What's new

TODAY'S DEFENCE NEWS

These are not ballistic helmets... these are same buckets covered up with camo... these are ballistic helmets:

Nope,the soldier behind is wearing OR-201..by the way,the topic is on NV equipment..and it can be fitted on any kind of helmet..It doesn't necessarily require Ballistic helmet.

another pic...

indra-5.jpg


Isr%20Or%20201_tm.jpg


OR-201


also Patka helmets are quite capable helmets...

http://www.defence.pk/forums/indian-defence/17445-bullet-proof-patka-helmets.html
 
.
Coz u dont have those helmets...

Hows tht a troll bait? indian army still uses those vietnam era helmets... while some soldiers in operational areas use patka helmet which dont have the capacity...

Indeed the Indian infantry do not have PASGT-like helmets with helmet mounts right now. This equipment is going to come in with F-INSAS:


DRDO_F-INSAS.jpg




finsas8.jpg


Along with many other techs the IA infantry has been missing for many years now. As of yet the exact specs and configuration of the F-INSAS are highly classified but the veil will soon be lifted...........




The IA/IN/IAF SFs have access to all the latest tech.

But @desert warrior don't say the Patka doesn't have the capcity or whatever. It is a crude yet very effective design that has served the IA very well over the years. It offers almost unparalleled protection against 7.62mm in close-quarters.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
.
Indeed the Indian infantry do not have PASGT-like helmets with helmet mounts right now. This equipment is going to come in with F-INSAS:


DRDO_F-INSAS.jpg




finsas8.jpg


Along with many other techs the IA infantry has been missing for many years now. As of yet the exact specs and configuration of the F-INSAS are highly classified but the veil will soon be lifted...........




The IA/IN/IAF SFs have access to all the latest tech.

Good going with the F-INSAS programme... but PA combat troops are already using NVGs... even FC is using them...
 
.
Good going with the F-INSAS programme... but PA combat troops are already using NVGs... even FC is using them...

Good for them! But it is unfair to compare the IA to the PA on this front as the IA is 2-3 times larger than the PA in size and it is only recently that finances have swung in favor of the IA over the PA who has always enjoyed a relatively healthy budget for obvious reasons.



And the IA do have NVDs on a fireteam/squad level merely they are hand-held and not helmet-mounted. But like I said, within the next few months/years things will change on this front.
 
.
.
The pic u posted before is not OR-201 ... also OR-201 arent used by regular IA troops... but SFs,paras etc..

I said Indian Army,didn't make any specific claim..and the pic is of OR-201..as the soldier is holding a Tavor,he definitely belongs to some SF,who use Tavor..and India is bying new Ballistic helmets and protective gears as well as indigenous Patka helmets.
 
.
@GR!FF!N there's no point in arguing against the truth. You and I are well aware of the equipment shortcoming for the IA Grunts. Let's not pretend they have the latest and best stuff today, this is just not true. But, that's not to say the situation isn't changing in the near future- look forward, not back.

I said Indian Army,didn't make any specific claim..and the pic is of OR-201..as the soldier is holding a Tavor,he definitely belongs to some SF,who use Tavor..and India is bying new Ballistic helmets and protective gears as well as indigenous Patka helmets.

He's not SF, he is PARA (AIRBORNE).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
.
@GR!FF!N there's no point in arguing against the truth. You and I are well aware of the equipment shortcoming for the IA Grunts. Let's not pretend they have the latest and best stuff today, this is just not true. But, that's not to say the situation isn't changing in the near future- look forward, not back.

nope,I'm not pretending..IA's Induction of new protective gears and Ballistic helmets are stalled over 2 years now due to wrong technical parameters..and which we have is a lot heavier than we could accommodate.also,we've a lot of euipmets to replace,thats not easy too..but yet,Indigenous equipments are not too bad..
 
Last edited by a moderator:
. .
These are not ballistic helmets... these are same buckets covered up with camo... these are ballistic helmets:

hw0pb9.jpg

ou1d2u.jpg

heres RFI for ballistic helmets released in 2010
http://indianarmy.nic.in/writereaddata/RFI/150/RFI BALLISTIC HELMET.pdf

heres the reply regarding the same in parliament by the defence minister in 2011

"Proposals for purchase of Bullet Proof Jackets and Ballistic Helmets are at different stages of procurement in financial year 2011-2012.

This information was given by Defence Minister Shri AK Antony in a written reply to Shri Sardar Sukhdev Singh Libra in Lok Sabha today. "

Print Release

hopefully it'll be completed soon
 
.
Artillery Guns need to be fast tracked. Infrastructural development on Eastern borders should be given top priority.
 
.
There were such policies, at least statements, maybe now this is more official, but at the end it's not worth anything, unless the indigenous industry also can provide something capable. I think 2 years ago Antony stated that we soon won't by a single vessel for IN from foreign shipyards anymore. The reality however is different! More Russian Frigats, foreign LDPs, FSS, SSKs and so on.
The only effect this announcement might have, is that the Indian privat industry might have more interest to invest and participate in this field now. But a foreign product, produced under licence in India won't be an indigenous product, so we need more realism about our capabilities as of now.

Let me quote myself here:

But because the domestic defense market is still in its infancy, Indian firms generally are ill-equipped to meet high-end military requirements on their own.

A senior executive of an overseas defense company said the new rules could lead to forging tie-ups with domestic companies to sell their equipment “repainted” as made in India...

...however, said the policy is not anti-overseas. “Contrary to popular belief, the latest policy is not unfavorable towards foreign companies. Given that ‘Buy Indian’ entails only 30 percent [indigenous content] and ‘Buy and Make Indian’ only 50 percent indigenous content, the policy encourages joint ventures by Indian companies with foreign companies, which should be effectively exploited,” he said

India's New Rules Could Mean More Overseas Tie-ups | Defense News | defensenews.com
 
.
The system has been inducted in two regiments of the Indian Army and eight warships of the Indian Navy.

(i) Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd : 7.62%


Can any one give the list of ships with Brahmos & possible existing ships which can be upgraded with at least 20 years of life remaining considering vessel age of 35?

2nd thing which comes to my mind that HAL is a company which just manufacture the end products, DRDO & other labs are responsible for R&D. Even for a moment if we consider that they are doing R&D but on what subject? Can any one provide a list of the end products which HAL has designed in house with no foreign or limited help(at lwast basic building blocks). & whether it's justified to throw our money on these PSUs which always say that they are beyond our public scrutiny. These my real intention questions which come to my mind. Frankly speaking I have lost my faith in DRDO(few labs) & HAL. At least we should put some boundary in work structure so that there is no overlap in work.
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom