What's new

Turkey is no American Ally

Y U Turks dont wanna fight against jihadists, you are antisemites. :cray:

Israel is just as next door to Syria as Turkey is, i dont understand why everybody is demanding from us to intervene as if we was responsible for levant, whats more hilarious is that if we would intervene you would hear people saying New Ottomans coming, ME truly sucks. :hitwall:
 
.
Annnnddd the new year opens with a record ratio of Jew-baiting to on-topic posts! Proof that Erdo has successfully employed antisemitism as a blinder and displacement for Turks who are getting screwed by the AKP, yes?

There is no such thing as "antisemitism". It is not real. Anti-semitism.. What does the word "semitism" mean in the first place?

It is just a recently made-up word that is used to bash people who successfully point out the BS that Israel and zionists in general do.

Perhaps if Jews praised Erdogan for eliminating thieves from Turkey that would to the trick?

Where was the article criticized, rather than myself or its author? It's all 'ignore that barbarians are at the gate, just shoot the messenger' sort of thing, yes?

Well, that would actually really work.. If Netanyahu and other jewish religious peeps with their clothes and beards come to the scene and say things like "We are so proud of Erdogan", "Erdogan is a better jew than us", "We, as the heads of Israel/Jews, sincerely hope that Erdogan will always rule Turkey", "We wish Erdogan the best of luck in the elections and hope that he would beat all of his "kafir" opponents so badly!!", then he would actually really start losing elections.

In our country, poor man always wins, regardless of the situation. And it is also known that "a jew cannot be a "poor man"" xD
 
. .
Erdogan is anything but poor. :whistle:

The word "poor" was not meant to have the meaning of the opposite of the word "rich" in that sentence.

The word "poor" does not have only one meaning, just so you know..
 
.
I laughed seriously.

Well I believe for an unpolarized foreign policy. But we are not strong enough to sufficiently make that nor we have a good leader in charge who's busy with birth control issues and trolling with 16 yo kids that called him thief. So it's beneficial for us to stay inside the Western bloc, not being a puppet of it. Until we become strong enough of course. That's the reality.

Back to topic, Here's a part from the writer's biography;

Inbar’s area of specialization is Middle Eastern strategic issues with a special interest in the politics and strategy of Israeli national security. He has written over 80 articles in professional journals and edited volumes. He has authored five books: Outcast Countries in the World Community (1985), War and Peace in Israeli Politics. Labor Party Positions on National Security (1991), Rabin and Israel’s National Security (1999), The Israeli-Turkish Entente (2001), and Israel's National Security: Issues and Challenges since the Yom Kippur War (2008). He has also edited twelve collections of articles.

Prof. Inbar served in the Israel Defense Force (IDF) as a paratrooper. He was a member of the Political Strategic Committee of the National Planning Council and the Chair of the Committee for the National Security Curriculum at the Ministry of Education. He served on the Academic Committee of the History Department of the IDF and as the President of the Israel Association of International Studies. Prof. Inbar is widely quoted in the Israeli and international press.

Areas of Specialization and Teaching:
  • War and Strategy
  • National Security Problems in the Middle East
  • Israeli Politics
Source: Professor Efraim Inbar's Website


Here's the very known article written by him at Jerusalem Post:

Israel’s apology to Turkey was a mistake - Opinion - Jerusalem Post


And that's what he has become :lol::

Top professor: Bar-Ilan University 'only Zionist' institution in IsraelIsrael News - Haaretz Israeli News source
 
.
The word "poor" was not meant to have the meaning of the opposite of the word "rich" in that sentence.

The word "poor" does not have only one meaning, just so you know..
ubigl8.jpg
 
.
Response to article is in red

Turkey is no American Ally

by Efraim Inbar
BESA Center Perspectives
January 4, 2015


Originally published under the title, "America's Unacknowledged Problem."

692.jpg

Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan has gone increasingly rogue since the AKP's rise to power.

Turkey is officially a NATO ally, and President Barrack Obama has called the current President of Turkey, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, a friend. But Erdogan-led Turkey does not behave as an ally or a friend of the US. This is not a new development.

Erdogan and his Islamist party, the AKP, have ruled Turkey since 2002. Erdogan's Turkey has gradually distanced itself from the West, adopting domestic and foreign policies fueled by Ottoman and Islamist impulses.

Increased trade with America over the years: https://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/balance/c4890.html

See links:

Lockheed Martin announces Roketsan teaming on new F-35 standoff missile - IHS Jane's 360

Turkey F-35 Industrial Participation | F-35 Lightning II

Boeing hands over third Peace Eagle aircraft to Turkish Air Force - Airforce Technology

Turkey, P&W sign F-35 engine LOI - IHS Jane's 360

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/16/w...radar-for-nato-defense-against-iran.html?_r=0

Turkey, U.S. to finalize Syrian rebel training this month: official| Reuters


http://www.nato.int/cps/ic/natohq/news_114783.htm



Turkey has been on the road to an authoritarian regime for several years. Infringements on human rights have gradually increased. In truth, Turkey has never had a political system with checks and balances able to constrain attempts to consolidate power around one politician. In recent years, Erdogan has weakened further the few constitutional constraints against the 'Putinization' of the Turkish political system.

Foci of power, such as the bureaucracy, the banking system, industrial associations and trade unions have been mostly coopted by the AKP.

The longer Erdogan rules, the more power hungry he seems. His authoritarian personality becomes clearer every day. The press is hardly free. Erdogan arrests even Islamist journalists that are critical of his policies. His party has infiltrated the judicial system and the police. Foci of power, such as the bureaucracy, the banking system, industrial associations and trade unions have been mostly coopted by the AKP. Opposition political parties are largely discredited. The military, once active in politics as the defender of the Kemalist secular tradition, has been successfully sidelined.

From a realpolitik perspective, the domestic political developments, deplorable as they may be in Turkey, could be ignored by the democratic West as long as Ankara continues to be a useful ally. Unfortunately, Turkey no longer qualifies as a trusted ally.

None of the above is related to U.S-Turkey relations. U.S does business with many non democratic countries and dictatorships so turkeys political atmosphere is irrelevant. Also the authors statement shows that he doesn't care about any benefits turkey gets from the u.s because he says "usefull ally", so basically dump Turkey in the trash if it isn't useful.

The most recent examples of nefarious Turkish behavior are its support of ISIS and Hamas. Turkey is playing a double game on the issue of the Islamic State. It pretends to cooperate with the US policy in the attempt to contain radical Islam, but actually Turkey supports ISIS. It allows volunteers passage through Turkish territory to join ISIS in Iraq. ISIS receives logistical support via Turkey, and sends its wounded militants for treatment there. Turkish military forces stood idly by the besieged city of Kobani, just across the Turkish border, while the Islamists killed Kurdish fighters. Finally, Turkey denies the American air force access to Turkish bases; forcing the US to use far away bases when attacking ISIS targets.

Evidence saying that Turkey is supporting isis is b.s. They say turkey lets them through etc. This is the same as saying that america supports Mexican drug cartels because they come across the u.s border. Yes turkey does treat wounded isis fighters but it also treats wounded pkk and pyd fighters. Also turkey has let the krg send troops to kobani via turkey. Turkey is willing to launch a military operation against isis only if it involves a comprehensive plan that has long term solutions. Bombing from the air and blowing up terrorists isn't a long term solution.

PKK and PYD are the samething so their is no logical reason for Turkey to support them. Thats like fighting the pakistani taliban and then supporting the afghan taliban.


Turkey is also openly supporting another radical Islamist organization – Hamas. Despite the fact that the West regards Hamas a terrorist organization, Ankara regularly hosts Hamas representatives that meet the highest Turkish dignitaries. Hamas, an offshoot of the Muslim Brotherhood, has a rabid anti-American position. Moreover, Salah al-Aruri, a senior Hamas operative, operates out of Istanbul. Recently, the Turkish branch of Hamas was involved in a series of attempts to carry out terrorist attacks against Israel, and in orchestrating a coup against the current leadership of the Palestinian Authority.

Yes turkey does support/sympathize with hamas.

Such behavior should not surprise policy makers in Washington. In 2003, Ankara denied the request from Washington to open its territory so that the US military could attack Saddam Hussein's forces from two separate fronts.

Turkey allowed u.n forces to use its bases against saddam after a u.n resolution in the 1990's

Iraq–Turkey relations - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Operation iraqi freedom had no u.n resolution and was not a nato operation thus turkey had no legal obligations to aid the u.s in anyway. Besides during the war in cyprus the u.s sanctioned Turkey :-)


AKP-ruled Ankara also defied American preferences on Syria, a country allied with radical Iran and on the American list of states supporting terrorism. In January 2004, Bashar Assad became the first Syrian president ever to visit Turkey. In April 2009, the two states conducted their first ever joint military exercise. No other NATO member had such close relations with the authoritarian regime in Damascus, which has been closely allied with Iran for several decades.

I guess the author expects turkey not to have traded with some of its eastern neighbors Iran and Syria. Those are two important markets for turkey. Imagine if the u.s couldn't trade with mexico.

Just because you are in NATO doesn't mean that you can't have military exercises with other countries that are perceived to be hostile by certain NATO countries and some non nato countries. The u.s held military exercises with the China and it has also held exercises with Russia so I dont see why Turkey isn't allowed to have exercises with Syria. Besides from what I remeber those were border security exercises.


Turkey further deviated from the Western consensus in 2008 by hosting Sudanese President Omar Hassan al-Bashir twice. Bashir, who was charged with war crimes and genocide in Darfur, presided over an Islamist regime.


If turkey is an independent country it should have the right to talk to however it wants and trade with who it wants as long as everything is within international law.

Turkey has consistently defied advice from Washington to tone down its anti-Israel statements and mend relations with an important American ally.

Turkey even welcomed the president of the Islamic Republic of Iran, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, for a visit in August 2008. No Western country has issued such an invitation to the Iranian leader. Additionally, Erdogan congratulated Ahmadinejad immediately after his re-election in June 2009. When it comes to Iran's nuclear threat, Ankara, unlike its NATO allies, has refused to adopt the U.S. stance on harsher sanctions, fearing in part the economic consequences of such steps. In June 2010, Turkey voted at the UN Security Council against a US-sponsored resolution meant to impose a new round of sanctions on Iran.

Again its a big market for Turkey and Turkey buys alot of its gas from iran. Not trading with Iran would be like the u,s not being able to trade with canada. Besides Iran has completely different objectives than Turkey so what the author is writing is laughable. Press TV is always doing propaganda against turkey and iran has threatened to attack nato bases in turkey if the u,s attacks iran.

Iran threatens to bomb Turkey if U.S. or Israel attack nuclear installations | Daily Mail Online

Iran threatens to hit Turkey if US, Israel attack - Israel News, Ynetnews

Turkey also has consistently defied advice from Washington to tone down its anti-Israel statements and mend relations with an important American ally. All American efforts in this direction have failed.

There is also a clear divergence between the US and Turkey on important global issues such as Russia and China. For example, the US. wanted to send ships into the Black Sea via the Bosphorus Straits during the Georgia war in August 2008. Turkey flatly denied several such requests on the pretext that the military vessels were too large. Moreover, Turkey proposed the creation of a regional security framework involving Turkey, Russia, Georgia, Armenia, and Azerbaijan, that left out a NATO role. More blatantly, Turkey has failed to participate in the Western economic sanctions imposed on Russia during the recent Ukraine crisis.

Russia supplies a large a amount of gas to turkey I think that explains alot.
I dont know which security frame work the author is talking about.


Dissonance exists also with regards to China. While the US fears the rise of China, Turkey sees this country as a potential economic partner and not as a problem. It held military exercises with China. Ankara even considered purchasing anti-aircraft systems from Beijing, an incredibly brazen position for a NATO member!

See links:

First U.S.-China-Australia Joint Military Drills Begin in Darwin - Bloomberg

China heads to joint naval exercises with U.S. - CBS News

http://sinosphere.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/11/12/israel-increasingly-courting-china-as-an-ally/?_r=0

China: Free Trade Agreement Talks with Israel - Global Agenda - News - Arutz Sheva


It is not clear why Washington puts up with such Turkish behavior. The Obama administration seems to be unable to call a spade a spade. It refuses to acknowledge that Turkey is a Trojan horse in NATO, and that Ankara undermines American interests in the Middle East and elsewhere.

Efraim Inbar, director of the Begin-Sadat Center for Strategic Studies, is a professor of political studies at Bar-Ilan University, and a Shillman/Ginsburg fellow at the Middle East Forum.
 
.
whats more hilarious is that if we would intervene you would hear people saying New Ottomans coming
vallahi billahi @xenon54 bro, this is exactly what i had in mind this morning. Great minds think alike :D

in the meantime Israel patches up wounded FSA fighters and allows them to cross back into Syria and you dont hear anyone about this, probably because out of fear of being labeled anti-semite if they do so..
 
.
Funny that the article does not mention even for once that the EU removed Hamas from their terrorist list.
 
.
Annnnddd the new year opens with a record ratio of Jew-baiting to on-topic posts! Proof that Erdo has successfully employed antisemitism as a blinder and displacement for Turks who are getting screwed by the AKP, yes?

lol
 
. .
Response to article is in red

Turkey is no American Ally

by Efraim Inbar
BESA Center Perspectives
January 4, 2015


Originally published under the title, "America's Unacknowledged Problem."

692.jpg

Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan has gone increasingly rogue since the AKP's rise to power.

Turkey is officially a NATO ally, and President Barrack Obama has called the current President of Turkey, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, a friend. But Erdogan-led Turkey does not behave as an ally or a friend of the US. This is not a new development.

Erdogan and his Islamist party, the AKP, have ruled Turkey since 2002. Erdogan's Turkey has gradually distanced itself from the West, adopting domestic and foreign policies fueled by Ottoman and Islamist impulses.

Increased trade with America over the years: https://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/balance/c4890.html

See links:

Lockheed Martin announces Roketsan teaming on new F-35 standoff missile - IHS Jane's 360

Turkey F-35 Industrial Participation | F-35 Lightning II

Boeing hands over third Peace Eagle aircraft to Turkish Air Force - Airforce Technology

Turkey, P&W sign F-35 engine LOI - IHS Jane's 360

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/16/w...radar-for-nato-defense-against-iran.html?_r=0

Turkey, U.S. to finalize Syrian rebel training this month: official| Reuters


http://www.nato.int/cps/ic/natohq/news_114783.htm



Turkey has been on the road to an authoritarian regime for several years. Infringements on human rights have gradually increased. In truth, Turkey has never had a political system with checks and balances able to constrain attempts to consolidate power around one politician. In recent years, Erdogan has weakened further the few constitutional constraints against the 'Putinization' of the Turkish political system.

Foci of power, such as the bureaucracy, the banking system, industrial associations and trade unions have been mostly coopted by the AKP.

The longer Erdogan rules, the more power hungry he seems. His authoritarian personality becomes clearer every day. The press is hardly free. Erdogan arrests even Islamist journalists that are critical of his policies. His party has infiltrated the judicial system and the police. Foci of power, such as the bureaucracy, the banking system, industrial associations and trade unions have been mostly coopted by the AKP. Opposition political parties are largely discredited. The military, once active in politics as the defender of the Kemalist secular tradition, has been successfully sidelined.

From a realpolitik perspective, the domestic political developments, deplorable as they may be in Turkey, could be ignored by the democratic West as long as Ankara continues to be a useful ally. Unfortunately, Turkey no longer qualifies as a trusted ally.

None of the above is related to U.S-Turkey relations. U.S does business with many non democratic countries and dictatorships so turkeys political atmosphere is irrelevant. Also the authors statement shows that he doesn't care about any benefits turkey gets from the u.s because he says "usefull ally", so basically dump Turkey in the trash if it isn't useful.

The most recent examples of nefarious Turkish behavior are its support of ISIS and Hamas. Turkey is playing a double game on the issue of the Islamic State. It pretends to cooperate with the US policy in the attempt to contain radical Islam, but actually Turkey supports ISIS. It allows volunteers passage through Turkish territory to join ISIS in Iraq. ISIS receives logistical support via Turkey, and sends its wounded militants for treatment there. Turkish military forces stood idly by the besieged city of Kobani, just across the Turkish border, while the Islamists killed Kurdish fighters. Finally, Turkey denies the American air force access to Turkish bases; forcing the US to use far away bases when attacking ISIS targets.

Evidence saying that Turkey is supporting isis is b.s. They say turkey lets them through etc. This is the same as saying that america supports Mexican drug cartels because they come across the u.s border. Yes turkey does treat wounded isis fighters but it also treats wounded pkk and pyd fighters. Also turkey has let the krg send troops to kobani via turkey. Turkey is willing to launch a military operation against isis only if it involves a comprehensive plan that has long term solutions. Bombing from the air and blowing up terrorists isn't a long term solution.

PKK and PYD are the samething so their is no logical reason for Turkey to support them. Thats like fighting the pakistani taliban and then supporting the afghan taliban.


Turkey is also openly supporting another radical Islamist organization – Hamas. Despite the fact that the West regards Hamas a terrorist organization, Ankara regularly hosts Hamas representatives that meet the highest Turkish dignitaries. Hamas, an offshoot of the Muslim Brotherhood, has a rabid anti-American position. Moreover, Salah al-Aruri, a senior Hamas operative, operates out of Istanbul. Recently, the Turkish branch of Hamas was involved in a series of attempts to carry out terrorist attacks against Israel, and in orchestrating a coup against the current leadership of the Palestinian Authority.

Yes turkey does support/sympathize with hamas.

Such behavior should not surprise policy makers in Washington. In 2003, Ankara denied the request from Washington to open its territory so that the US military could attack Saddam Hussein's forces from two separate fronts.

Turkey allowed u.n forces to use its bases against saddam after a u.n resolution in the 1990's

Iraq–Turkey relations - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Operation iraqi freedom had no u.n resolution and was not a nato operation thus turkey had no legal obligations to aid the u.s in anyway. Besides during the war in cyprus the u.s sanctioned Turkey :-)


AKP-ruled Ankara also defied American preferences on Syria, a country allied with radical Iran and on the American list of states supporting terrorism. In January 2004, Bashar Assad became the first Syrian president ever to visit Turkey. In April 2009, the two states conducted their first ever joint military exercise. No other NATO member had such close relations with the authoritarian regime in Damascus, which has been closely allied with Iran for several decades.

I guess the author expects turkey not to have traded with some of its eastern neighbors Iran and Syria. Those are two important markets for turkey. Imagine if the u.s couldn't trade with mexico.

Just because you are in NATO doesn't mean that you can't have military exercises with other countries that are perceived to be hostile by certain NATO countries and some non nato countries. The u.s held military exercises with the China and it has also held exercises with Russia so I dont see why Turkey isn't allowed to have exercises with Syria. Besides from what I remeber those were border security exercises.


Turkey further deviated from the Western consensus in 2008 by hosting Sudanese President Omar Hassan al-Bashir twice. Bashir, who was charged with war crimes and genocide in Darfur, presided over an Islamist regime.


If turkey is an independent country it should have the right to talk to however it wants and trade with who it wants as long as everything is within international law.

Turkey has consistently defied advice from Washington to tone down its anti-Israel statements and mend relations with an important American ally.

Turkey even welcomed the president of the Islamic Republic of Iran, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, for a visit in August 2008. No Western country has issued such an invitation to the Iranian leader. Additionally, Erdogan congratulated Ahmadinejad immediately after his re-election in June 2009. When it comes to Iran's nuclear threat, Ankara, unlike its NATO allies, has refused to adopt the U.S. stance on harsher sanctions, fearing in part the economic consequences of such steps. In June 2010, Turkey voted at the UN Security Council against a US-sponsored resolution meant to impose a new round of sanctions on Iran.

Again its a big market for Turkey and Turkey buys alot of its gas from iran. Not trading with Iran would be like the u,s not being able to trade with canada. Besides Iran has completely different objectives than Turkey so what the author is writing is laughable. Press TV is always doing propaganda against turkey and iran has threatened to attack nato bases in turkey if the u,s attacks iran.

Iran threatens to bomb Turkey if U.S. or Israel attack nuclear installations | Daily Mail Online

Iran threatens to hit Turkey if US, Israel attack - Israel News, Ynetnews

Turkey also has consistently defied advice from Washington to tone down its anti-Israel statements and mend relations with an important American ally. All American efforts in this direction have failed.

There is also a clear divergence between the US and Turkey on important global issues such as Russia and China. For example, the US. wanted to send ships into the Black Sea via the Bosphorus Straits during the Georgia war in August 2008. Turkey flatly denied several such requests on the pretext that the military vessels were too large. Moreover, Turkey proposed the creation of a regional security framework involving Turkey, Russia, Georgia, Armenia, and Azerbaijan, that left out a NATO role. More blatantly, Turkey has failed to participate in the Western economic sanctions imposed on Russia during the recent Ukraine crisis.

Russia supplies a large a amount of gas to turkey I think that explains alot.
I dont know which security frame work the author is talking about.


Dissonance exists also with regards to China. While the US fears the rise of China, Turkey sees this country as a potential economic partner and not as a problem. It held military exercises with China. Ankara even considered purchasing anti-aircraft systems from Beijing, an incredibly brazen position for a NATO member!

See links:

First U.S.-China-Australia Joint Military Drills Begin in Darwin - Bloomberg

China heads to joint naval exercises with U.S. - CBS News

http://sinosphere.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/11/12/israel-increasingly-courting-china-as-an-ally/?_r=0

China: Free Trade Agreement Talks with Israel - Global Agenda - News - Arutz Sheva


It is not clear why Washington puts up with such Turkish behavior. The Obama administration seems to be unable to call a spade a spade. It refuses to acknowledge that Turkey is a Trojan horse in NATO, and that Ankara undermines American interests in the Middle East and elsewhere.

Efraim Inbar, director of the Begin-Sadat Center for Strategic Studies, is a professor of political studies at Bar-Ilan University, and a Shillman/Ginsburg fellow at the Middle East Forum.
And it's Hakan who gets the high grade here for giving a substantial response, moreover one that actually rebuts the author's argument with, "Turkey, U.S. to finalize Syrian rebel training this month: official| Reuters". "A+" grade on the curve, slight downgrade for providing more material than needed and another downgrade for confusing trade relations with an actual alliance. Final grade: B+.
 
.
In 2014, Sikorsky announced a major 30-year co-production partnership for the Turkish Utility Helicopter Program, worth up to $8 billion over its life cycle. Boeing continues its strategic partnership with Turkish Airlines, which now flies to more countries than any airline in the world. Pratt and Whitney opened a new engine parts facility in Izmir that will supply the Joint Strike Fighter, in which Turkey has partnered. General Electric announced a $900 million investment in Turkey across several of its business lines. American firms are pursuing energy, aerospace, defense and health care projects throughout the country.
 
.
And it's Hakan who gets the high grade here for giving a substantial response, moreover one that actually rebuts the author's argument with, "Turkey, U.S. to finalize Syrian rebel training this month: official| Reuters". "A+" grade on the curve, slight downgrade for providing more material than needed and another downgrade for confusing trade relations with an actual alliance. Final grade: B+.
You should ask yourself why no one is taking such a junk of an article seriously before expecting serious comments from Turks. @Hakan actually took the time to rebuke it, but what does it change if such authors (coincidentally often, if not always unconditionally pro-Israel) regularly continue to keep shitting out such false, hypocrite and subjective news? After some time you will do nothing but ridicule and push such articles aside.
 
.
logo.png


Turkey is no American Ally
by Efraim Inbar
BESA Center Perspectives
January 4, 2015


Originally published under the title, "America's Unacknowledged Problem."

692.jpg

Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan has gone increasingly rogue since the AKP's rise to power.

Turkey is officially a NATO ally, and President Barrack Obama has called the current President of Turkey, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, a friend. But Erdogan-led Turkey does not behave as an ally or a friend of the US. This is not a new development.

Erdogan and his Islamist party, the AKP, have ruled Turkey since 2002. Erdogan's Turkey has gradually distanced itself from the West, adopting domestic and foreign policies fueled by Ottoman and Islamist impulses.

Turkey has been on the road to an authoritarian regime for several years. Infringements on human rights have gradually increased. In truth, Turkey has never had a political system with checks and balances able to constrain attempts to consolidate power around one politician. In recent years, Erdogan has weakened further the few constitutional constraints against the 'Putinization' of the Turkish political system.

Foci of power, such as the bureaucracy, the banking system, industrial associations and trade unions have been mostly coopted by the AKP.

The longer Erdogan rules, the more power hungry he seems. His authoritarian personality becomes clearer every day. The press is hardly free. Erdogan arrests even Islamist journalists that are critical of his policies. His party has infiltrated the judicial system and the police. Foci of power, such as the bureaucracy, the banking system, industrial associations and trade unions have been mostly coopted by the AKP. Opposition political parties are largely discredited. The military, once active in politics as the defender of the Kemalist secular tradition, has been successfully sidelined.

From a realpolitik perspective, the domestic political developments, deplorable as they may be in Turkey, could be ignored by the democratic West as long as Ankara continues to be a useful ally. Unfortunately, Turkey no longer qualifies as a trusted ally.

The most recent examples of nefarious Turkish behavior are its support of ISIS and Hamas. Turkey is playing a double game on the issue of the Islamic State. It pretends to cooperate with the US policy in the attempt to contain radical Islam, but actually Turkey supports ISIS. It allows volunteers passage through Turkish territory to join ISIS in Iraq. ISIS receives logistical support via Turkey, and sends its wounded militants for treatment there. Turkish military forces stood idly by the besieged city of Kobani, just across the Turkish border, while the Islamists killed Kurdish fighters. Finally, Turkey denies the American air force access to Turkish bases; forcing the US to use far away bases when attacking ISIS targets.

Turkey is also openly supporting another radical Islamist organization – Hamas. Despite the fact that the West regards Hamas a terrorist organization, Ankara regularly hosts Hamas representatives that meet the highest Turkish dignitaries. Hamas, an offshoot of the Muslim Brotherhood, has a rabid anti-American position. Moreover, Salah al-Aruri, a senior Hamas operative, operates out of Istanbul. Recently, the Turkish branch of Hamas was involved in a series of attempts to carry out terrorist attacks against Israel, and in orchestrating a coup against the current leadership of the Palestinian Authority.

Such behavior should not surprise policy makers in Washington. In 2003, Ankara denied the request from Washington to open its territory so that the US military could attack Saddam Hussein's forces from two separate fronts.

AKP-ruled Ankara also defied American preferences on Syria, a country allied with radical Iran and on the American list of states supporting terrorism. In January 2004, Bashar Assad became the first Syrian president ever to visit Turkey. In April 2009, the two states conducted their first ever joint military exercise. No other NATO member had such close relations with the authoritarian regime in Damascus, which has been closely allied with Iran for several decades.

Turkey further deviated from the Western consensus in 2008 by hosting Sudanese President Omar Hassan al-Bashir twice. Bashir, who was charged with war crimes and genocide in Darfur, presided over an Islamist regime.

Turkey has consistently defied advice from Washington to tone down its anti-Israel statements and mend relations with an important American ally.

Turkey even welcomed the president of the Islamic Republic of Iran, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, for a visit in August 2008. No Western country has issued such an invitation to the Iranian leader. Additionally, Erdogan congratulated Ahmadinejad immediately after his re-election in June 2009. When it comes to Iran's nuclear threat, Ankara, unlike its NATO allies, has refused to adopt the U.S. stance on harsher sanctions, fearing in part the economic consequences of such steps. In June 2010, Turkey voted at the UN Security Council against a US-sponsored resolution meant to impose a new round of sanctions on Iran.

Turkey also has consistently defied advice from Washington to tone down its anti-Israel statements and mend relations with an important American ally. All American efforts in this direction have failed.

There is also a clear divergence between the US and Turkey on important global issues such as Russia and China. For example, the US. wanted to send ships into the Black Sea via the Bosphorus Straits during the Georgia war in August 2008. Turkey flatly denied several such requests on the pretext that the military vessels were too large. Moreover, Turkey proposed the creation of a regional security framework involving Turkey, Russia, Georgia, Armenia, and Azerbaijan, that left out a NATO role. More blatantly, Turkey has failed to participate in the Western economic sanctions imposed on Russia during the recent Ukraine crisis.

Dissonance exists also with regards to China. While the US fears the rise of China, Turkey sees this country as a potential economic partner and not as a problem. It held military exercises with China. Ankara even considered purchasing anti-aircraft systems from Beijing, an incredibly brazen position for a NATO member!

It is not clear why Washington puts up with such Turkish behavior. The Obama administration seems to be unable to call a spade a spade. It refuses to acknowledge that Turkey is a Trojan horse in NATO, and that Ankara undermines American interests in the Middle East and elsewhere.

Efraim Inbar, director of the Begin-Sadat Center for Strategic Studies, is a professor of political studies at Bar-Ilan University, and a Shillman/Ginsburg fellow at the Middle East Forum.
I do not see any mention of 27,000 Turkish Soldiers that were killed fighting the Korean War.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom