What's new

Turkic World Photos/News/Discussions.

Was this the first mass conversion of Turks to Islam ?

In 893, Ismail took the city of Talas, the capital of the Karluk Turks, taking large numbers of slaves and livestock. In addition, a Nestorian church was converted into a mosque.[10] He also brought an end to the Principality of Ushrusana, extendingSamanid control over the Syr Darya river.[11] Ismail and other Samanid rulers propagated Islam amongst the inhabitants and as many as 30,000 tents of Turks came to profess Islam. During his reign he subjugated numerous regional states to the east, directly incorporating some within his boundaries and retaining the local rulers of others as vassals. Khwarezm to the north was partitioned; the southern part remained autonomous under its Afrighid rulers, while the northern part was governed by a Samanid official. Another campaign in 903 further secured the Samanid boundaries. These campaigns kept the heart of his state safe from Turkish raids, and allowed Muslim missionaries to expand their activities in the region.

Isma'il ibn Ahmad - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

  1. The Samanids, R.N. Frye, The Cambridge History of Iran, Vol.4, ed. R. N. Frye, (Cambridge University Press, 1999), 138.
 
Was this the first mass conversion of Turks to Islam ?

In 893, Ismail took the city of Talas, the capital of the Karluk Turks, taking large numbers of slaves and livestock. In addition, a Nestorian church was converted into a mosque.[10] He also brought an end to the Principality of Ushrusana, extendingSamanid control over the Syr Darya river.[11] Ismail and other Samanid rulers propagated Islam amongst the inhabitants and as many as 30,000 tents of Turks came to profess Islam. During his reign he subjugated numerous regional states to the east, directly incorporating some within his boundaries and retaining the local rulers of others as vassals. Khwarezm to the north was partitioned; the southern part remained autonomous under its Afrighid rulers, while the northern part was governed by a Samanid official. Another campaign in 903 further secured the Samanid boundaries. These campaigns kept the heart of his state safe from Turkish raids, and allowed Muslim missionaries to expand their activities in the region.

Isma'il ibn Ahmad - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

  1. The Samanids, R.N. Frye, The Cambridge History of Iran, Vol.4, ed. R. N. Frye, (Cambridge University Press, 1999), 138.
that part is unknown for me too i meet with a turk in internet he told me the mass conversion of turks was bloody btw i think turks enter middle east in far earlier time

@Targon

do u remember we talk about turkmen tribes ?? check ur book agian can u find kor tribe ? if yes does they really decedent of koroghul ?
 
that part is unknown for me too i meet with a turk in internet he told me the mass conversion of turks was bloody btw i think turks enter middle east in far earlier time

@Targon

do u remember we talk about turkmen tribes ?? check ur book agian can u find kor tribe ? if yes does they really decedent of koroghul ?

I don't know if Turks also served as slave soliders in the Umayyad Caliphate but the first Turks who were taken to the Middle East were treated as slaves and servants until they got a higher status

What I know is that they were brought by the Samanids as slaves to the Abbasid caliphate


Ghilman (singular Arabic: غُلاَم‎ ghulām ,[note 1] plural غِلْمَان ghilmān )[note 2] describes either young servants in paradise or slave-soldiers in the Abbasid, Ottoman, and Persian Safavid, Afsharid, and Qajar Empires. To a lesser extent, they played a role too in the Mughal Empire.


The ghilman were introduced to the Abbasid Caliphate during the reign of al-Mu'tasim (r. 833–842), who showed them great favor and relied upon them for his personal guard. The ghilman were slave-soldiers taken as prisoners of war from conquered regions or frontier zones, especially from among the Turkic people of Central Asia and the Caucasian peoples. They were opposed by the native Arab population, and riots against the ghilman in Baghdad in 836 forced Mu'tasim to relocate his capital to Samarra. The ghilman rose rapidly in power and influence, and under the weak rulers that followed Mu'tasim, they became king-makers: they revolted several times during the 860s and killed four caliphs. Since the break-up of the Abbasid Caliphate, the ghilman were grouped into whole armies. They were usually Turkic in origin and fought ascavalrymen.

A Ghulam was trained and educated at his master's expense and could earn his freedom through his dedicated service. Ghilman were required to marry Turkic slave-women, who were chosen for them by their masters.[1] Some ghilman seem to have lived celibate lives. The absence of family life and offspring was possibly one of the reasons why ghilman, even when attaining power, generally failed to start dynasties or proclaim their independence. The only exception to this was theGhaznavid dynasty of Afghanistan.

Ghilman - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Abū Isḥāq Muḥammad ibn Hārūn al-Ras̲h̲īd (Arabic: أبو إسحاق عباس بن هارون الرشيد‎; 795 – 5 January 842), better known by his regnal name al-Muʿtaṣim Bi’llāh (المعتصم بالله, "he who seeks refuge in God") was the eighth Abbasidcaliph, ruling from 833 to his death in 842.[1] A son of Harun al-Rashid, he succeeded his half-brother al-Ma'mun, under whom he served as a military commander and governor. His reign was marked by the introduction of theTurkish slave-soldiers (ghilman or mamalik) and the establishment for them of a new capital at Samarra. This was a watershed in the Caliphate's history, as the Turks would soon come to dominate the Abbasid government.[1][2]Domestically, Mu'tasim continued Ma'mun's support of Mu'tazilism and its inquisition (mihna). Mu'tasim is also notable as a warrior caliph, waging almost continuous wars, both against the Byzantine Empire, where he personally led the celebrated Sack of Amorium, as well as against various internal rebels, most notably achieving the final suppression of theKhurramite rebellion.[1][2]

Abu Ishaq was born to the Caliph Harun al-Rashid (ruled 786–809) and Marida, a Turkic slave concubine.[1] As one of Harun's younger sons, he was initially of little consequence.[3] During the civil war between his elder half-brothers al-Amin (r. 809–813) and al-Ma'mun (r. 813–833) he remained in Baghdad, and, like most members of the Abbasid dynasty and the Abbasid aristocracy (abnaʾ al-dawla), supported the anti-caliph Ibrahim ibn al-Mahdi in 817–819.[4] Muhammad ibn Jarir al-Tabarirecords that Abu Ishaq led the pilgrimage in 816, accompanied by many troops and officials, among whom was Hamdaway ibn Ali ibn Isa ibn Maham, who had just been appointed to the governorship of the Yemen and was on his way there. During his stay in Mecca, his troops defeated and captured a pro-Alid leader who raided the pilgrim caravans.[5] He also led the pilgrimage in the next year, but no details are known.[6]



From ca. 814/5, Abu Ishaq he began forming his famous corps of Turkish troops (collectively called "Turks", atrak, in the sources). The first were domestic slaves he bought in Baghdad (the distinguished general Itakh was originally a cook) whom he trained in the art of war, but they were soon complemented by Turkish slaves sent directly from Central Asia after an agreement with the local Samanid rulers. This private force was small—it probably numbered between three and four thousand at the time of his accession—but it was highly trained and disciplined, and turned Abu Ishaq into a power factor in his own right, as al-Ma'mun increasingly turned to him for assistance.[7][8] Abu Ishaq's Turkish corps was also politically useful to al-Ma'mun, who aimed to lessen his own dependence from the mostly eastern Iranian leaders who had supported him in the civil war, and who now occupied the senior positions in the new regime. In an effort to counterbalance their influence, al-Ma'mun granted formal recognition to his brother and his Turkish corps, as well as placing the Arab tribal levies of the Mashriq in the hands of his own son, al-Abbas.[9] The nature and identity of al-Mu'tasim's "Turkish slave soldiers" is a controversial subject, with both the ethnic label and the slave status of its members disputed. Although the bulk of the corps were clearly of servile origin, being either captured in war or purchased as slaves, in the sources they are never referred to as slaves (mamluk or ʿabid), but rather as mawali ("clients" or "freedmen") or ghilman ("pages"), implying that they were manumitted, a view reinforced by the fact that they were paid cash salaries.[10] In addition, prominent early members of the corps were neither Turks nor slaves, but rather Iranian princes from Central Asia like Afshin, prince ofUsrushana, who were followed by their personal retinues (chakars).[11][12]

I think this period was the the beginning of Turks who entered the Islamic world


al-Mu'tasim - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
Last edited:
Some genetic news about Turkic woman

Ancient DNA of 15 Sarmatian remains from Pokrovka kurgan burials in the southern Ural steppes along the Kazakhstan and Russian border was extracted for comparative analysis. Most of the mitochondrial haplogroups determined were of westernEurasian origin, while a few were of central/east Asian haplotype (Pr6) which is found among the Turkic speaking nomadic people, with a geographical extension from Kazakhstan to China. This haplotype[29] is almost (one base pair missing) identical with the haplotype of the 9-year-old (Kazakh)[30][31] girl from western Mongolia. A revelation of the study is the surprising presence of a Turkic-rooted woman among the Pokrovka Sarmatians, and the complete absence of any pointers characteristic for the Indo-Iranians, who reputedly constituted a bulk, if not all, of the Sarmatians.[32][33]

This so interesting!
 
What does the term Turco-Mongol mean? Turks and also many other are totally confused about this term. Here is the explanation of "Turco-Mongol":

Turko-Mongol (or Turkic-Mongol) can be a modern designation for various nomads who were subjects of the Mongol Empire. Being progressively Turkified (see Turkic peoples) in terms of language and identity following the Mongol conquests, they derived their ethnic and cultural origins from steppes of Central Asia. Among the most important Turco-Mongol kingdoms were the Chagatai Khanate and Golden Horde. The term is sometimes also used to describe successor Khanates and principalities, such as the Khanate of Kazan, theNogai Khanate, the Crimean Khanate, the Empire of Timur and the Turco-Persian Mughal dynasty, who was of Turco-Mongol origin.

It can also be a collective term to describe the common Altaic origin of both the Turkic and Mongolic peoples which can be found in their common Altaic languages, culture and to a lesser degree ethnic and genetic origins.[1][2]

Turco-Mongol - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

But you should be carefully with the term "Altaic" as it's not proven if Turkic and Mongolic languages have really a common origin unlike Indo-European or Uralic languages.
 
Stavropol Turkmens

Kafkas Türkmenleri - Vikipedi

1395302_599626700074066_1379562693_n.jpg


Nogay Turks

Nogais - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia



Soyot Turks

Soyot - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


can any one tell me what is the name of tribes of those turkmens in russia ?
 
can any one tell me what is the name of tribes of those turkmens in russia ?

Russian sources say Iğdır, Çavdur and Saynaji. They mıgrated there from Mangishlak in the second half of 17. Century, fleeing from Hive khans. First, they settled in Astrakhan gubernia, from there moved to the regions of Kuma and Manich rivers.
 
Who were the Eurasian Avars?


The Avars /ˈævɑrz/ were a group of equestrian warrior nomads[1] of Altaic extraction[2]who established an empire spanning considerable areas of Central and Eastern Europe from the late 6th to the early 9th century.[3] They were ruled by a Khagan, who led a tight-knit entourage of professional nomad warriors. Although the name Avar first appeared in the mid-5th century, the Avars of Europe enter the historical scene in the mid-6th century AD,[4] having formed as a mixed band of warriors in the Pontic-Caspian steppe wishing to escape Göktürk rule. Their linguistic affiliation may be tentatively deduced from a variety of sources, betraying a variety of languages spoken by ruling and subject clans. Oghur, a distinct branch of the Turkic languages, figures prominently for the original Avar language.[5] In any event, Slavic ultimately became thelingua franca in the Avar Khaganate.[6]

The earliest clear reference to the Avar ethnonym comes from Priscus the Rhetor who accounts that, c. 463, the Saraghurs,Onoghurs and Ughors were attacked by the Sabirs, who had been attacked by the Avars. In turn, the Avars had been driven off by people fleeing “man-eating griffins” coming from “the ocean” (Priscus Fr 40).[7] Whilst Priscus’ accounts provides some information about the ethno-political situation in the Don-Kuban-Volga region after the demise of the Huns, no unequivocal conclusions can be reached. In fact, Denis Sinor has argued that whoever the “Avars” referred to by Priscus were, they were different from the Avars who appear a century later, during Justinian’s reign.[8]

The next late antique author to discuss the Avars was Menander Protector, who details Gokturk embassies in Constantinoplein 565 and 568 CE. Each time, the Turks appear angered at the Byzantines for having made an alliance with the Avars, whom the Turks saw as their subjects and slaves. Turxanthos, a Turk prince, calls the Avars “Varchonites” and “escaped slaves of the Turks”, who numbered “about 20 thousand” (Menander Fr 43).[9]

Much greater, but somewhat confusing, details are provided by Theophylact Simocatta, who wrote c. 629, but detailed the final two decades of the 6th century. In particular, he (claims to) quote a triumph letter from Turk Khan Tardan:



According to the interpretation of Dobrovits and Nechaeva, the Turks insisted that the Avars are only pseudo-Avars, so as to boast that they were the only formidable power in the Eurasian steppe. The Gokturks claimed that the "real Avars" remained loyal subjects of the Turks, farther east.[8][10]

Furthermore, Dobrovits has questioned the authenticity of Theophylact's account. As such, they have argued that Theophylact borrowed information from Menander’s accounts of Byzantine-Turk negotiations to meet political needs of his time – i.e. to castigate and deride the Avars during a time of strained political relations between the Byzantines and Avars (coinciding with Emperor Maurice's north Balkan campaigns). By calling the Avars "Turkish slaves" and "pseudo-Avars", Theophylact undermined their political legitimacy.[8]


The French historian Deguignes postulated a link between the Avars of European history with the Juan-Juan of Inner Asia based on a coincidence between Tardan Khan’s letter to Constantinople and events recorded in Chinese sources, notably theWei-shi and Pei-shi.[11]

The Chinese sources state that T’u-men (=Bumin) khan, founder of Turkic dynasty and son of the legendary Ashina, defeated the Juan-Juan. Some of the Juan-Juan fled to the Chinese Western Wei. Later, according to another Chinese source, Mu-han khan, Bumin’s successor, defeated the "I-ta" (interpreted as Hephthalites) as well as theTieh-le, who were also known as Oghuz. Thus the events contained in the various Chinese sources, recording victories over the Tiehle, Juan-Juan and Ita (Hephthalites), seem to coincide with the narrative in the Turk envoy’s letter (in Theophylact above), boasting of Tardan’s victories over the Hephthalites, Avars and Oghurs. However, the two series of events are not synonymous. The events of the letter took place during Tardan’s rule, c. 580-599, whilst Chinese sources referring to the Turk defeat of the Juan-Juan and other inner Asian peoples occurred 50 years earlier, at founding of Turk khanate by Bumen.

Thus Harmatta rejects the association of Avars with Juan-Juan. Further hypotheses linking them with the Hephthalites are based on the Avars being called Varchonites by the Turks, i.e. being led by Var and Chunni factions. For, according to some Chinese transliterations, the term Var is rendered Hua, a term used by some Chinese sources when referring to the Hephthalites. This appeared to be supported by the name of a Hephthalite town, Varvaliz. However, this has rather been interpreted to mean "upper Fortress" in various Iranic languages.[11]



The Carpathian basin was the centre of the Avar power-base. The Avars re-settled captives from the peripheries of their empire to more central regions. Avar material culture is found south to Macedonia. However, to the east of the Carpathians, there are next to no Avar archaeological finds, suggesting that they lived mainly in the western Balkans. Scholars propose that a highly structured and hierarchical Avar society existed, having complex interactions with other "barbarian" groups. The khagan was the paramount figure, surrounded by a minority of nomadic aristocracy.

A few exceptionally rich burials have been uncovered, confirming that power was limited to the khagan and a close-knit class of "elite warriors". In addition to hoards of gold coins that accompanied the burials, the men were often buried with symbols of rank, such as decorated belts, weapons, stirrups resembling those found in central Asia, as well as their horse. The Avar army was composed from numerous other groups: Slavic, Gepidic and Bulgar military units. There also appeared to have existed semi-independent "client" (predominantly Slavic) tribes which served strategic roles, such as engaging in diversionary attacks and guarding the Avars' western borders abutting the Frankish Empire. Yet other tribes were equals and allies of the Avars, such as Khan Zabergan's Kutrigur Bulgars and Ardagastus' Slavs, which often conducted autonomous offensives into Byzantine land.

Initially, the Avars and their subjects lived separately, except for Slavic and Germanic women who married Avar men. Eventually, the Germanic and Slavic peoples were included in the Avaric social order and culture, itself Persian-Byzantine in fashion.[19] Scholars have identified a fused, Avar-Slavic culture, characterized by ornaments such as half-moon-shaped earrings, Byzantine-styled buckles, beads, and bracelets with horn-shaped ends.[19] Paul Fouracre notes, "[T]here appears in the seventh century a mixed Slavic-Avar material culture, interpreted as peaceful and harmonious relationships between Avar warriors and Slavic peasants. It is thought possible that at least some of the leaders of the Slavic tribes could have become part of the Avar aristocracy".[20] Apart from the assimilated Gepids, a few graves of west Germanic (Carolingian) peoples have been found in the Avar lands. They perhaps served as mercenaries.[19]

Language

Although there is sparse knowledge about the Avar language, scholars generally posit that the extinct language of the Eurasian Avars belonged to the Oghur branch,[5][21][22] of the Turkic language family. Today, Chuvash is thought to represent the last remaining branch of Oghuric. How well modern Chuvash represents archaic Oghuric remains speculative. Chuvash itself is not intelligible by speakers of other Turkic branches, despite having undergone significant degrees of Kipchakization in recent centuries.[23]

In contrast, it has also been suggested that the original language of the Avars was Tungusic[24][25][26] or Iranian.[27]

Whatever the original Avar language was, Slavic eventually became the dominant language of the Avar Khaganate.[6]


Eurasian Avars - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
The Cumans (Turkish: kuman / plural kumanlar[1] Hungarian: kun / plural kunok;[2] Greek: Κο(υ)μάνοι, Ko(u)mánoi;[3] Latin: Pallidi, Comani, Cuni,[4]Romanian: cuman / plural cumani, Polish: Połowcy, Plauci (Kumanowie),Russian: Половцы, Polovtsy; Ukrainian: Половці, Polovtsi; Bulgarian: Кумани,Czech: Plavci, Georgian: ყივჩაყი, ყიფჩაღი, German: Falones, Phalagi, Valvi, Valewen, Valani) were a Turkic[2][5][6][7] nomadic people comprising the western branch of the Cuman-Kipchak confederation. After the Mongol invasion (1237), many sought asylum in Hungary[8] and, subsequently, Bulgaria. The Cumans had also settled in Hungary and Bulgaria before the Mongol invasion.[9][10][11]

Related to the Pecheneg,[12] they inhabited a shifting area north of the Black Sea and along the Volga River known asCumania, where the Cuman-Kipchaks meddled in the politics of the Caucasus and the Khwarezm Empire.[13] Many eventually settled to the west of the Black Sea, influencing the politics of Kievan Rus', the Galicia–Volhynia Principality, theGolden Horde Khanate, the Second Bulgarian Empire, Serbia, the Kingdom of Hungary, Moldavia, the Kingdom of Georgia,Abkhazia, the Byzantine Empire, the Empire of Nicaea, the Latin Empire and Wallachia.[11] The Cumans also had a pre-eminent role in the Fourth Crusade and in the creation of the Second Bulgarian Empire.[14][15] Cuman and Kipchak tribes joined politically to create the Cuman-Kipchak confederation.[15][16] The Cuman language is attested in some medieval documents and is the best-known of the early Turkic languages.[17] The Codex Cumanicus was a linguistic manual which was written to help Catholic missionaries communicate with the Cuman people.

The Cumans were fierce and formidable nomadic warriors of the Eurasian steppe who exerted an enduring impact on the medieval Balkans.[18][19] They were numerous, culturally sophisticated and militarily powerful.[20] The basic instrument of Cuman political success was military force, which dominated each of the warring Balkan factions. Groups of the Cumans settled and mingled with the local population in regions of the Balkans. Those Cumans that settled in the Balkans were the founders of three successive Bulgarian dynasties (Asenids, Terterids, and Shishmanids) and the Wallachian dynasty (Basarabids).[21][22][23][24][25] But in the cases of the Basarab and Asenid dynasties, medieval documents refer to them asVlach (Romanian) dynasties.[26][27] They played an active role in the Byzantine Empire, the Kingdom of Hungary, the Second Bulgarian Empire and Serbia, with Cuman immigrants being integrated into each country's elite.





The Cumans' name in Russian and German means "yellow", in reference to the color of the Cumans' hair.[28] The Ukrainian word Polovtsy (Пóловці) means "blond" / "pale yellow", since the old Ukrainian word polovo means "straw". Kuman(quba/quw) means "pale yellow" / "yellowish grey" / "pale/sallow, cream coloured" in Turkic.[29][30] Some authors put forward the idea that the name Polovtsy referred to "men of the field, or of the steppe" (from the Ukrainian word pole: open ground, field), not to be confused with polyane (cf. Greek polis: city). In Slavic languages the word 'polyane' literally means "open ground, field". According to O. Suleymenov polovtsy came from a word for "blue-eyed", since the Serbo-Croatian word plavmeans "blue":[31] the Eastern Slavic equivalent would take the regular form *polov. A west Russian chronograph mentions the Cumans being called Половцы (Polovtsy) and Кум (Kum).[32] The western Cumans/Polovtsy were also calledSorochinetses by the Rus, this word deriving from sary chechle which means yellow haired in Turkic; the word was also evident in the Sary people, who went ahead of or were pushed by the Qun.[33]

It is difficult to know whether the etymology was actually referring to Cumans or mostly Kipchaks as both tribes had fused together and lived side by side.[34] The Cumans were called Folban, Vallani/Valwe by Germans.[17] In the German account by Adam of Bremen, and Matthaios of Edessa, the Cumans were referred to as the “Blond Ones”.[35] They were called Kun(Qoun)/Kunok by the Hungarians, and Polovtsy/Polovec (from Old East Slavic "половъ" — yellow) by the Russians — all meaning "blond".[36] The word Kipchak is derived from the Iranian kip for red/blone and cak/chak meaning Scyth.[37] It is difficult to know which group historians were referring to when they used the name Kipchak, as they could refer to the Cumans only, the Kipchaks only, or to both together. The two nations joined and lived together (and possibly exchanged weaponry, culture and fused languages), with the Cumans encompassing the western half of the confederation, while the Kipchaks and (assumably) the Kangli/Kankalis (a ruling clan of the Pechenegs) encompassing the eastern half.[34] This confederation and their living together may have made it difficult for historians to write exclusively about either nation.


Origins

Asia, circa 1200
The ethnic origins of the Cumanians are uncertain.[23][40][41] The Cumans were reported to have blond hair, fair skin and blue eyes (which set them apart from other groups and later puzzled historians),[36][42][43] although their anthropological characteristics suggests that their geographical origin might be in Inner-Asia, South-Siberia, or as Istvan Vassary postulates, east of the large bend of the Yellow River in China.[9][44][45][46] Robert Wolff states that it is conjectured that ethnically the Cumans may not originally have been Turkic.[47]The Roman natural philosopher, Pliny (who lived in the first century A.D), in describing the "Gates of Caucasus" (Derbent), mentions "a fortress, the name of which is Cumania, erected for the purpose of preventing the passage of the innumerable tribes that lay beyond."[48] The writings of al Marwazi (c. 1120) state that the 'Qun' people (as the Cumans were called in Hungary) came from the northern Chinese borders - "the land of Qitay" (possibly during a part of a migration from further east). After leaving the lands of theKhitans (possibly due to Kitai expansion [47]), they entered the territory of the Shari/Sari people. Marwazi wrote that the Qun were Nestorian Christians.[49] It cannot be concluded whether the Cumans conquered the Kipchaks or simply represent the western mass of largely Kipchak-Turkic speaking tribes. A "victim" of the Cuman migration to the west was the Kimek Khanate, which dissolved but then regrouped again under Kipchak-Cuman leadership. Due to this, Kimek tribal elements were represented amongst the Cuman-Kipchaks. The Qun are also mentioned by the Syrian historian Yaqut in The Dictionary of Countries, where he mentions "(The sixth iqlim) begins where the meridian shadow of the equinox is seven, six-tenths, and one-sixth of one-tenth of a foot. Its end exceeds its beginning by only one foot. It begins in the homeland of the Qani, Qun, Khirkhiz, Kimak, at-Tagazgaz, the lands of the Turkomans, Fārāb, and the country of the Khazars."[50][51] The Armenian historian, Matthew of Edessa, also mentioned the Cumans, by the name χartešk (khartes, meaning blond/pale/fair).[52][53] The Cumans entered the grasslands of the southern Russian steppe in the 11th century and continued to assault the Byzantine Empire, the Kingdom of Hungary, the Principality of Pereyaslavl and Kievan Rus'. The Cumans entry into the area pressed the Oghuz Turks to shift west which in turn caused the Pechenegs to move to the right of the Dnieper River.[17] Cuman and Rus attacks contributed to the Oghuz to depart from the steppes north of the Black Sea.[17] The Cumans first enter the Bugeac (Bessarabia) at some point around 1068-1078. The Cumans launched a joint expedition with the Pechenegs against Adrianople in 1078. During that same year the Cumans were also fighting the Rus'.[17] The RussianPrimary Chronicle mentions Yemek Cumans who were active in the region of Volga Bulgaria.[11][23]

The vast territory of the Cuman-Kipchak realm consisted of loosely connected tribal units who were the dominant military force but were never politically united by a strong central power; the khans acted on their own initiative. The Cuman-Kipchaks never established a state, instead forming a Cuman-Kipchak confederation (Cumania/Desht-i Qipchaq/Zemlja Poloveckaja(Polovcian Land)/Pole Poloveckoe(Polovcian Plain),[54] which stretched from the Danube in the west to Taraz,Kazakhstan in the east.[55] This was possibly due to them facing no prolonged threat before the Mongol invasion, and it may have either prolonged their existence or quickened their destruction.[56] Robert Wolff states that it was through discipline and cohesion that permitted the Cuman-Kipchaks to conquer such a vast territory.[57] al-Idrīsī states that Cumania got its name from the city of Cumania; he wrote "From the city of Khazaria to the city of Kirait is 25 miles. From there to Cumanie, which has given its name to the Cumans, it is 25 miles; this city is called Black Cumania. From the city of Black Cumania to the city of Tmutorakan (MaTlUqa), which is called White Cumania, it is 50 miles. White Cumania is a large inhabited city...Indeed, in this fifth part of the seventh section there is the northern part of the land of Russia and the northern part of the land of Cumania...In this sixth part there is a description of the land of Inner Cumania and parts of the land of Bulgaria."[58] TheGolden Horde Khanate was also referred to as "Comania" by Armenian chronicler Hethum (Hayton) of Korykos.[59] The Moroccan traveler, Ibn Batutta, said of Cumania, "This wilderness is green and grassy with no trees, nor hills, high or low...there is no means of travelling in this desert except in wagons." The Persian historian, Hamdallah Mustawfi, wrote that Cumania has a cold climate and that it has excellent pasturage and numerous cattle and horses.[60] The traveler, John Mandeville, wrote that Cumania "is one of the great kingdoms in the world, but it is not all inhabited. For at one of the parts there is so great cold that no man may dwell there; and in another part there is so great heat that no man may endure it...And the principal city of Comania is clept Sarak [Serai], that is one of the three ways for to go into India. But by that way, he may not pass no great multitude of people, but if it be in winter. And that passage men clepe the Derbend. The other way is for to go from the city of Turkestan by Persia, and by that way be many journeys by desert. And the third way is that cometh from Comania and then to go by the Great Sea and by the kingdom of Abchaz...After that, the Comanians that were in servage in Egypt, felt themselves that they were of great power, they chose them a soldan amongst them, the which made him to be clept Melechsalan. And in his time entered into the country of the kings of France Saint Louis, and fought with him; and [the soldan] took him and imprisoned him; and this [soldan] was slain by his own servants. And after, they chose another to be soldan, that they clept Tympieman; and he let deliver Saint Louis out of prison for a certain ransom. And after, one of these Comanians reigned, that hight Cachas, and slew Tympieman, for to be soldan; and made him be clept Melechmenes."[61]According to the 12th-century Jewish traveler Petachiah of Regensburg “they have no king, only princes and royal families.”[56] Cumans interacted with the Rus' principalities, Bulgaria, Byzantine Empire, and the Wallachian states in the Balkans; withArmenia and Kingdom of Georgia (see Kipchaks in Georgia) in the Caucasus; and with the Khwarezm Empire in Central Asia. The Cumans-Kipchaks constituted an important element and were closely associated with the Khwarazmian royal house, via marital alliances.[62] The Cumans were also active in commerce with traders from Central Asia to Venice.[63] The Cumans had a commercial interest in Crimea where they also took tribute from Crimean cities. A major area of commerce was the ancient city of Sudak, which was viewed by Ibn al-Air as the "city of the Qifjaq from which (flow) their material possessions. It is on the Khazar Sea. Ships come to it bearing clothes. The Qifjiqs buy from them and sell them slaves. Burtas furs, beaver, squirrels..." Due to their political dominance, the Cuman language became the lingua franca of the region. Thus the language was adopted by the Karaite Jewish and Crimean Armenian communities (who produced many documents written in Kipchak with the Armenian alphabet [64]), where it was preserved for centuries up to the modern day.[62]

The Cuman-Kipchaks created a powerful caste of warriors, the Mamluks and the Mamluk Sultanate (Cairo). These Mamluks came from Crimea and were from the Cuman clans of Burchevichi (Mamluk:Burch-oghlu), a part of which also settled in Hungary and mentioned as the Borchol; Itoba and Toksobichi (Mamluk:Toqsoba).[65] These three clans were mentioned by Rus' sources, the former two appearing to be part of the "Non Wild" Cumans.[55] The Mamluks were seen as "true lords", with social status above freeborn Egyptian Muslims.[66] The Cuman-Kipchak Qutub-ud-din Aibak was appointed as governor of a part of the realm of Muhammad Ghori. Qutub proclaimed independence after the death of his patron and created theDelhi Sultanate;[67] his line is known as the Mamluk Dynasty due to his origin.[68] The most prominent Cuman Sultan of the Mamluk Sultanate was Sultan Baibars, who defeated King Louis IX of France and resisted the Mongol invasion, defeating them at the Battle of Ain Jalut and the Battle of Elbistan (by using the feigned retreat tactic); he is considered as one of the greatest medieval Muslim leaders.[69][70] Mamluks in the empire retained a particularly strong sense of Cuman identity, to the degree that the biography of Sultan Baibars, as reflected by Ibn Shaddad, focused on his birth and early years in Desht-i-Kipchak (“Steppe of the Kipchaks”/Cumania), as well as enslavement and subsequent travels to Bulgaria and the Near East. The historian Dimitri Korobeinikov relates how Baibars’ story sums up the tragic fate of many Cumans after the Battle of Kalka River and the Mongol invasion of Europe. Roman Kovalev states that this story can further be seen as a mechanism for the preservation of a collective memory broadly reflecting a sense of Cuman identity in the Mamluk Sultanate.[71] In the latter part of the 1260s the Mamluks were allied with the Golden Horde against the Ilkhnate.[72] The creation of this specific warrior class was described as the "mamluk phenomenon" by David Ayalon and was of great political importance.[73]

Cumans - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
does any ethical group remain of them ?

No the Cuman language is extinct but modern Kipchak languages are lingusitically related to the Cuman language

Cuman (Kuman) was a Kipchak Turkic language spoken by the Cumans(Polovtsy, Folban, Vallany, Kun) (western Kypchaks). The Kipchak language/Cuman is documented in medieval works, including the Codex Cumanicus, and it was a literary language in the Central and Eastern Europe that left a rich literary inheritance. The language became the main language (lingua franca) of the Golden Horde.[1]

The Cuman-Kipchaks were nomadic people that lived in the steppes of Eastern Europe, north of Black Sea before the Golden Horde. The languages that descended from ancient Cuman are Crimean Tatar, Karachay, Balkar andKumyk.

They later had an important role in the history of Hungary, Rumania (see, for example, the Besarab dynasty), Moldavia and Bessarabia.

The Cuman language became extinct in early 17th century in the region of Cumania in Hungary, which was its last stronghold.

From the book known as the Codex Cumanicus, A Kipchak-Cuman Turkic prayer:

Atamız kim köktesiñ. Alğışlı bolsun seniñ atıñ, kelsin seniñ xanlığıñ, bolsun seniñ tilemekiñ – neçikkim kökte, alay [da] yerde. Kündeki ötmegimizni bizge bugün bergil. Dağı yazuqlarımıznı bizge boşatqıl – neçik biz boşatırbiz bizge yaman etkenlerge. Dağı yekniñ sınamaqına bizni quurmağıl. Basa barça yamandan bizni qutxarğıl. Amen!

In Oghuz Turkish (Turkey), the same text is:

Atamız sen göktesin. Alkışlı olsun senin adın, gelsin senin hanlığın, olsun senin dilemeğin – nice ki gökte, öyle (de) yerde. Gündelik ekmeğimizi bize bugün ver. Dahi yazıklarımızdan (suçlarımızdan) bizi bağışla – nice biz bağışlarız bize yaman (kötülük) edenleri. Dahi şeytanın (yekin) sınamasından bizi koru. Tüm yamandan (kötülükten) bizi kurtar. Amin!

Tradition holds that the last speaker of the Cuman language in Hungary was a certain István Varró, a resident of Karcag (Hungary) who died in 1770.
 
does any ethical group remain of them ?

Isn't it strange that Turkic peoples like Cumans, Avars, Bulgars and Pechenegs who embraced Christianity got assimilated by the Magyars, Slavs and Romanians while Turkic peoples who embraced Islam still speak the language of their forefathers?

Avars embraced Christianity- got assimilated by Slavs
Cumans embraced Christianity- got assimilated by Magyars and Romanians
Bulgars embraced Christianity- got assimilated by South Slavs

Chuvashs- Yes they are classified as Turkic people but seriously I understand Persian and Arabic better than Chuvash which sounds just as foreign to me like Chinese. They are the most numerous Christian Turkic people with 1,6 Million native speakers

Gagauz- They number only 200.000 people or something like that. They are also Christians
 
Last edited:
Isn't it strange that Turkic peoples like Cumans, Avars, Bulgars and Pechenegs who embraced Christianity got assimilated by the Magyars, Slavs and Romanians while Turkic peoples who embraced Islam still speak the language of their forefathers?

Avars embraced Christianity- got assimilated by Slavs
Cumans embraced Christianity- got assimilated by Magyars and Romanians

Chuvashs- Yes they are classified as Turkic people but seriously I understand Persian and Arabic better than Chuvash which sounds just as foreign to me like Chinese. They are the most numerous Christian Turkic people with 1,6 Million native speakers

Gagauz- They number only 200.000 people or something like that. They are also Christians
Dont forget the Karaim Turks.
 
Back
Top Bottom