LegionnairE
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Apr 18, 2010
- Messages
- 7,140
- Reaction score
- -4
- Country
- Location
Last edited by a moderator:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
dr_okuz from WAFF
some substantial info about our Meko s and multiple engagement capability
1. Not only Barbaros-B but also Barbaros-A also getting Mk41 VLS + SmartSMk2 combination. And unlike Grik meko new 3-D SmartS radar can provide "interrupted guidance" for ESSM, which means time share illumination of ESSM missile, each STIR radar can guide 4 ESSM missile. Which also means each Barbaros class can simultanously engage 8 target, while grik Hydra Class can guide ony 2 missile with any given time. So Barbaros Class has 4 times effective than coldwar era tech Hydra Class.
2. Turkish MEKO Class equipped with Harpoon Block-II missile, which can attack totally complex scenerious, is much more superior than Grik Harpoon Block-1C. In short Turkish MEKO is better than Hydra on ASuW
3. Turkish MEKO can carry latest S-70 Seahawk, which is techinally better than, grik seahawk; and Turkish frigate can fire Mk54 torpedos, in short Turkish MEKO ASW capability musch superior than Grik Hydra Class
4. Turkish MEKO Class, has military SATCOM capability, HF over IP communication system, Link16 and Link11 CAVLIS; upgraded ASELSAN GPS/INS suite, Warship-AIS which is indigneous, etc.. So Turkish MEKO has better communication-identification suite.
4. And we have complete modernization for MEKA200 TrackI
.Upgrade of SeaZenith, with ASELSAN optics, and radar digitaliziation (which is done)
.Upgraded communication navigation suite.
. Most importantly new ASELSAN WARSHIP EW SYSTEM that includes:
*Active Phased Array Jammer (2 jammers, with 2 transmitter array)
*Expandble Jammer and launcher system
*MKE 130mm chaff-flare launchers
*New ESM system
*Laser Warning Device, that is used in Milgem
*IRST that is showed in IDEF-11
*Floating decoy
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
First if you have sufficent timely presice computer system (time share for spesific duties) and make complex wave form to transmitters, you can midcourse guide ESSM/SM-2 Missile, while you would need Mk99 FCS for illumination. This case is AEIGS!
Second, if your radar proccessing system is not that "smart" you can do some other things. If you have good CMS system like GENESIS that control 3D and FCS radars you can do multiple engagement with out need of "mid-course links"
In this case, you detect-track and find engagement envelope for multiple target; than you can fire ESSM missile for each target with intertial guidance only, missile accelarte to direction, than you can switch missile terminal illumination one-by one controlled by GENESIS; but this has limitation comparing to AEIGS.
ICWI is another thing, I used on purpose but it is not the thing that are used in APAR radar, where radar itself send pencil beams both for midcourse and terminal homing, on interrupted time share. This is the spesific for that Radar, also used in Austaralian OHP modernization.
Our MEKO's multiple engagement is different, let say it can fire 2 missile to one target, if the first missile is failed, than STIR can guide other missile which is on the way.
So, multiple engagement is related with "system" rather than radar if the radars are not AESA; so you cannot find a document related to Smart-S Mk2 radars with multiple engagement. Similarly you cannot find a document that states SPY-1 Radar can engage multiple target, so it cant, but as a system AEIGS can.
WAFF | Greece & Turkey Defence Forum | World's Armed Forces Forum: Greek Meko vs Turkish Meko
Missiles and rockets with range beyond 300km violate some international treaties. for example Russia reduced the range of SS26 stone (Iskander) missiles in export versions. SM3 has a range of 500km based on wiki. US could not export it.
Missiles and rockets with range beyond 300km violate some international treaties. for example Russia reduced the range of SS26 stone (Iskander) missiles in export versions. SM3 has a range of 500km based on wiki. US could not export it.
Hey guys after the declaration of ÇAFRAD, I've found this. A ÇAFRAD integrated design;
That is a take on the Italian Fincantieri design F-3000 from the 1980s
My point again,Milgem stealth design proven concept(2300tns).
Enlarge it to 6000/7000tns,put all the AAW systems on it and be done.
Why isnt that possible,why a new design?
What needs to be different?
CABATLI,can you give me a clear answer.ty
nice one. They seem similar. But...awg RMK had inspired from Ada-class corvette (milgem) to create TF-2000 .
Agree. Still, I'm struck by the design similarity with the (never built) Italian design.
Agree. Still, I'm struck by the design similarity with the (never built) Italian design.