What's new

To hate thy neighbour India

VelocuR

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Jun 4, 2009
Messages
6,188
Reaction score
5
Country
Pakistan
Location
United States
To hate thy neighbour

2013-08-16 12:53:29

Just as I sat down to write this, a new notification popped up on my Facebook feed – a friend had liked a page called ‘I bet Pakistan can get one million fans before India’. Now this friend belongs to a lot that is affluent, foreign-educated and most likely may have had some Indian buddies while in college because who gets us better than a fellow South Asian when living abroad in the West. All that changes when you’re back home though – who better to hate than thy neighbour? Yes, the same neighbour we fought wars with, the same neighbour international wire agencies like to label as our “arch rival”, the same neighbour who has these days again taken prime seat as our enemy number one, while the US and Israel shuffle along on second and third place.

And for this achievement, along with giving credit to some of the politicians on both sides and their flawed policies, we must also praise the media on both sides. For nothing impacts people’s emotions faster than a clip on television showing the evil Indian media and how it is out to get us vulnerable Pakistanis – and vice versa of course.

In the past week, there has been much criticism on India’s ‘jingoistic media’ and how it lacked editorial ethics and responsibility during its coverage on the cross-border firing incidents – some of it deserving and some of it far-fetched. But while we point fingers across the television screens at our neighbour, we must remain alert about our own response as well. Where a large chunk of our media outlets have been praised for their mature reaction compared to their counterpart, some of our local channels couldn’t help flare up the issue further either. Evil India plus acts of aggression will obviously equate to wide interest, viewership and ratings. A recipe that could turn more disastrous than profitable in the long run. Both nations are nuclear powers - one hopes any media, person, institution or group that calls for war or even casually mentions it’s possibility, also realises the consequences of one in this day and age.

There are two ways to easily gather a crowd and a following in Pakistan - one way is to promote uniting for someone/something, the other way is to unite against someone/something – unfortunately, the latter strategy seems to work better than the former when it comes to our masses. Unite against a sect, unite against a minority, unite against an ideology, unite against the state, unite against a dictator, against a politician – against America, against Israel and most importantly, against India.

Well folks, we need to figure out which direction we want to walk towards then. We cannot be promoting dialogue between the two nations during the 6:00pm news and then preach hate sermons later at night during talk shows. If our media has collectively decided to be the more responsible one in this clash, then it should remain persistent instead of joining the war-mongering bandwagon. In a country plagued by disasters, poverty and corruption, people are either completely dejected or they are clouded enough to believe any conspiracy passed their way – anything to blame for their ill fortune. As responsible media outlets, let us not allow ourselves to use their vulnerability for our personal gains.

Stated in an editorial of Dawn yesterday were the following lines:

Some Indian commentators have been quick to repeat their condemnation of what they call Pakistan’s aggressive intent, depending by and large on Indian military feeds. On this side of the border, a number of theories are doing the rounds seeking to explain the Indian need to challenge Pakistan militarily at this moment, again without the facts.

Fortunately, the voices which are able to see war and war-mongering as more than a game to indulge in are stronger today than ever before. These voices mark the real progress that people in both Pakistan and India have made on the path to a peaceful resolution of the problems. They bring out the futility of war, of war-mongering, and have the capacity to be heard loud and clear over the thoughtless cries for violent ‘solutions’.

If Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif is stating that instead of flare-ups and suspension of talks, what the two neighbours need is more dialogue and confidence building, our media should pick up on this – yes, it should ask questions, it should ask how but it should not pick up an argument in instances it has none. A tit for tat with the counterpart is no reason to brainwash millions into believing that all their troubles begin and end with India. Troubles exist with India and troubles exist internally too – as opposed to previous incidents of such sensitivity, let us emerge stronger this time and not toe the same line as before, or as those we oppose. The common man won’t gain from petty politics or war – why fill his mind with those notions when instead we could be uniting for some semblance of peace.
 
we should send her these pro indians to india. let them enjoy there with peace loving indians. i dont why in our country we have many women who loves india alot may be they are interested in bollywood.
 
we should send her these pro indians to india. let them enjoy there with peace loving indians. i dont why in our country we have many women who loves india alot may be they are interested in bollywood.

So you want to linger on with warmongering rather than toning down mutually and stopping this infiltration of LeT militants?
 
So you want to linger on with warmongering rather than toning down mutually and stopping this infiltration of LeT militants?

India should probably vacate Kashmir for that too happen.
 
Pakistani media response had been mature more mature than anyone.

The Same mature response from Pakistan forced badmouthing Karzai to sit calm and think over and visit Pakistan by end of this month.

Now its time Indian media and Indian so-called "nationalists" must stop spreading hate and stop beating war drums.


Even the most reputed international newswires/magz pointed out Indian jingoism and love for hate.


India and Pakistan: Hold the line | The Economist


PERIODS of slight progress punctuated by nerve-shredding crises. That, more or less, describes dealings between South Asia’s two nuclear-armed and mutually suspicious powers. Relations between India and Pakistan have inched forward as onerous visa or trade rules are eased. Now Pakistan has a new prime minister, Nawaz Sharif, who is outspoken about the need for peace. Even Pakistan’s army chief suggests it is possible to overplay the threat from the giant next door.

But no sooner were hopes of reconciliation kindled than violence erupted. Killings on August 6th in Poonch along the “line of control”, the disputed high-altitude border in Jammu and Kashmir, threaten a new chill in relations (see article). India says Pakistani forces laid an ambush in which five soldiers were killed, violating a decade-old ceasefire. Gunfire and mortars, plus bitter accusations, have flown since. On August 13th Pakistan’s parliament blamed India for the violence; a day later India’s parliament snarled back.






In India the jingoistic media have fanned outrage. Some 42 soldiers have already died in Kashmir this year, compared with 17 in 2012. Talking to Pakistan, the nationalists say, would amount to appeasement. A group of self-styled “experts” has petitioned the prime minister, Manmohan Singh, to scrap a planned meeting with Mr Sharif in New York next month.

That would be a mistake. Renewed violence only makes it more urgent for the leaders to talk and to sideline extremists. Although his advisers have suggested that now is not the moment to draw closer to India, Mr Sharif should spend political capital on the “new beginning” that he says he wants with his neighbour. After May’s election victory, he has the mandate.



Our interactive map demonstrates how the territorial claims of India, Pakistan and China would change the shape of South Asia

India’s prime minister also believes in talking, not fighting. Mr Singh was born in what became Pakistan after India’s bloody partition in 1947; he wants to leave office having eased the hatred between the estranged brothers. After three wars, spectacular terrorism and decades of wasteful military spending, both sides would gain. India’s broad strategic ambitions also demand peace. It wants to do more business with Central Asia, and to match China’s influence in the region. Both are good reasons for better relations with its western neighbour.
Sadly, militants tend to meet the prospect of talks with violence. Suicide-attackers with links to Pakistan may have been behind the bloody assault on India’s consulate in the Afghan city of Jalalabad on August 3rd. Some Indians say Pakistani infiltrators stirred up recent protests in Kashmir—though Muslims there have no lack of grievances against the authorities. Yet leaders with an eye on the long term must hold the line. A meeting in September is an essential step to building trust.

No more excuses

Mr Singh should reach out first, as leader of the bigger and more confident power. As a start, he can offer to pipe gas or refined oil over the border, or to extend the Indian electricity grid to his energy-starved neighbour. Boosting trade by promoting investment, scrapping non-tariff trade barriers and ending the harassment of Pakistani visitors makes sense. Restating that India has no grand designs in Afghanistan is cost-free, too.

Mr Sharif has the bigger challenge, yet he has no excuse for delays in normalising trade ties. Crucially, he must also overcome his reluctance to confront dangerous Islamist groups at home, notably Lashkar-e-Taiba, which routinely threaten India. Hafiz Saeed, a militant leader, lives freely in Pakistan despite being named by both India and America as being behind the bloody attacks in Mumbai in 2008 that killed over 170 people. If he rejects such militants and meets Mr Singh, Mr Sharif will be on the way to becoming a peacemaker

India and Pakistan: Hold the line | The Economist
 
we should send her these pro indians to india. let them enjoy there with peace loving indians. i dont why in our country we have many women who loves india alot may be they are interested in bollywood.

Well take them if you are willing to take pakistani flag bearers in the valey, but wait then who will run omar abdullah's campaign
 
Back
Top Bottom