What's new

Transparency International releases corruption rankings for 2014

faisal6309

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Apr 27, 2012
Messages
3,861
Reaction score
8
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
Transparency International releases corruption rankings for 2014

Capture.PNG

BERLIN: The following is a list of the top- and bottom-ranked 10 nations - plus 10 big economies in the mid-range - on graft watchdog Transparency International's 2014 Corruption Perceptions Index, released Wednesday (Dec 3).

The index score relates to perceptions of the degree of corruption as seen by country analysts and business people, and ranges from zero, which is highly corrupt, to 100, which is very clean.

(The equals symbol means nations share the same rank)

TOP TEN:

1. Denmark 92

2. New Zealand 91

3. Finland 89

4. Sweden 87

5. Norway 86

= Switzerland 86

7. Singapore 84

8. Netherlands 83

9. Luxembourg 82

10. Canada 81

TEN IN MID-RANGE:

12. Germany 79

14. Britain 78

15. Japan 76

17. United States 74

26. France 69

64. Turkey 45

69. Brazil 43

85. India 38

100. China 36

136. Russia 27

BOTTOM TEN:

166. Eritrea 18

= Libya 18

= Uzbekistan 18

169. Turkmenistan 17

170. Iraq 16

171. South Sudan 15

172. Afghanistan 12

173. Sudan 11

174. North Korea 8

= Somalia 8

The full list will be published on Transparency International - The Global Anti-Corruption Coalition

- AFP/by

Transparency International releases corruption rankings for 2014 - Channel NewsAsia
2014 Corruption Perceptions Index -- Results
http://files.transparency.org/content/download/1856/12434/file/2014_CPIBrochure_EN.pdf

CORPORATE SECRECY, GLOBAL MONEY LAUNDERING MAKES IT HARDER FOR EMERGING ECONOMIES TO FIGHT CORRUPTION

Corruption is a problem for all economies, requiring leading financial centres in the EU and US to act together with fast-growing economies to stop the corrupt from getting away with it, anti-corruption group Transparency International said today.

In the 20th edition of the Corruption Perceptions Index, scores for China (with a score of 36 out of 100), Turkey (45) and Angola (19) were among the biggest fallers with a drop of 4 or 5 points, despite average economic growth of more than 4 per cent over the last four years. Click here for the full index.

“The 2014 Corruption Perceptions Index shows that economic growth is undermined and efforts to stop corruption fade when leaders and high level officials abuse power to appropriate public funds for personal gain,” said José Ugaz, the chair of Transparency International.

“Corrupt officials smuggle ill-gotten assets into safe havens through offshore companies with absolute impunity,” Ugaz added. “Countries at the bottom need to adopt radical anti-corruption measures in favour of their people. Countries at the top of the index should make sure they don’t export corrupt practices to underdeveloped countries.”

More than two thirds of the 175 countries in the 2014 Corruption Perceptions Index score below 50, on a scale from 0 (perceived to be highly corrupt) to 100 (perceived to be very clean). Denmark comes out on top in 2014 with a score of 92 while North Korea and Somalia share last place, scoring just eight.

The scores of several countries rose or fell by four points or more. The biggest falls were in Turkey (-5), Angola, China, Malawi and Rwanda (all -4). The biggest improvers were Côte d´Ivoire, Egypt, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines (+5), Afghanistan, Jordan, Mali and Swaziland (+4).

The Corruption Perceptions Index is based on expert opinions of public sector corruption. Countries’ scores can be helped by open government where the public can hold leaders to account, while a poor score is a sign of prevalent bribery, lack of punishment for corruption and public institutions that don’t respond to citizens’ needs.

Corruption in emerging economies

China’s score fell to 36 in 2014 from 40 in 2013, despite the fact the Chinese government launched an anti-corruption campaign targeting corrupt public officials. The government has recognized the need to follow officials who hide ill-gotten gains overseas. This January, leaked documents revealed 22,000offshore clients from China and Hong Kong, including many of the country’s leaders.

The score matches a poor performance by Chinese companies in Transparency International’s recent report on corporate disclosure practices where all eight Chinese companies scored less than three out of ten.

Corruption and money laundering are also problems for the other BRIC countries. This year has seen questions raised related to a major oil company using secret companies to bribe politicians in Brazil (which scores 43), questions about Indians (38) using bank accounts in Mauritius (54) and Russians (27) doing the same in Cyprus (63).

“Grand corruption in big economies not only blocks basic human rights for the poorest but also creates governance problems and instability. Fast-growing economies whose governments refuse to be transparent and tolerate corruption, create a culture of impunity in which corruption thrives,” said Ugaz.

Countries on top must fight global corruption

Transparency International called on countries at the top of the index where public sector corruption is limited to stop encouraging it elsewhere by doing more to prevent money laundering and to stop secret companies from masking corruption.

While top performer Denmark has strong rule of law, support for civil society and clear rules governing the behaviour of those in public positions, it also set an example this November, announcing plans to create a public register including beneficial ownership information for all companies incorporated in Denmark. This measure, similar to those announced by Ukraine and the UK, will make it harder for the corrupt to hide behind companies registered in another person’s name.

The anti-corruption group is currently running a campaign to Unmask the Corrupt, urging European Union, United States and G20 countries to follow Denmark’s lead and create public registers that would make clear who really controls, or is the beneficial owner, of every company.

“None of us would fly on planes that do not register passengers, yet we allow secret companies to conceal illegal activity. Public registers that show who really owns a company would make it harder for the corrupt to take off with the spoils of their abuse of power,” said Transparency International Managing Director Cobus de Swardt.

Press release - Corruption Perceptions Index 2014: Clean growth at risk
 
.
I don't believe most of these rankings made by west.The only thing these rankings show is just arrogance,ignorance and prejudice of westerners.You guys should not take these rankings seriously too.
 
. . .
I don't believe most of these rankings made by west.The only thing these rankings show is just arrogance,ignorance and prejudice of westerners.You guys should not take these rankings seriously too.
China can counter that by creating a Chinese version of Transparency International. Easy enough, right ?
 
. . .
Good news are coming from every where congrats Pakistan
 
.
I live in Europe my whole life and never experienced corruption in any form yet.
You are in Switzerland. People are usually corrupt where system is corrupt or daily income is low / below the standards.
 
.
You are in Switzerland. People are usually corrupt where system is corrupt or daily income is low / below the standards.
Well i wouldnt call the rest of Europe much worse than Switzerland to be honest.
 
.
North Korea is poor, autocratic, but not so corrupt
 
.
I don't believe most of these rankings made by west.The only thing these rankings show is just arrogance,ignorance and prejudice of westerners.You guys should not take these rankings seriously too.
nobody takes it seriously
all i say after see this map
bad bad world
 
.
Bhutan best amongst SAARC countries.....ranked 30th.
 
.
I don't believe most of these rankings made by west.The only thing these rankings show is just arrogance,ignorance and prejudice of westerners.You guys should not take these rankings seriously too.
FYI,

Transparency internation Board of Directors.

José Carlos Ugaz
Chair, Peru
Elena A. Panfilova Vice-Chair, Russia
Sion Assidon Morocco
Emile Carr Sierra Leone
Jeremy Carver United Kingdom
Mercedes de Freitas Venezuela
Sergej Muravjov Lithuania
Mark Mullen Georgia
Natalia Soebagjo Indonesia
Elisabeth Ungar Bleier Colombia
J. C. Weliamuna Sri Lanka
Iftekhar Zaman Bangladesh

Our Organisation - Board of directors

The Individual Members are listed below, together with their respective Registers of Interests (RoI):
  • Azeddine Akesbi, Morocco
  • Sion Assidon, Morocco
  • Alma Balcazar, Colombia
  • Nancy Boswell, USA
  • Jermyn Brooks, United Kingdom
  • Laurence Cockcroft, United Kingdom
  • Peter Conze, Germany
  • Brian Cooksey, Tanzania
  • Boris Divjak, Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Peter Eigen, Germany
  • Lilian Ekeanyanwu, Nigeria
  • Hansjörg Elshorst, Germany
  • Oby Ezekwesili, Nigeria
  • Delia Ferreira Rubio, Argentina
  • Dieter Frisch, Belgium
  • John Githongo, Kenya
  • Roslyn Hees, Ireland
  • Fritz Heimann, USA
  • Michael Hershman, USA
  • Kamal Hossain, Bangladesh
  • Karen Hussmann, Germany
  • Huguette Labelle, Canada
  • Pierre Landell-Mills, United Kingdom
  • Chong San Lee, Malaysia
  • Akere Muna, Cameroon
  • Trevor Munroe, Jamaica
  • Donal O'Leary, Ireland
  • Rosa Inés Ospina Robledo, Colombia
  • Peter L. Rooke, Australia
  • José Ugaz, Peru
  • Frank Vogl, USA
  • Michael H. Wiehen, Germany
Our Organisation - Individual members

The members of the Advisory Council:
Peter Eigen, Chairman of the Advisory Council (Short bio)
Germany
Founder and former Chair of Transparency International
EITI Special Representative and member of the African Progress Panel
Abdulatif Al-Hamad
Kuwait
Director General/Chairman of the Board of Directors, Arab Fund for Economic and Social Development
Oscar Arias Sanchez
Costa Rica
Peace Nobel Prize Laureate and Former President of Costa Rica
Paul Batchelor
United Kingdom
Chairman of Crown Agents and Former Deputy Chair of Global Geographies, PricewaterhouseCoopers
Peter Berry
United Kingdom
Former Chairman of Crown Agents
John Brademas
USA
President Emeritus of New York University
Jimmy Carter
USA
Former President
Ugo Draetta
Italy
Professor of International Law, Catholic University of Milan
Former Vice President of General Electric Company
Dolores L. Español
Philippines
Former presiding Judge of Regional Trial Court
Dieter Frisch
Germany
Former Director General for Development at the European Commission
Ekaterina Genieva
Russia
Director General of State Library for Foreign Literature, Moscow
John Githongo
Kenya
Vice president of policy and advocacy, World Vision International
Former Permanent Secretary for Ethics and Governance in the office of the President, Kenya
HRH Prince El Hassan bin Talal
Jordan
Founder of the Royal Institute of Interfaith Studies
Former President of the Club of Rome
Fritz Heimann
USA
Founding Member of Transparency International
Kamal Hossain
Bangladesh
Former Minister of Foreign Affairs
Irene Khan
Bangladesh
Former Secretary General of Amnesty International,
Director-General of the International Development Law Organization,
Chancellor of the University of Salford, UK
Tawakkol Karman
Yemen
Nobel Peace Prize Laureate,
President of Women Journalists Without Chains
Michael Kirby
Australia
Former Justice of the High Court
Goh Kun
Korea (South)
Former Prime Minister and former Mayor of Seoul
Pascal Lamy
France
Former Director General of the World Trade Organisation
Honorary President of Notre Europe – Jacques Delors Institute
Former Trade Commissioner of the European Union
Ronald MacLean Abaroa
Bolivia
Former Mayor of La Paz
Former Minister of Foreign Affairs
Ira Millstein
USA
Senior Partner of Weil, Gotshal & Manges
Festus Mogae
Botswana
Former President
Kumi Naidoo
South Africa
Executive Director of Greenpeace
Olusegun Obasanjo
Nigeria
Former President
Ahmedou Ould-Abdallah
Mauritania
Special Representative of the UN Secretary General for West Africa
Former Executive Secretary of the Global Coalition for Africa
Khun Anand Panyarachun
Thailand
Former Prime Minister
Chairman of Siam Commercial Bank PCL
Devendra Raj Panday
Nepal
Former Finance Minister of Nepal and Human Rights Advocate
Hartmut Ruppel
Namibia
Board of Trustees of the Members of Parliament
Former Attorney General
Augustine Ruzindana
Uganda
Former Member of Parliament
Soli J. Sorabjee
India
Former Attorney General
Virginia Tsouderos
Greece
Former Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs
Jessica Tuchman Mathews
USA
President of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
Frank Vogl
USA
Former Vice-Chairman of Transparency International
President of Vogl Communications, Inc
Joe Wanjui
Kenya
Chancellor of University of Nairobi
Richard von Weizsäcker
Germany
Former President
Michael Wiehen
Germany
Former Executive of the World Bank and Attorney

Our Organisation - Advisory council

Yes, VERY western....
 
.
This is from their site
Five reasons corruption is getting worse in China | space for transparency

Frankly, upon reading their reasoning for why corruption is supposedly "getting worse", my impression is that their arguments can be essentially summed up as "we don't like China's political system, so we are going to assume this means corruption".
For example, this is their argument:
"The lack of competitive political processes, institutional checks and balances and accountability mechanisms, an independent judiciary and a free press increase the regime’s susceptibility to corruption”

Apparently, if the Chinese decide not to sabotage each other all day like the democrats and republicans, it actually counts as corruption. The fact it also argued:
"The delivery of criminal justice is relatively effective, but compromised by political interference."

So, apparently, even though the western agencies are forced to admit delivery of criminal justice is effective, they are counting "political interference", which, I will bet 100 bucks, concerns the cases for western paid "human rights activists" or "religious activists".

Seriously, by this standard, corporations paying millions of dollar as "party building funds" to political parties to far their interests apparently don't count as corruption as long as they file a receipt for it.
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom