The U.S. just sent a carrier strike group to confront China

[Tiqiu]

Actually your Chinese Gov does... go and read about the Chinese Warnings to India and its objection to India cooperation with US in SCS

The warning just severs as a pretext for next step if you Indians proceed, so far China has refused to deploy navy ships to Gwadar port as asked. The Chinese have many ways to make you Indian very uncomfortable.

 

[Kyusuibu Honbu]

How is the question? Sanction will backfire. Fight is ruled out as it is near to chinese territory which will give a huge advantage.
US will simply sit and watch like they did for crimea. At the best they can provoke viets or filipinos to take a shot.

The question is will China risk a confrontation even if it has home ground advantage, given the fact USN can harass PLAN and Chinese merchant vessels anywhere else in retaliation.

 

[Tiqiu]

LoL... Pretext for the next step??? incase you didn't realize.. we've been doing it for many years now and now we don't even respect your Rules set illegally....

Feb 26 Chinese nuclear sub supporting ship docked at Colombo Port. You know what is underneath?

 

[$@rJen]

Feb 26 Chinese nuclear sub supporting ship docked at Colombo Port. You know what is underneath?

LoL... stop posting BS.. no Subs docked in Lanka recenly... only during the last Naval exercise chinese ship was there along with Indian ships and carrier

 

[Guynextdoor2]

So how come China seized the Scarborough shoal from the Philippines in 2012 and America never came to fight, despite having a mutual defence treaty with the Philippines for half a century? Instead they chose to abandon their mutual defence treaty.

How come China is still building and militarizing islands in the South China Sea today, completely ignoring America's red lines there?

Obviously we do not believe America wants to swap their expensive carriers with thousands of personnel on board for our mass produced carrier killer ballistic missiles.

If we are wrong... then let them come and fire the first shot. Otherwise we will continue as usual.

Our island building is still going ahead at full steam as we speak. Nothing short of a full-scale nuclear war is going to stop it. Certainly not a few sunk carriers.

Taking great pride in stupidity is not a virtue. You think the US could not build islands of it's own? There is a reason why the rest of the world observes restaraint. You're acting like a spoilt child.

 

[Tiqiu]

no Subs docked in Lanka recenly

With sub supporting ship, the big fish doesn't need to dock any where. You should consider adding some protein in your diet to be able to think.

 

[$@rJen]

With sub supporting ship, the big fish doesn't need to dock any where. You should consider adding some protein in your diet to be able to think.

you should stop being so dumb in the first place... go back and read what you quoted me.

""Feb 26 Chinese nuclear sub supporting ship docked at Colombo Port. ""......

So anyway.. were you talking about Docking subs why all of sudden you're taking a u-turn.. now you're saying it doesn't need to dock.. then why in the first place it was supporting the surface vessels???? adnwer me kid.... better back it up with a Link

 

[Chinese-Dragon]

Taking great pride in stupidity is not a virtue. You think the US could not build islands of it's own? There is a reason why the rest of the world observes restaraint. You're acting like a spoilt child.

Restraint? Didn't America invade 3 countries in the past decade alone over BS like Saddam's WMD?

It suddenly becomes "restraint" when the other side can hit back.

 

[Tiqiu]

""Feb 26 Chinese nuclear sub supporting ship docked at Colombo Port. "

sub supporting ship=865, not docking sub(093), got it?

 

[Guynextdoor2]

Restraint? Didn't America invade 3 countries in the past decade alone over BS like Saddam's WMD?

It suddenly becomes "restraint" when the other side can hit back.

and the problem for CHina is that IT DIDN"T DO IT? Supporting tinpot countries with the most heinous rights records is what china seems to be good at doing. And yes, this is a major escalation because it sets a dangerous precedent the world had better avoid. ANd before you feel all warm and fuzzy about what you're doing....THIS TOO IS STUFF THAT THE US and THE RUSSAINS COULD HAVE DONE DECADES AGO.

 

[$@rJen]

sub supporting ship=865, not docking sub(093), got it?

LoL... this is called source??? lol... a Nuclear sub was supporting surface vessels to lanka but it was unable/not allowed to dock... Sounds like a Sad story for me

 

[Kyle Sun]

do not worry about that
Uncle Sam has enough money to waste.

 

[Speeder 2]

Seriously though, America should have made their move 10 years ago.

Now we have a massive arsenal of carrier killer ballistic missiles, namely the DF-21D and the DF-26, the latter of which has a range of around 4000 km. And according to the US department of defense: "Can destroy an aircraft carrier with a single warhead... and there is no system that is currently able to intercept it".

We have already built large numbers of these (which have been operational for many years now).

Now will America be willing to trade their extremely expensive aircraft carriers with hundreds of planes and thousands of personnel on board, for our mass produced carrier killer ballistic missiles? Even if it takes hundreds of these missiles to take out a carrier we still come out massively ahead.

And, worse news is coming. China has already tested HGV technology multiple times already. It's only a matter of time before it gets inducted (which will boost the capabilities of our DF-26 by astronomical amounts), the longer America waits the lower their chances become. That's why the sooner the better, maybe Trump will understand that.

The sooner America makes a move the better their chances. Trump 2016.

(Of course we don't believe they will make a move, which is why China seized the Scarborough shoal as far back as 2012, and is currently continuing to build islands in the SCS).

Actually China doesn't have to use DF 21 D and DF 26in SCS.

China's world-leading long-distance precision rocket artilleries "Guardian" family series may be better suited to get the job done to overwelme the carriers, moving or not, with abundently cheap satuation attacks.

I say "Guadian" artillery rockets, HQ9, HQ16, for each islands!

 

[TheTruth]

Supporting tinpot countries with the most heinous rights records is what china seems to be good at doing.

I haven't heard that China is supporting India.

 

[Tiqiu]

So finally... you ca't back your claims???? its so sad to see the failure of chinese chest thumping kid

What claims? I told you many times the sub supporting ship was docked and the big fish was beneath the water in the Ocean. Man you do need to consider adding some meat to your grass diet.