What's new

Trilateral memorandum between Türkiye, Finland and Sweden

Trilateral memorandum between Türkiye, Finland and Sweden​

  1. Today the representatives of Turkiye, Finland and Sweden, under the auspices of the NATO Secretary General, have agreed the following.
  2. NATO is an Alliance based on the principles of collective defence and the indivisibility of security, as well as on common values. Turkiye, Finland and Sweden affirm their adherence to the principles and values enshrined in the Washington Treaty.
  3. One of the key elements of the Alliance is unwavering solidarity and cooperation in the fight against terrorism, in all its forms and manifestations, which constitutes a direct threat to the national security of Allies as well as to international peace and security.
  4. As prospective NATO Allies, Finland and Sweden extend their full support to Turkiye against threats to its national security. To that effect, Finland and Sweden will not provide support to YPG/PYD, and the organisation described as FETO in Turkiye. Turkiye also extends its full support to Finland and Sweden against threats to their national security. Finland and Sweden reject and condemn terrorism in all its forms and manifestations, in the strongest terms. Finland and Sweden unambiguously condemn all terrorist organisations perpetrating attacks against Turkiye, and express their deepest solidarity with Turkiye and the families of the victims.
  5. Finland and Sweden confirm that the PKK is a proscribed terrorist organisation. Finland and Sweden commit to prevent activities of the PKK and all other terrorist organisations and their extensions, as well as activities by individuals in affiliated and inspired groups or networks linked to these terrorist organisations. Turkiye, Finland and Sweden have agreed to step up cooperation to prevent the activities of these terrorist groups. Finland and Sweden reject the goals of these terrorist organisations.
  6. Further to this, Finland refers to several recent amendments of its Criminal Code by which new acts have been enacted as punishable terrorist crimes. The latest amendments entered into force on 1 January 2022, by which the scope of participation in the activity of a terrorist group has been widened. At the same time, public incitement related to terrorist offenses was criminalised as a separate offense. Sweden confirms that a new, tougher, Terrorist Offenses Act enters into force on 1 July, and that the government is preparing further tightening of counter-terrorism legislation.
  7. Turkiye, Finland and Sweden confirm that now there are no national arms embargoes in place between them. Sweden is changing its national regulatory framework for arms exports in relation to NATO Allies. In future, defence exports from Finland and Sweden will be conducted in line with Alliance solidarity and in accordance with the letter and spirit of article 3 of the Washington Treaty.
  8. Today, Turkiye, Finland and Sweden commit to the following concrete steps:
    • Establish a joint, structured dialogue and cooperation mechanism at all levels of government, including between law enforcement and intelligence agencies, to enhance cooperation on counter-terrorism, organised crime, and other common challenges as they so decide.
    • Finland and Sweden will conduct the fight against terrorism with determination, resolve, and in accordance with the provisions of the relevant NATO documents and policies, and will take all required steps to tighten further domestic legislation to this end.
    • Finland and Sweden will address Turkiye's pending deportation or extradition requests of terror suspects expeditiously and thoroughly, taking into account information, evidence and intelligence provided by Turkiye, and establish necessary bilateral legal frameworks to facilitate extradition and security cooperation with Turkiye, in accordance with the European Convention on Extradition.
    • Finland and Sweden will investigate and interdict any financing and recruitment activities of the PKK and all other terrorist organisations and their extensions, as well affiliates or inspired groups or networks as outlined in paragraph 5.
    • Turkiye, Finland and Sweden commit to fight disinformation, and prevent their domestic laws from being abused for the benefit or promotion of terrorist organisations, including through activities that incite violence against Turkiye.
    • Finland and Sweden will ensure that their respective national regulatory frameworks for arms exports enable new commitments to Allies and reflects their status as NATO members.
    • Finland and Sweden commit to support the fullest possible involvement of Turkiye and other non-EU Allies in the existing and prospective initiatives of the European Union's Common Security and Defence Policy, including Turkiye's participation in the PESCO Project on Military Mobility.
  9. For the implementation of these steps, Turkiye, Finland and Sweden will establish a Permanent Joint Mechanism, with the participation of experts from the Ministries of Foreign Affairs, Interior, and Justice, as well as Intelligence Services and Security Institutions. The Permanent Joint Mechanism will be open for others to join.
  10. Turkiye confirms its long-standing support for NATO's Open Door policy, and agrees to support at the 2022 Madrid Summit the invitation of Finland and Sweden to become members of NATO.
 
The No of Yesterday became a Yes.
The demand for extradition suddenly became just an agreement that request should be handled promptly, but according to normal procedures.
This means that politicians cannot promise any extraditions, since they are not allowed to involve themselves in such decisions according to Swedish Law.
President Erdogan: "We have recorded our reservations and requests. If the promises made are not fulfilled, the entry of these countries into NATO will not pass from our parliament."

