Top 100 Aerospace & Defense Companies

[JohnyD]

********2013 Defense News Top 100 Aerospace & Defense Companies*****

1. Lockheed Martin (U.S.) Website Grade: 79%
2. Boeing (U.S.) Website Grade: 83%
3. BAE Systems (U.K.) Website Grade: 74%
4. Raytheon (U.S.) Website Grade: 54%
5. General Dynamics (U.S.) Website Grade: 52%
6. Northrop Grumman (U.S.) Website Grade: 65%
7. EADS (Netherlands) Website Grade: 59%
8. Finmeccanica (Italy) Website Grade: 51%
9. United Technologies (U.S.) Website Grade: 56%
10. L-3 Communications (U.S.) Website Grade: 52%
11. Thales (France) Website Grade: 50%
12. SAIC (U.S.) Website Grade: 66%
13. Huntington Ingalls (U.S.) Website Grade: 51%
14. Almaz-Antey (Russia) Website Grade: 38%
15. Honeywell (U.S.) Website Grade: 57%
16. Rolls-Royce (U.K.) Website Grade: 58%
17. Booz Allen Hamilton (U.S.) Website Grade: 81%
18. Textron (U.S.) Website Grade: 75%
19. Exelis (U.S.) Website Grade: N/A
20. GE (U.S.) Website Grade: 89%
21. Oshkosh (U.S.) Website Grade: 46%
22. DCNS (France) Website Grade: 68%
23. CSC (U.S.) Website Grade: 61%
24. Russian Helicopters (Russia) Website Grade: 44%
25. Safran (France) Website Grade: 51%
26. URS (U.S.) Website Grade: 43%
27. Babcock International (U.K.) Website Grade: 44%
28. DynCorp (U.S.) Website Grade: 44%
29. ATK (U.S.) Website Grade: 67%
30. Saab (Sweden) Website Grade: 58%
31. Rheinmetall (Germany) Website Grade: 40%
32. CACI International (U.S.) Website Grade: 80%
33. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries (Japan) Website Grade: 42%
34. Harris (U.S.) Website Grade: 69%
35. Elbit Systems (Israel) Website Grade: 36%
36. Hewlett-Packard (U.S.) Website Grade: 80%
37. Hindustan Aeronautics (India) Website Grade: 39%
38. Rockwell Collins (U.S.) Website Grade: 49%
39. Israel Aerospace Industries (Israel) Website Grade: 41%
40. Bechtel (U.S.) Website Grade: 49%
41. Mantech (U.S.) Website Grade: 40%
42. General Atomics (U.S.) Website Grade: 48%
43. Aviation Holding Co. (Russia) Website Grade: 45%
44. NEC (Japan) Website Grade: 51%
45. Serco (U.K.) Website Grade: 41%
46. Cobham (U.K.) Website Grade: 63%
47. ST Engineering (Singapore) Website Grade: 40%
48. Fluor (U.S.) Website Grade: 54%
49. United Engine (Russia) Website Grade: 44%
50. GKN (U.K.) Website Grade: 47%
51. Kawasaki Heavy Industries (Japan) Website Grade: 58%
52. Rafael Advanced Defense Systems (Israel) Website Grade: 38%
53. Mitsubishi Electric (Japan) Website Grade: 60%
54. DeNA (Japan) Website Grade: N/A
55. Dassault Aviation (France) Website Grade: 72%
56. Jacobs Engineering (U.S.) Website Grade: 50%
57. QinetiQ (U.K.) Website Grade: 74%
58. Kongsberg (Norway) Website Grade: 49%
59. Fincantieri (Italy) Website Grade: 46%
60. Chemring (U.K.) Website Grade: 46%
61. Embraer (Brazil) Website Grade: 51%
62. Irkut (Russia) Website Grade: 38%
63. Krauss-Maffei Wegmann (Germany) Website Grade: 15%
64. Navistar (U.S.) Website Grade: 41%
65. Samsung Techwin (South Korea) Website Grade: 62%
66. Meggitt (U.K.) Website Grade: 32%
67. RUAG (Switzerland) Website Grade: 38%
68. Ultra Electronics (U.K.) Website Grade: 35%
69. Bharat Electronics (India) Website Grade: 28%
70. Nexter (France) Website Grade: 48%
71. AAR (U.S.) Website Grade: 49%
72. Wyle (U.S.) Website Grade: 49%
73. Cubic (U.S.) Website Grade: 45%
74. Aselsan (Turkey) Website Grade: 25%
75. Accenture (Ireland) Website Grade: 63%
76. Moog (U.S.) Website Grade: 47%
77. LIG Nex1 (South Korea) Website Grade: 23%
78. Patria (Finland) Website Grade: 42%
79. CAE (Canada) Website Grade: 49%
80. RTI Sistema (Russia) Website Grade: 44%
81. Mission Essential (U.S.) Website Grade: 41%
82. Curtiss-Wright (U.S.) Website Grade:39%
83. Alion Science and Technology (U.S.) Website Grade: 41%
84. Diehl Stiftung (Germany) Website Grade: 73%
85. Turkish Aerospace Industries (Turkey) Website Grade: 62%
86. Battelle (U.S.) Website Grade: 64%
87. Korea Aerospace Industries (South Korea) Website Grade: N/A
88. FLIR (U.S.) Website Grade: 51%
89. Toshiba (Japan) Website Grade: 53%
90. Ball Aerospace & Technologies (U.S.) Website Grade: 53%
91. Indra (Spain) Website Grade: 51%
92. Nammo (Norway) Website Grade: 40%
93. RSK MiG (Russia) Website Grade: 38%
94. ViaSat (U.S.) Website Grade: 52%
95. Israel Military Industries (Israel) Website Grade: 46%
96. Denel (South Africa) Website Grade: 17%
97. Fujitsu (Japan) Website Grade: 64%
98. Day & Zimmermann (U.S.) Website Grade: 53%
99. IHI (Japan) Website Grade: 39%
100. Komatsu (Japan) Website Grade: 37%


http://defensecontractormarketing.com/2013-defense-news-top-100/

 

[JohnyD]

Good to see two companies from India…HAL at 37 and Bharat Electronics at 69…

 

[doremon]

this is wrong no chinese companies probably chinese companies dont share much of company secrets with world..

 

[anilindia]

Any Pak company ?

 

[JohnyD]

Any Pak company ?

No Pak company...I don’t think Pak has any professionally managed commercial defense company..

any Pakistani member would like to throw some light on this?

 

[JohnyD]

this is wrong no chinese companies probably chinese companies dont share much of company secrets with world..

As pe Candesic Top 100 Aerospace & Defence Companies 2012, China's AVIChina is at number 67, Xlan Aircraft at number 82 and ChengduAircraftIndustry at number 93..

http://candesic.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/Candesic-Top-100-AD-report-Sept-2012.pdf

 

[Archdemon]

2015

Top 100 | Defense News, News about defense programs, business, and technology

 

[Echo_419]

********2013 Defense News Top 100 Aerospace & Defense Companies*****

1. Lockheed Martin (U.S.) Website Grade: 79%
2. Boeing (U.S.) Website Grade: 83%
3. BAE Systems (U.K.) Website Grade: 74%
4. Raytheon (U.S.) Website Grade: 54%
5. General Dynamics (U.S.) Website Grade: 52%
6. Northrop Grumman (U.S.) Website Grade: 65%
7. EADS (Netherlands) Website Grade: 59%
8. Finmeccanica (Italy) Website Grade: 51%
9. United Technologies (U.S.) Website Grade: 56%
10. L-3 Communications (U.S.) Website Grade: 52%
11. Thales (France) Website Grade: 50%
12. SAIC (U.S.) Website Grade: 66%
13. Huntington Ingalls (U.S.) Website Grade: 51%
14. Almaz-Antey (Russia) Website Grade: 38%
15. Honeywell (U.S.) Website Grade: 57%
16. Rolls-Royce (U.K.) Website Grade: 58%
17. Booz Allen Hamilton (U.S.) Website Grade: 81%
18. Textron (U.S.) Website Grade: 75%
19. Exelis (U.S.) Website Grade: N/A
20. GE (U.S.) Website Grade: 89%
21. Oshkosh (U.S.) Website Grade: 46%
22. DCNS (France) Website Grade: 68%
23. CSC (U.S.) Website Grade: 61%
24. Russian Helicopters (Russia) Website Grade: 44%
25. Safran (France) Website Grade: 51%
26. URS (U.S.) Website Grade: 43%
27. Babcock International (U.K.) Website Grade: 44%
28. DynCorp (U.S.) Website Grade: 44%
29. ATK (U.S.) Website Grade: 67%
30. Saab (Sweden) Website Grade: 58%
31. Rheinmetall (Germany) Website Grade: 40%
32. CACI International (U.S.) Website Grade: 80%
33. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries (Japan) Website Grade: 42%
34. Harris (U.S.) Website Grade: 69%
35. Elbit Systems (Israel) Website Grade: 36%
36. Hewlett-Packard (U.S.) Website Grade: 80%
37. Hindustan Aeronautics (India) Website Grade: 39%
38. Rockwell Collins (U.S.) Website Grade: 49%
39. Israel Aerospace Industries (Israel) Website Grade: 41%
40. Bechtel (U.S.) Website Grade: 49%
41. Mantech (U.S.) Website Grade: 40%
42. General Atomics (U.S.) Website Grade: 48%
43. Aviation Holding Co. (Russia) Website Grade: 45%
44. NEC (Japan) Website Grade: 51%
45. Serco (U.K.) Website Grade: 41%
46. Cobham (U.K.) Website Grade: 63%
47. ST Engineering (Singapore) Website Grade: 40%
48. Fluor (U.S.) Website Grade: 54%
49. United Engine (Russia) Website Grade: 44%
50. GKN (U.K.) Website Grade: 47%
51. Kawasaki Heavy Industries (Japan) Website Grade: 58%
52. Rafael Advanced Defense Systems (Israel) Website Grade: 38%
53. Mitsubishi Electric (Japan) Website Grade: 60%
54. DeNA (Japan) Website Grade: N/A
55. Dassault Aviation (France) Website Grade: 72%
56. Jacobs Engineering (U.S.) Website Grade: 50%
57. QinetiQ (U.K.) Website Grade: 74%
58. Kongsberg (Norway) Website Grade: 49%
59. Fincantieri (Italy) Website Grade: 46%
60. Chemring (U.K.) Website Grade: 46%
61. Embraer (Brazil) Website Grade: 51%
62. Irkut (Russia) Website Grade: 38%
63. Krauss-Maffei Wegmann (Germany) Website Grade: 15%
64. Navistar (U.S.) Website Grade: 41%
65. Samsung Techwin (South Korea) Website Grade: 62%
66. Meggitt (U.K.) Website Grade: 32%
67. RUAG (Switzerland) Website Grade: 38%
68. Ultra Electronics (U.K.) Website Grade: 35%
69. Bharat Electronics (India) Website Grade: 28%
70. Nexter (France) Website Grade: 48%
71. AAR (U.S.) Website Grade: 49%
72. Wyle (U.S.) Website Grade: 49%
73. Cubic (U.S.) Website Grade: 45%
74. Aselsan (Turkey) Website Grade: 25%
75. Accenture (Ireland) Website Grade: 63%
76. Moog (U.S.) Website Grade: 47%
77. LIG Nex1 (South Korea) Website Grade: 23%
78. Patria (Finland) Website Grade: 42%
79. CAE (Canada) Website Grade: 49%
80. RTI Sistema (Russia) Website Grade: 44%
81. Mission Essential (U.S.) Website Grade: 41%
82. Curtiss-Wright (U.S.) Website Grade:39%
83. Alion Science and Technology (U.S.) Website Grade: 41%
84. Diehl Stiftung (Germany) Website Grade: 73%
85. Turkish Aerospace Industries (Turkey) Website Grade: 62%
86. Battelle (U.S.) Website Grade: 64%
87. Korea Aerospace Industries (South Korea) Website Grade: N/A
88. FLIR (U.S.) Website Grade: 51%
89. Toshiba (Japan) Website Grade: 53%
90. Ball Aerospace & Technologies (U.S.) Website Grade: 53%
91. Indra (Spain) Website Grade: 51%
92. Nammo (Norway) Website Grade: 40%
93. RSK MiG (Russia) Website Grade: 38%
94. ViaSat (U.S.) Website Grade: 52%
95. Israel Military Industries (Israel) Website Grade: 46%
96. Denel (South Africa) Website Grade: 17%
97. Fujitsu (Japan) Website Grade: 64%
98. Day & Zimmermann (U.S.) Website Grade: 53%
99. IHI (Japan) Website Grade: 39%
100. Komatsu (Japan) Website Grade: 37%


2013 Defense News Top 100 Aerospace & Defense Companies

Good to see 2 companies from here