I would have to apologize for any perceived amount of candor or plain speak that my Pakistani friends might consider my post to be.With the disclaimer out of the way,Let's examine your thesis :
Myth 1.
Pakistan lost all 3 wars with India.
Pakistan and India have fought 3 wars - 1948, 1965 and 1971.
Barring 1971 (which occurred while a civil war, assisted by India, was raging in East Pakistan), no war has resulted in a decisive 'victory' for either side.
My Conclusion#
Factually weak. You are trying to draw quintessentially flawed arguments from the fact that an instrument of surrender was never signed by Pakistan.But neutral observers have always in fact credited India as the victor.I am not going to post these assessments since this is a Pakistani website and it should be respected.You could look up the same.
Myth 2.
Pakistan fights through proxies
Well, this is true. Pakistan has supported Kashmiri Freedom fighters in Indian Occupied Kashmir, and did support the Mujahideen (with US and Saudi support) and later the Taliban.
However, this allegation by Indians completely overlooks India's own long association with proxy groups.
Supported proxies that destabilized East Pakistan for many years leading into 1971
Supported the LTTE (Tamil Tigers) - a terrorist organization in Sri Lanka
Supported the Northern Alliance - a group of warlords and criminals in Afghanistan
Supported Baluch insurgents in Pakistan
My Conclusion#
The L.T.T.E accusation is true.However,they were broken off at a very preliminary stage as India decided the best way to fight for Tamil rights was through talks.The Indian Peace Keeping Force was deployed and actively took on the L.T.T.E.As a result,Rajiv Gandhi was assassinated by the LTTE cadres fearing his return to power might mean the redeployment of IPKF in Sri Lanka
The other groups have never expressed any affiliation with India as far I know.The notion that India is funding them doesn't hold water as India has no leverage with such groups.
PS#Wasn't the Northern Alliance founded by Pakistan?
Myth 3.
India has never committed aggression against Pakistan, or any other country.
This is clearly not the case as seen below
Support for insurgents in East Pakistan leding into 1971 and the ensuing war
Support for the LTTE (a terrorist organization in Sri Lanka) against the Sri Lankan State
The invasion of Siachen in 1984 in clear violation of the Simla Accord
Support for the Baluch insurgency
My Conclusion#
See Riposte above.Till date, India hasn't resorted to millitary action without provocation;
1948-Invasion of Indian held territory by Pakistan
1965-Invasion of Indian held territory by Pakistan
1971-Preemptive air strike on eleven Indian airbases.
India responded after practically begging the International community to call for an end to the genocide.I wouldn't term any as aggression.We enjoy international support for being peaceful and we would like to keep it that way
Myth 4.
Pakistan spends 70% (or more, depending upon the Indian) of its budget on Defense.
Pakistan's defence budget for 2009 was about 4.4 billion USD. With a GDP of about 160 billion USD and a budget of 33 billion USD, that works out to be about 2.75% of GDP and 13.3% of the total budget.
PAKISTAN'S TOTAL OUTLAY IN 2007-08 BUDGET TO BE ABOUT US$33 BLN. | Goliath Business News
This compares with an Indian defence budget of about 26 billion that is 14.4% of the total budget and about 2.3% - so what's the big deal with Pakistan's defence budget?
My Conclusion#
As an Indian,It would be irrelevant for me as to what Pakistan's defense Balance Sheet looks like.More of a "smoke em if you got em" guy
Myth 5.
Pakistani politics is dominated by Kashmir
This argument goes along the lines of 'the Army/leadership makes sure that the only thing Pakistanis are aware of is Kashmir, and in this way distracts them from socio-economic issues and avoids investing in development'.
No doubt most Pakistanis are aware of Kashmir, but the fact that we have cutthroat national politics, with political parties that have significant ideological differences, it is absurd to suggest that the only issue mentioned during stump speeches is 'Kashmir'.
Most of the PR and advertisements run by Pakistani political parties in fact focus on providing development and bringing about prosperity, not Kashmir. Most politicians talk about providing, jobs, investment etc. and most Pakistanis vote on that basis - even when voting on biraadri lines since they believe 'their guy' will provide them with economic opportunity/favors.
The political process in Pakistan remains largely driven by issues that are important to most people elsewhere in the world - jobs, inflation, development etc.
My Conclusion#
I wouldn't know as I am unaware of the same.But the posture of naming warships and missiles after invaders of India makes me uncomfortable.We need not be the best of friends but We must learn how to coexist peacefully for the sake of the Asian bloc.