The first indicator will be the extradition of 73 terrorists, Which is promised by Swedish counterparts.

If these terrorists are not extradited, the Grand National Assembly will certainly not look favorably on this decision.

The process will be very slow, Even if you don't wait 20 years like Macedonia.
 
Last edited:
Has the extradition of terrorists from Sweden started?
 
There's obviously a misunderstanding of the agreement on the Swedish side. Until the Turkish parliament ratifies the NATO accession of both countries, there's no done deal to begin with.

Not only the government must stop its support for Communist terrorists, the Swedish state must also ensure that Civil organizations aren't allowed to support PKK and YPG.

I feel like many people in the North are having troubles understanding what Turkey's rightful demands are. This is just a MoU and not an agreement.
That make sense, it look as if Turkey just gave in looking at Western Media.
 
Greece again?
Why should you Turks always bring Greece as a comparison?
Finally getting serious.
You have more messages with Turkish state than all Turkish members, from this topic up to even in the most irrelevant threads like Egypt/ME etc..

Regarding the four-way meeting at the NATO summit: Half of the messages on the subject belong to you and you are doing openly anti-TR propaganda here. All I do is hold a mirror.
 
Last edited:
You have more messages with Turkish state than all Turkish members, from this topic up to even in the most irrelevant threads like Egypt/ME etc..

Regarding the four-way meeting at the NATO summit: Half of the messages on the subject belong to you and you are doing openly anti-TR propaganda here. All I do is hold a mirror.

Since you are monitor my threads and my comments, bring me ONE comment or ONE thread, which I started first and is about Turkey?
What I have commented and mention Turkey, are usually in response to Turkish members, and naturally concern Greece, as I did to you.

Regarding the four-way meeting at the NATO summit: Half of the messages on the subject belong to you and you are doing openly anti-TR propaganda here. All I do is hold a mirror.
There are many types of mirrors, what you hold is a question. As far as NATO is concerned, you became the focus of the summit because of your opposition to the entry of Finland and Sweden. Even today, while you signed a memorandum, you are selling spirit and swag that you will not pass it through your parliament, if the extradition of 73 political refugees from Sweden is not accepted.
So who should look in the mirror?

And as you can see, I didn't even mention the problems that are being created by Turkey in the Aegean and Cyprus, even though your government said that it would bring them to the summit, but in the end, nothing came of it.
 
Has the extradition of terrorists from Sweden started?
Calling someone a terrorist is easy in an authoritarian regime.
But in liberal democracies, you have to prove it.
And who decides whether someone is a terrorist or not?
Obviously the Swedish judiciary, which is independent from the government.
 

MashAllah. I am glad to see that Turkey is exerting its influence. I want to see a more powerful Turkey that has its own voice and opinion. Turkey is a very influential and powerful country in its own right. It is good to see that Turkey is exploiting this to maximum.
 
Currently, they have sent 3-4 of them, but it is not enough....
Currently...... has many meanings.
And since the Swedes say otherwise, can you confirm exactly when extradition took place?
 
President Erdogan: "We have recorded our reservations and requests. If the promises made are not fulfilled, the entry of these countries into NATO will not pass from our parliament."

The first indicator will be the extradition of 73 terrorists, Which is promised by Swedish counterparts.

If these terrorists are not extradited, the Grand National Assembly will certainly not look favorably on this decision.

The process will be very slow, Even if you don't wait 20 years like Macedonia.
Erdogan is likely lying, because the Swedish Government does not have the authority to promise extradition of any specific individual.
it would be a severe crime according to the Swedish constitution,
It is also not mentioned in the trilateral agreement.
Any extradition request would be handled by courts, and according to the agreement should follow European standards.

President Erdoğan: "Sweden will send 73 terrorists to us. Currently, they have sent 3-4 of them, but it is not enough. The Ministry of Justice and Foreign Affairs with MIT will closely follow up process. "

Sweden is continuously getting requests for extradition, and some are granted, and some are not granted. It all depends on the evidence Turkey is providing.
In several cases Turkey is simply sloppy and does not follow up when the information is incomplete.
 
Since Sweden has not provided any funding or weapons to YPG so far, this is not controversial.
The trilateral agreement does not force other NATO,countries to change their stance vs YPG/PYD, and since the US is the primary source for YPG weaponry (including AT-4s) i5 does not change things a lot.
 
Since Sweden has not provided any funding or weapons to YPG so far, this is not controversial.
The trilateral agreement does not force other NATO,countries to change their stance vs YPG/PYD, and since the US is the primary source for YPG weaponry (including AT-4s) i5 does not change things a lot.
YPG it is not a terrorist organization under European and American law.
Did something change with Sweden?
 
Better make sure the west is honest with Turkey, I get the feel they are just talking Hot Air as usual or just break the agreement when both are in NATO and Turkey cannot do anything about it.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom