Jamaat is predisposed towards tacitly supporting extremist elements and "non-state actors" working in concert with Islamic terror modules- whether domestic or international.
It is not a matter of what BD has done or can do or may do or could attempt to do. No one has posited any argument against BD's right to act in its interests either. We are simply doing what we see fit and so are you. We have found high levels of intransigence on many issues and have thus taken appropriate steps, BD is free to do the same. Take for example the Felani case, her death albeit tragic does not change that fact that she was engaged in illegally crossing the international border, India has made it known time and time again that such illegals are not welcome and shall be dealt with up to the point of being met with lethal force and yet the situation continues to remain the same- all the political factions in BD are apathetic towards the situation. As such, as I stated before, we have taken appropriate action where and when we have seen fit to do so and where and when it has been within our means. We shall continue to do the same as it is within our best interests regardless of the fact that it is a cause for great consternation and furor among the BD populace. Transit has been an issue and ergo we have undertaken the Kaladan multi-modal transit project to render the need for direct over land transit through BD non-essential, despite certain teething issues related with said venture, within a period of little more than a decade. As I have already stated, the relationship between the two nations shall be based on quid pro quo, absent that we at least will act and have acted unilaterally- BD is always free to do the same.
Forget about JI if it is extremist Islamist or not, which is the concern of Bangladeshis at first, and the most importantly, it's a democratic party, unlike Talibans, that it shall not do any thing undemocratic without the mandate of the majority; and so far you have failed to say
how JI has wreaked India in any way. I know the reason exactly why you cannot make a single point that says India is harmed by JI in any way. Because, if you point out any thing like that, your claim of
quid pro quo from the side of India would seem invalid. For example, you wanted Transit, okay fine, but without commensurate payment that BD deserves. And since AL is an ally of India and deceitful to BD, it does not mind if BD does not get proportional benefit from the transit deal. On the other hand, Jamat being a pro-BD and educated political party, opposes the imbalanced transit deal with India and also other uneven/unfair deals. Therefore, as JI does not bow to India's illegitimate and unfair offers, you call them extremist,
but you do not say that JI is your hurdles to achieve your unfair deals. So you have taken a preemptive action to label JI as extremist so that they get rejected by the Bangladeshi first, and your unfair jobs get done easily with the help of BAL. Otherwise, how a little party is a threat to mighty country India!
And I have no problem if you kill Bangladeshis while cross your border illegally. I will not blame you and I will not bring the issue of humanity here that India will not understand.
