AKINCI
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Apr 17, 2010
- Messages
- 868
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If it happens it'll be a great time saver, we won't have to wait for the TF2000. But it's only 4 destroyers unless we can integrate SM3s to our Genesis combat management system. If we do that, it'll change the power balance in the Mediterranean forever.
If it happens it'll be a great time saver, we won't have to wait for the TF2000. But it's only 4 destroyers unless we can integrate SM3s to our Genesis combat management system. If we do that, it'll change the power balance in the Mediterranean forever.
Destroyers cost a hell of a lot more. I'm still skeptical about a direct procurement, Why can't we just wait for TF2000? Either it'll be an ex-USN Arleigh Burke class which can be problematic, or a brand new Zumwalt class which doesn't make sense.TF-2000s will use AEGIS and SM-3 probably only APAR and sonar will be domestic parts of them. I was thinking about why don't we build more destroyers to protect our airspace more effectively with SM-3s which have 500 km range instead of affording 3 billion $ to inferior patriot batteries.
Destroyers cost a hell of a lot more. I'm still skeptical about a direct procurement, Why can't we just wait for TF2000? Either it'll be an ex-USN Arleigh Burke class which can be problematic, or a brand new Zumwalt class which doesn't make sense.
I also don't believe the force will abandon Genesis for foreign Aegis. Doesn't make sense to me. What we need is the integration of SM2s and SM3s to Genesis combat management system.
Destroyers cost a hell of a lot more. I'm still skeptical about a direct procurement, Why can't we just wait for TF2000? Either it'll be an ex-USN Arleigh Burke class which can be problematic, or a brand new Zumwalt class which doesn't make sense.
I also don't believe the force will abandon Genesis for foreign Aegis. Doesn't make sense to me. What we need is the integration of SM2s and SM3s to Genesis combat management system.
Officially? noneWhat type of AAW systems we are officially wanting for TF-2000 ???
Officially? none
But we'll need SM2s and SM3s that's for sure.
I don't think Turkey will integrate Aegis CMS on TF-2000. What we need was an effective missile system to be integrated on ships, Otherwise, Integration of Aegis system on them cause the dead of Turkish Genesis+CAFRAD projects...
As It is stated that Turkey will try to obtain SM-2/3 missile systems to integrate our own combat management system. If USA doesn't give permission, The alternative solutions will be on schedule.
My scenarios;
TF-2000 hull+ Aselsan CAFRAD APAR radar+Havelsan Genesis CMS+SM-2/3
or
TF-2000 hull+Aselsan CAFRAD APAR radar+Havelsan Genesis CMS+Aster30
or (After normalization of relations between Israel-Turkey)
TF-2000 hull+Aselsan CAFRAD APAR radar+Havelsan Genesis CMS+Barak-8
Well, no, because this has no bearing on LCS. LCF and MILGEM are vastly different. LCS-2 class is entirely different design. LCS-1 Freedom class is substantially larger. The Chinese ship is a light frigate, with similar armament to enhanced MILGEM i.e. a direct competitor.