What's new

Three Atomic Clocks Have Failed Onboard India’s ‘Regional GPS’ Constellation

INDIAPOSITIVE

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Sep 20, 2014
Messages
9,318
Reaction score
-28
Country
India
Location
India
SOURCE: THE WIRE

sat6.jpg


Three atomic clocks onboard one of the satellites of the Indian Regional Navigation Satellite System (IRNSS) have failed, as ISRO chairman A.S. Kiran Kumar told The Hindu. The IRNSS is India’s version of the US’s globally used GPS system, and covers a wide swath of Asia and the Indian Ocean. It is a constellation of seven satellites in a geosynchronous orbit around Earth, and they coordinate to provide centimetre-level tracking precision to the Indian armed forces.

The three atomic clocks used onboard each satellite of the IRNSS are used for precise coordination and to well-account for the effects of general relativity.

With the failure of all three clocks – one primary and two backups – onboard IRNSS 1A, Kumar has said a replacement satellite, 1H, will be launched in the second half of 2017. It is unclear what caused the failure, although the issue is neither new nor likely to be unique. Earlier this month, the European Space Agency (ESA) reported that three rubidium atomic clocks and six hydrogen maser clocks onboard its counterpart of the IRNSS, called Galileo, had failed. Neither ESA nor ISRO have declared their respective constellations ineffective as a result. The IRNSS should be back to normal with the launch of 1H while the Galileo is still not at full strength: only 18 of 30 satellites are currently online. Moreover, a seventh hydrogen maser clock that failed has managed to restart itself.

In the same vein, ISRO is also attempting to restart its clocks. Until such time, Kumar said the constellation will continue to work normally while the 1A provides fuzzy, imprecise measurements.

All the rubidium atomic clocks onboard IRNSS and Galileo – as well as China’s Compass navigational constellation – were manufactured by the Swiss company Spectracom, purported to be a market leader. While China’s space programme has been typically closed off to foreign media, ESA and ISRO have yet to clarify whether the fault lies with Spectracom’s design or with something about current conditions in space. It is pertinent at this point to note that two atomic clocks on two Galileo satellites had already begun to fail in March and July, 2016.

Rubidium atomic clocks, though less accurate at measuring the passage of time than are hydrogen maser clocks, are still quite accurate, relatively cheap and widely used. They neither gain nor lose a second in tens of millions of years. They measure time according to the frequency of microwave emissions by electrons in a cooled rubidium atom, called the rubidium standard. When the atoms are of the element caesium instead, the resulting clock is also referred to as a primary frequency standard given its use in defining the standard times of many countries. Our own Indian Standard Time is ‘kept’ by caesium atomic clocks in Delhi’s National Physical Laboratory.


https://thewire.in/103934/atomic-clock-rubidium-irnss/
 
:rofl: Beidou 1, yes, but unlike you, all atomic clocks on Beidou 2 is indigenous built by China
 
All the rubidium atomic clocks onboard IRNSS and Galileo – as well as China’s Compass navigational constellation – were manufactured by the Swiss company Spectracom

Why u are so stupid? Read it yourself

http://izao.cc/article/499833107.html

Institute 203 got national award

As the only one at the same time the development of hydrogen, rubidium, cesium three atomic clock unit, two homes 203 has been the Beidou II satellite navigation system has delivered 13 batches of 26 on-board rubidium clock, and created all batches of zero fault Running record. With the successful launch of the atomic clock again and again, marking China has fully mastered the development of satellite-borne atomic clock technology, completely out of the shackles of foreign navigation technology, but also marks China has become the United States, Russia, after the establishment of autonomous navigation positioning system s country.
 
Why u are so stupid? Read it yourself

http://izao.cc/article/499833107.html

Institute 203 got national award

As the only one at the same time the development of hydrogen, rubidium, cesium three atomic clock unit, two homes 203 has been the Beidou II satellite navigation system has delivered 13 batches of 26 on-board rubidium clock, and created all batches of zero fault Running record. With the successful launch of the atomic clock again and again, marking China has fully mastered the development of satellite-borne atomic clock technology, completely out of the shackles of foreign navigation technology, but also marks China has become the United States, Russia, after the establishment of autonomous navigation positioning system s country.
an article written in chinese ! any way i was just quoting the OP. take it or leave it.
 
an article written in chinese ! any way i was just quoting the OP. take it or leave it.

Yeah, in your Indian crooked logic, if written in Chinese 1 plus 1 equals 3, only written in master language English it equals 2

So our most prestigious national science award in 2016, according to you, was awarded to a fake?

http://news.sciencenet.cn/htmlnews/2017/1/366025.shtm

And your bullshit excuse is so lame, you quoted and replied to me, but when I refuted you with direct link open information, you start to say I am quoting OP
 
ATOMIC CLOCKS

One of China's biggest coups was gaining access to atomic clocks, a key technology Beijing needed for accurate satellite navigation, according to aerospace experts and the leaked U.S. diplomatic cables.

China failed in attempts to buy these clocks from EADS, according to the leaked diplomatic cables. However, between 2003 and 2007, China bought up to 20 rubidium atomic clocks from the high-precision Swiss instrument maker Temex Time, now known as SpectraTime, according to industry experts and the diplomatic cables.
Articles in Chinese technical journals suggest the Swiss clocks have been fitted to Beidou satellites.

https://www.google.co.in/amp/mobile...USL4N0JJ0J320131222?client=ms-android-samsung

so the swiss built the beating heart of Indian GPS , The atomic clock. Yet indians call it indigenous?
Epic Fail.
China's beidou satellite uses the same Swiss atomic clocks.
https://www.google.co.in/amp/mobile...USL4N0JJ0J320131222?client=ms-android-samsung

So does ESA Galileo satellites.
 

So? Didn't I say Beidou 1 use Swiss clocks? Which part you Indians don't understand, that Beidou 2 clocks are indigenous built and got top award in 2016

Yeah, I know, you believe reuters, in the link you gave it says
http://www.reuters.com/article/breakout-beidou-idUSL4N0JJ0J320131222

Chinese companies now appear to have mastered the technology to build these clocks

now satisfied?
 
Last edited:
So? Didn't I say Beidou 1 use Swiss clocks? Which part you Indians don't understand?
Fail.
L
So? Didn't I say Beidou 1 use Swiss clocks? Which part you Indians don't understand?
Last sat of Beidou 1 was launched in 2003.
Where as the report clearly mentions China purchased the atomic clocks between 2003-07.
 
Yeah, in your Indian crooked logic, if written in Chinese 1 plus 1 equals 3, only written in master language English it equals 2

So our most prestigious national science award in 2016, according to you, was awarded to a fake?

http://news.sciencenet.cn/htmlnews/2017/1/366025.shtm

And your bullshit excuse is so lame, you quoted and replied to me, but when I refuted you with direct link open information, you start to say I am quoting OP
we all are AWARE OF credibility of CCP mouthpieces ! A country where even twitter is ban !
 
Yeah, in your Indian crooked logic, if written in Chinese 1 plus 1 equals 3, only written in master language English it equals 2

So our most prestigious national science award in 2016, according to you, was awarded to a fake?

http://news.sciencenet.cn/htmlnews/2017/1/366025.shtm

And your bullshit excuse is so lame, you quoted and replied to me, but when I refuted you with direct link open information, you start to say I am quoting OP
have u bothered to read OP. the line i wrote were from the OP article.
 

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom