Turkish M60T tank vs Kornet anti-tank missile at Turkey's Bashiqah base in Iraq

[zzzz]

Difference between 1300 mm and 1200 mm is is just 8%. Thats statistical variation for any penetration.

You mean that is the difference between 100% penetration rate and 0% penetration rate, moron?

 

[500]

4 inches is a big difference. I have sources on my side you have nothing but opinions which is worth less then toilet paper. The manufacturer of the Kornet gives 2 differnt figures for two variants of the Kornet.

The penetration figures are averaged out, there is obviously a standard deviation. With your logic I can take any figures for Israeli weapons and simply do what you do---deny the authenticity. Pathetic.

1) What matters is percent, not actual number. For example our Sun each second loses 5 million tons of its mass. Huge number no? But percent wise its nothing.

2) "Pathetic" and funny that you are telling that 1300 mm penetration is much better than 1200 mm. And in same time u are telling that RPG-29 with 600 mm penetration was more effective than 1200-1300 mm

The Indian Mig-29 that an Indian member mentioned had some wester avionics, Russia did not provide that

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mikoyan_MiG-29


Initial production version; entered service in 1983. NATO reporting name is "Fulcrum-A". 9.12A is the downgraded export version for Warsaw Pact while the 9.12B is the downgraded export version for non-Warsaw Pact nations. It lacks a nuclear weapon delivery system and has initial production radar, ECM and IFF (no ECM and IFF in 9.12B).


Quick, start calling the source a lie. As to for the SU-30SM being inferior to the MKI.....prove it. Most avionics on the MKI are Russian, the ones that are not such as navigation, HUD and targeting pod do next to nothing in helping the MKI win in air-to-air.

Your wiki article does not give any sources to this claim. 9.12 did not have any ECM, they appeared only on 9.13. Russian avionics is inferior to Western, Russia still cant produce a normal targeting pod for example. Not talking that Russia was buying also Su-30M2 which is way inferior to Su-30MKI which India bought years before that.

Of course a reputable guy, which is one of the authorities on Soviet and Russian tanks decides to make a "hoax" and he personally tells you

I did not say he told me. It was open discussion on forum. He told that to Andrei Tarasenko actually. Web page u quoted was not updated for over a decade and contains some outdated data.

Everybody is just a liar except you, the next two sources, one a 184 page academic article and an Israeli Lieutenant colonel are lying when they say a MK4 was destroyed by a cornet, right?

Out of commission and destroyed are two very different things. All except 1 were returned to service.