What's new

The U.S. Isn’t Ready to Face China on the Battlefield, The invasion of Ukraine exacerbates critical deficiencies in America’s defense industrial base

.
US navy's air wing is far more powerful than PLA airforce. There is hardly any comparison. Chinese airforce stands behind US Airforce, US navy Air wing, Russian airforce and Indian airforce as per the air power ranking.
Lol, of course, China is always behind India in everything.
 
.
For example. You have 100 people in Australia, 20 of them are convict, 80 of them are not, that 20 married to either fellow convict or guards and have another 20 kids and the other 80 people married within themselves and have 80 kids the next year (The one that's married convict already counted in the convict population) you would now have 160 non-convict descendent, and 40 convict descendent, and total 200 population. What is the percentage of the convict in Australia after 1 year?
Let me teach you a simple question about high school probability.
F1:
Non-criminal ratio, 80%
F2:
Proportion of non-criminal ancestors: 80%×80%=64%
Proportion of criminal ancestors: 1-64%=36%
F3:
Proportion of non-criminal ancestors: 64%×64%=41%
Proportion of criminal ancestors: 1-41%=59%
F4
Proportion of non-criminal ancestors: 41%×41%=17%
Proportion of criminal ancestors: 1-17%=83%
F5
Proportion of non-criminal ancestors: 17%×17%=3%
Proportion of criminal ancestors: 1-3%=97%
F6
Proportion of non-criminal ancestors: 3%×3%=0.09%
Proportion of criminal ancestors: 1-0.09%=99.91%

Didn't you graduate high school? what a fool!
 
.
Let me teach you a simple question about high school probability.
F1:
Non-criminal ratio, 80%
F2:
Proportion of non-criminal ancestors: 80%×80%=64%
Proportion of criminal ancestors: 1-64%=36%
F3:
Proportion of non-criminal ancestors: 64%×64%=41%
Proportion of criminal ancestors: 1-41%=59%
F4
Proportion of non-criminal ancestors: 41%×41%=17%
Proportion of criminal ancestors: 1-17%=83%
F5
Proportion of non-criminal ancestors: 17%×17%=3%
Proportion of criminal ancestors: 1-3%=97%
F6
Proportion of non-criminal ancestors: 3%×3%=0.09%
Proportion of criminal ancestors: 1-0.09%=99.91%

Didn't you graduate high school? what a fool!
Yeah, its time to give stupid fool a proper lesson lest too dumb to understand.
 
.
Let me teach you a simple question about high school probability.
F1:
Non-criminal ratio, 80%
F2:
Proportion of non-criminal ancestors: 80%×80%=64%
Proportion of criminal ancestors: 1-64%=36%
F3:
Proportion of non-criminal ancestors: 64%×64%=41%
Proportion of criminal ancestors: 1-41%=59%
F4
Proportion of non-criminal ancestors: 41%×41%=17%
Proportion of criminal ancestors: 1-17%=83%
F5
Proportion of non-criminal ancestors: 17%×17%=3%
Proportion of criminal ancestors: 1-3%=97%
F6
Proportion of non-criminal ancestors: 3%×3%=0.09%
Proportion of criminal ancestors: 1-0.09%=99.91%

Didn't you graduate high school? what a fool!
You are talking about the "Probability" of a single person would be descendent of convict. A la what is the probability of the person I met is going to be a direct descendant of convict. What you are saying will NOT make sense and cannot be used to be the real case because.

1.) You are assuming convict and non-convict to be of 1 to 1, so 1 convict give birth to 1 child and 1 non-Convict give birth to 1 child. That will NOT be the case if that ratio is NOT 1 to 1. i.e. The more children either group has, that titled the probability on that side because you can have more than 1 children per family.

2.) You basically discounted ALL migrant; those are not descendant of Convict and can never be because they mostly are not British. A la, what if the person I met next is from France or Germany or US or China? The probability of them being descendant of Convict is 0.

I am talking about the population percentage of a direct descendant. That's the population representation.

Dude, read what people type before trying to lecture others.....LOL :lol: :lol: You did not ask whether or not I am a descendant of Convict, you ask whether or not my ancestors were convict.

your criminal ancestors?

This forum needs a facepalm emoji....[Insert Facepalm Emoji]

Also if we go by your "Logic" then Everyone in China is a descendant from Opioid Addict lol So your original post is wrong

I don't know if my ancestors were drug addicts, but I know your ancestors were criminals, and you're proud of your ancestors being criminals
F1:
Non-drug addict ratio, 80%
F2:
Proportion of Non-drug addict ancestors: 80%×80%=64%
Proportion of drug addict ancestors: 1-64%=36%
F3:
Proportion of Non-drug addict ancestors: 64%×64%=41%
Proportion of drug addict ancestors: 1-41%=59%
F4
Proportion of Non-drug addict ancestors: 41%×41%=17%
Proportion of drug addict ancestors: 1-17%=83%
F5
Proportion of Non-drug addict ancestors: 17%×17%=3%
Proportion of drug addict ancestors: 1-3%=97%
F6
Proportion of Non-drug addict ancestors: 3%×3%=0.09%
Proportion of drug addict ancestors: 1-0.09%=99.91%

Didn't you graduate high school? Yes, that's a good question, you need to graduate from one before you can ask others....
 
Last edited:
. .
Wait for it and those dudes will claim that Australia was "discovered" by China back in the day.

some dude just say everyone in Australia is descendant from Convict....So, that may not be far off.

Which is sad, because those people who were actually descendant from the convict ship used to think that is big deal, then they go on to Ancestry.com and look it up and see what they did to get sent to Australia. Now this Chinese dude said everyone are.lol

And somebody need to tell National Library of Australia that according to some Chinese dude, everyone''s ancestor is a convict, there are no need to have a page helping people to search their convict past. :enjoy:

 
. .
probably his visa application downunder was rejected. I figured he doesn't have the "balls" to court a white girl.
I probably would too if I were a girl......

These type of people gives me the creep...
 
.
1666154246405.png

You should have went for Canadian citizenship. It was and still is very easy to get and you could have got it in 3-5 yrs.
Uhhhmn @jhungary what do you think pal? Let's move to Canada?
 
. .
. . . .

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom