Monday but US President Barack Obama admitted its plan to end the deeply unpopular war in 2014 was fraught with dangers.

A Nato summit in Chicago endorsed an exit strategy that calls for handing control of Afghanistan to its security forces next year but left questions unanswered about how to prevent a slide into chaos and a resurgence of the Taliban after allied troops are gone.

“Ultimately we believe that all the challenges, including security challenges that the project faces, can be managed or overcome,” Daniel Stein, senior adviser to the US State Department’s special envoy for Eurasian energy, told Reuters in Avaza on Wednesday. He did not elaborate.

But IHS Global Insight’s Gevorgyan wrote in comments to Reuters that “the project had a slim fighting chance in the past decade as Nato was still in Afghanistan”.

“With the Western troops’ pullout by 2014 from the still volatile Afghanistan, building an expensive pipeline in country with very weak central government seems almost unattainable.”

The Asian Development Bank said the TAPI pipeline was estimated to cost at least $7.6 billion in 2008. Analysts and officials now say it could cost between $10 billion and $12 billion to construct.

Strained ties between nuclear powers India and Pakistan is another source of concern.

“Given the animosity between the two countries, if TAPI is ever to be built it is likely to be a high-value target in Pakistan, where a number of religious fundamentalist groups will ensure that no energy supply enters India through their territory,” Gevorgyan wrote.

In Avaza, Pakistani Petroleum and Natural Resources Minister Asim Hussain showed optimism. “We will forget our past,” he said. “Let bygone be bygone and let’s move into the future.”

Turkmenistan is promoting TAPI as a key element in plans to boost annual gas exports to 180 billion cubic metres by 2030.

BP data show Turkmenistan’s natural gas reserves equal to those of Saudi Arabia and behind only Russia, Iran and Qatar.

The country aims to supply gas from its Galkynysh field, better known by its previous name, South Iolotan. Auditor Gaffney, Cline & Associates has ranked the field the world’s second largest, with gas reserves of between 13.1 trillion and 21.2 trillion cubic metres.

The Indian government said in a statement on May 17 that the pipeline would be operational in 2018. India and Pakistan would each get 38 million cubic metres per day (mcmd) of gas, while the remaining 14 mcmd would be supplied to Afghanistan, it said.

Turkmenistan signs deal for gas pipeline to Pakistan, India | DAWN.COM
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Why did the PPP allow a deal to include India in the equation. If anything India should be punished for its injustices against Kashmir, Pakistan, and China!

I hope the new government that comes in power in Pakistan doesn't include India in any deal with Turkmenistan.
 
.
IP(I) is a better deal. U.S. wants Pakistan to abandon IP(I) because of Iran and go for TAPI.
 
.
I think Pakistan should opt for both the projects. Such a strategy diversifies the Risk to Pakistan so that no one country can threaten to turn off the tap or blackmail Pakistan.
 
.
I think Pakistan should opt for both the projects. Such a strategy diversifies the Risk to Pakistan so that no one country can trreaten to turn off the tap to blackmail Pakistan.

But why should the Turkmen gas go to India? The Turkmen gas can to China instead. A TAPC and an IPC sounds like in our interests.
 
.
I think Pakistan should opt for both the projects. Such a strategy diversifies the Risk to Pakistan so that no one country can trreaten to turn off the tap to blackmail Pakistan.

The problem is that Afghanistan is not a stable country. When U.S. and NATO leave Afghanistan then only Allah knows who will rule Afghanistan. And Turkmenistan gas is too expensive.

Iranians are offering Pakistan gas in cheaper price and the Iranians are practically building the gas pipeline without Pakistan laying a finger.
 
.
Good news. :cheers:

Why did the PPP allow a deal to include India in the equation. If anything India should be punished for its injustices against Kashmir, Pakistan, and China!

Woohoo!!! I'm so scared. :fie:

Save thy wrath upon me, O ye mighty one. :argh:
 
. . . .
lol, give me a break you know what I mean.;) You are Bush's counterweight to China. ;)
In essence India is a pawn state. lol. :lol:
But you have been their pawn for all your life. And now china is on the way to replace USA for you.

Anyways, I believe that the deal with Iran was much better.
 
.
Shame !~! Just Bcoz of America They didn't sign the IP deal .... while Iran already completed their side work till border !!

Shame on Pakistani Govt !
 
.
bad bad decesion!
ony way it can be justified is that we also go for IP or IPI gas pipeline, we cannot let our power inflow run through afghanistan and complete relay on that since the situation in afghanistan may get worse in times to come. also the current puppet government is not very friendly to Pakistan and are more close to India!

Iran have done most of the work on there side of border, it is also very close to Sui, the place from where all of Pakistan Gas flos are comming so just need to connect it to Sui and its all up and runing

we MUST ALSO GO AHEAD WITH IPI!
 
.
This pipeline have no future.Afgan is war zone and it will be after nato withdrawal.Neither pakistan will get gas nor india.
 
. .
But why should the Turkmen gas go to India? The Turkmen gas can to China instead. A TAPC and an IPC sounds like in our interests.


Whether it goes to China or India, Pakistan gets a royalty anytime the pipeline passes through Pakistani territory and that is the main point. Anytime a pipeline passes through Pakistani territory to go to a third country, we get a piece of the pie.
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom