What's new

Trump seeks India’s help to destroy Pak nukes

He's a joke.
He's actually winning .his entire competition is a joke , apart from Sanders I doubt there is any candidate that's worth the title . Anyway trump regardless of his publicity stunts is a offensive business man , he knows how to run a country better than most .
India has a lower Nuclear Safety Index than Pakistan; so he should be worried about India more.
Lol in your dreams maybe, but in reality the facts says otherwise .Pakistan is in the bottom of the list .

qBNHhLS.jpg


Y761Gms.jpg
 
.
He's actually winning .his entire competition is a joke , apart from Sanders I doubt there is any candidate that's worth the title . Anyway trump regardless of his publicity stunts is a offensive business man , he knows how to run a country better than most .

Lol in your dreams maybe, but in reality the facts says otherwise .Pakistan is in the bottom of the list .

qBNHhLS.jpg


Y761Gms.jpg

Trump better than most candidates? LOL he is currently the worst.

Clinton will win anyways.

Oh and as for nuclear safety:

https://nuclear-news.net/2016/03/20/indias-poor-nuclear-safety-record-is-alarming/
 
.
US knows one day they will have to arm wrestle with Pakistan!!
 
.
lot of bad propaganda about him, he's actually to the left of Hillary when it comes to American military interventionism.
you know what? he does say some really logical things which no other politician says. I mean people focus on his outrageous views about coloured races etc. but his non-intervention makes sense.. in addition to dealing with terrorists in one swift decisive blow.

I agree with you .. Hillary is a Hawk
 
.
I agree with Noam Chomsky's (proof that some of the nicest,brightest people are Jews) take on what USA is all about. A country beholden to big business. The President is just a face to keep corporate sector secure. Even this idiot wins nothing major will change.

Link > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noam_Chomsky
 
.
For the third time in a year, the Republican frontrunner discussed Pakistan and the need to eliminate its nuclear arsenal.

Between mangled sentences and sloppy syntax, Trump managed to convey on Wednesday that Pakistan worries him a great deal, and while he has a profound distrust of the country, its instability is manageable, and he would like to keep Washington’s relationship with it on an even keel- sans its nuclear weapons.

Asked at a town-hall meeting in Indianapolis about Pakistan, Trump responded: ”Yes, but the problem with Pakistan, where they have nuclear weapons- which is a real problem.”

”And it’s not the only country, you have nine countries right now with nuclear weapons,” Trump said, adding, ”But Pakistan is semi-unstable. We don’t want to see total instability. It’s not that much, relatively speaking. We have a little bit of a good relationship. I think I’d try and keep it.”

Suggesting that precipitate or punitive action against Pakistan might see it collapse altogether, he rambled on about how ”we give them money and we help them out, but if we don’t, I think that would go on the other side of the ledger and that could really be a disaster,” before cryptically remarking, ”At the same time, if you look at India and some of the others, maybe they’ll be helping us out, because we’re going to look at it.”

In one interview, he bluntly said the U.S should stop giving any aid to Pakistan till it gets rid of its nukes. In another interview he compared it to North Korea while describing it as the most dangerous country in the world that could go rogue.

Trump’s latest remarks came hours after he delivered what was described a ”presidential” foreign policy speech in Washington DC, read out from a teleprompter to give it the form and structure that he seldom manages in his impromptu remarks.
http://www.pakistantoday.com.pk/2016/04/29/national/trump-seeks-indias-help-to-destroy-pak-nukes/

The americans are genocidal racist maniacs. When you examine the holocaust they committed against Iraq (2003-2012) and their historical extermination of the red indians this becomes very apparent. Not to mention Afghanistan, Vietnam etc. Diplomacy means nothing. The rule of the jungle is the rule of the world. The americans masscared the innocent Iraqis even when world opinion was aginst this. The americans will destroy anyone they don't like who is really weak no matter what anyone says or does. That's why it is imperative that Pakiatan somehow becomes a military major/super power. The americans want to do to Muslims what they did to the red indians. The fact that they can't because there are nearly 2 billion of us and we are far better fighters than the red indians really upsets them. So when these american psychos say that Pakistan is dangerous and is a threat, that they should not have nuclear weapons then I take it as a compliment. Pakistan is definitely doing something right to upset the child murderers.
 
.
you know what? he does say some really logical things which no other politician says. I mean people focus on his outrageous views about coloured races etc. but his non-intervention makes sense.. in addition to dealing with terrorists in one swift decisive blow.

I agree with you .. Hillary is a Hawk
he's a populist who has the pulse of America down, and the general population there is not looking for long military entanglements in the middle east anymore, be sure of that.

he's super hawkish on the so called ISIS

but reached out to Putin, which is a 'big man' thing to do, offer an olive branch from a position of immense strength (US sanctions are killing Russia and NATO dwarfs them conventionally)

and he's not going to round up any muslims or any other other brown, black, arab, yellow or latinos up

imo crooked Hillary will be worse than Bush and Obama combined, this guy is very common sense in comparison.
 
.
for us even a damage or ISIS graffiti on the signboard showing the direction to Kahuta research Laboratories or Nilore Nuclear plant will amount to an attack on Pakistani nukes.. I know how the media mill goes on the over drive
Yeh AQ Khan saab ke kaamo ka khamiaza hai...
This is what happens when you leverage long term loss against a short term benefit.
 
.
Hillary Clinton will win the election

Yeh AQ Khan saab ke kaamo ka khamiaza hai...
This is what happens when you leverage long term loss against a short term benefit.

What about May 2 / 2011 ; that just blew up the US Pakistan relationship for ever
 
.
The irony here is, a huge number of Americans and the world at large is probably more worried about Trump + nuclear weapons.

A man this stoopid, arrogant, and with such toxic ignorance, God forbid he has control of the button.
 
.
I doubt if Pakistan is viewed positively in the US. That guy just goes with the flow, as in what Americans voters want to hear. He appeals to a certain demographic of Americans. They do not care about what outrageous things he has said, and however contradictory his remarks may be. Trump is just being Trump.

He also has a powerful persuasive speaking ability which is very important for any successful presidential candidate.
 
.
.
Maybe you should stay updated instead of making a fool of yourself . That article was from 2014 my data is from 2016.

http://ntiindex.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/NTI_2016-Index-Report_MAR-25-2.pdf

As of 2016 we rank above you . It's funny that Pakistanis are so proud of those nuclear "accomplishments", comparing your nuclear technology to India is a bad joke.

you only have 3 nuclear reactors , while India has 21 & 6 currently being constructed . While India has one of the largest nuclear programs in the world , while being the biggest importer of nuclear fuel & having 25% of the worlds thorium deposits .
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom