What's new

The state that wouldn't fail

Status
Not open for further replies.
One aspect that the members of the forum seem to have ignored till now is the role played by the United States in saving Pakistan from becoming a failed state. The American contribution is just being ignored, very conveniently. Lets remember that had it not been for the American pressure the Pakistan Army would have never gone after the Taliban in SWAT, having tasted stiff resistance in their first attempt to clear the area of the Taliban.
 
One aspect that the members of the forum seem to have ignored till now is the role played by the United States in saving Pakistan from becoming a failed state. The American contribution is just being ignored, very conveniently. Lets remember that had it not been for the American pressure the Pakistan Army would have never gone after the Taliban in SWAT, having tasted stiff resistance in their first attempt to clear the area of the Taliban.
I think you are giving 'American pressure' undue credit. While American prodding has always been there, and the American's wanted Pakistan to act a lot earlier than it did.

The fact that the GoP waited to try every single non-military option it had, especially the last peace deal that involved implementing the Nizam-e-adl, to me indicates that GoP and military continued to keep and independent mind on the issue regardless of US pressure.

It was after the Swat deal failed, Taliban atrocities came to light (for the public outside of Swat), they started expanding towards some strategic locations, and public opinion started to shift, that the GoP and GoNWFP decided that it was time to start.

I'll maintain that the major constraining factor in the GoP's military efforts against the Taliban has been strong public opposition to military action, and the shift came about not primarily because of American pressure, but because the political and military leadership were satisfied that all possible non-military options had been exhausted, and public support for military options began to increase.
 
One aspect that the members of the forum seem to have ignored till now is the role played by the United States in saving Pakistan from becoming a failed state. The American contribution is just being ignored, very conveniently. Lets remember that had it not been for the American pressure the Pakistan Army would have never gone after the Taliban in SWAT, having tasted stiff resistance in their first attempt to clear the area of the Taliban.

Pakistan is nuke state ,American tunes are now different with us.They are smart fellows know very well how to deal with Pakistan.
PA and GOP has taken right decisions at right time .Now whole nation is standing behind Army and Government.
 
This is a long war

Tuesday, June 16, 2009
Raza Rumi

This is a critical moment in our history perhaps unmatched for its severity and its brutal reality. The experiential nightmare that our country is passing through is perhaps unparalleled for the enemy is neither foreign nor fully identifiable. At the same time, never has there been a clear backing of a military campaign against domestic agents of subversion and anarchy. Forget the doctored samples of opinion polls, often conducted by foreign agencies. That by itself should make us ashamed for our proclivity to accept what others have to analyse and determine for us. Even ignore the fringe voices of dissent led by those who neither have credibility or sagacity to comprehend the existential crisis faced by Pakistan. The army has shown vision and displayed courage in tackling a menace that alas is a home-grown cancer due to our short-sighted strategies in pursuit of phantom depths. The battle to be won is now the country itself.

The political consensus of sorts that has accompanied the military action against the Taliban is also remarkable. Notwithstanding the spin doctors posing as analyst-anchors on the idiot box, the political class has recognised that its survival is embedded in the battle against extremism that predicates itself on elimination of sane, moderate and secular politics itself. This was the Swat model – blow the polity to bits and create a vacuum for a takeover. An age-old recipe employed by the hordes from Central Asia that invaded Muslim Delhi again and again during Sultanate and Mughal periods of our common histories which refuse to be partitioned.

Now, the brutal assassination of Mufti Naeemi in Lahore is nothing but a clear message of how a minority school of thought within Sharia-mongers wants to impose its version of politics, religion and culture on this diverse and vibrant country. The danger, after the relentless use of violence by the forces of darkness, is that the public opinion that swung against the Taliban after Swat brutalities and the political consensus that emerged around that, might be cracked. After all, military resolve has not taken place in isolation nor under foreign pressure only. The international pressure on Pakistan has remained unabated since 9/11 and has intensified with each passing year. But it was only when we faced the spectre of annihilation as a society and polity that we have decided to wage a war.

The military operation is just the beginning. It is going to be a war, if the consensus is further deepened and nurtured, for the next few years given the way it is spilling into big cities, engulfing sectarian and ethnic tensions germane to Pakistan's society. It has to be fought not just militarily either. It has to be waged within the media, within the education system and above all with a credible ideological alternative to suicidal anti-Americanism and vague notions of tribal justice founded on misogyny.

The challenges are immense but not insurmountable. And, historic opportunities exist for reversal of three decades of adventurism we, as a state, followed by fanning the worst of hatreds, pernicious ideologies that the vast majority of the country does not relate to. Rural Pakistan is intrinsically secular. The working classes in the rural environs of Punjab and Sindh cannot afford to accept Islamism that excludes women from the livelihood arrangements. The Baloch have always been secular in their orientation despite problematic elements of their tribal codes. The Pakhtun culture is another story: its narratives are viewed through the eyes of colonial historians and commentators. The essential cultural metaphor of scepticism about the mullah in Pakhtun folklore and poetry has been grossly underreported and distorted. The fit between tribal codes and Taliban Islam is also a misnomer. This is why in a fair election, ordinary Pakistanis despite their deep love for their faith refuse to vote for self-styled Islamist agendas.

But the misleading currents of analyses that this is an American war, and somehow the Taliban have public support in pockets of Pakistan, are inherently dangerous propaganda tools deliberately cultivated to suit certain interests. The refugees in NWFP camps tell a different story: of harrowing harassment, violence, disruption and crime. There is neither a political ideology nor any moral basis in the operations of those who are touted as anti-imperial harbingers of justice and equality.

The government must now embark on five major missions. First, a massive public campaign – within and outside the confines of the media – to sustain the momentum of this war and its complexity ought to be launched.

Second, effective and quick reconstruction of the war-affected areas should be achieved preferably outside the government ambit as the existing red-tapism will only bolster the myth of Taliban quick fix.

Third, a government of national unity ought to be in charge of this war and the recent divisive party-politics needs to be packed and trashed if the political elites want to survive.

Fourth, the madressah reform programme that could not be implemented by a military regime needs to be implemented with the involvement of Deobandi leaders and Barelvi schools that are now patently mobilised against the Taliban version of Islam.

Finally, the abandoned police reforms of 2002 need to be pulled out of the cabinets of expediency and reviewed on an emergency basis. With the current abysmal levels of police operations, we will not be able to complement or win the military operations.

Pakistan has survived many rough patches. It is not an ordinary country that will dissipate nor will it be a walkover. Provided its state reinvents itself and traditional politics of opportunism is replaced by a people-oriented vision, and a programme of redistributive justice. A tall order indeed but is there any other option?

The writer is a development professional and a writer based in Lahore.
 
‘Evaluating the orders’

By Kamran Shafi
Tuesday, 16 Jun, 2009

Governor NWFP, Owais Ghani, on Sunday, June 14, 2009: ‘The government has decided to launch an operation against militants in Fata.

‘It has been decided that a comprehensive and decisive operation will be launched to eliminate Baitullah Mehsud and dismantle his network … we have repeatedly warned the Mehsud tribe through tribal elders to give up their miscreant activities and advised them not to shelter foreign militants. The government will not tolerate any act against the security of the people’s lives and property at any cost.


‘They kept on their miscreant activities and continued to harbour terrorists. As a result, many people have lost their lives in suicide attacks in Lahore, Peshawar, Islamabad and today in Dera Ismail Khan.’

Dawn reported, ‘Governor Ghani said the army had been ordered to launch a crackdown on militants in the Federally Administered Tribal Areas.’

Army spokesman Maj-Gen Athar Abbas on Sunday, June 14, 2009 to the news agency Associated Press: ‘The government has made the announcement. We will give a comment after evaluating the orders’ — reported in all the main newspapers of the country.

Are we, the hapless people of Pakistan, right, then, to be confused, rattled, scared out of our wits, petrified, perplexed and baffled by what is going on? How possibly can the spokesman of an agency of state, the army, say that it will ‘give a comment after evaluating’ the direct orders of the Government of Pakistan through its agent in the Frontier, the governor himself? What ‘comments’ will the army give, please?

Were we always right when we thought that the army and the elected government are at odds over how to ‘handle’ the murderous Yahoos? Were we right in thinking that there are wheels within independently-powered wheels within the security establishment, some propelling the Pakistani state forwards and some forcing it backwards? Are there still powerful interests within the army/what is increasingly referred to as the ‘elite agency’ aka the Mother of All Agencies that, even now, consider some of the Yahoos their ‘strategic assets’?

Well, the double whammy of the release of the Red Mosque prayer leader Maulana Abdul Aziz whose cohorts brought so much misery to Islamabad the Beautiful, and of Hafiz Muhammad Saeed of the Falah-i-Insaniyat formerly the Jamaatud Daawa née the Lashkar-i-Taiba (whose antics have brought such a lot of opprobrium on to our country) because of lackadaisical prosecution by government prosecutors certainly points to that.

Be which as it may, what the elected Government of Pakistan gets by buckling to pressure from the security establishment escapes me, specially when it will all redound to the ‘bloody civilians’ own utter detriment. Could one, then, take this opportunity to once again implore President Zardari to ignore the bad advice he has been getting from his various hangers-on and dogsbodies and flunkies, those who have put him in one tight spot after another? He must remove all the stops in repealing the dictatorial aspects of the 17th Amendment; and implement the Charter of Democracy immediately.

Only this will block the way for future army interventions: is it too much to say that the political forces must come together at the earliest to deflate the hot-air balloons even now being floated by some of the tight buddies of the establishment who are advocating an early return to army rule because of the most outlandish conspiracies that only they can see?

The conspiracies range from an American plot to push more Taliban into Pakistan so as to tie up the army in Fata while they ‘take out’ our nuclear weapons and missiles, and thence to break up Pakistan. Here is one published in a daily on May 28, 2009, verbatim: ‘Once Pakistan is de-nuclearised the USA would encourage Pakistan’s Balkanisation into a Baloch US satellite, a city state of MQM in Karachi, a Pakhtunistan badly bombed and in tatters and a Punjab stripped of nuclear potential, kicked and bullied by India. A Northern Area republic which is a US lackey unless China decides to call the US bluff by occupying the Northern Area.

‘What is the answer to this: an immediate clean break with USA/Nato and closing all Nato/US supply lines to Afghanistan; mining and barbed wiring the Afghan Pakistan border; allowing the Fata agencies to import goods for Afghanistan duty free and scrapping the old Afghan Transit Trade Accord thus economically boosting the Fata. A military alliance with China with a Chinese naval base at Gwadar; rapprochement with Russia and offering the Russians free port facilities at Gwadar; creation of a maritime province in Gwadar and Lasbela districts insulating these areas from the Baloch sardars on payroll of US intelligence; creation of a Pashtun province in the Pashtun districts of Balochistan with Quetta as its capital.’


I ask you.

These brilliant thoughts end thus: ‘Everything is not inevitable in history. The ablest navigators can defeat the worst sea storms. Pakistan needs strategic and political vision. It may be necessary to have a military government to do all this in case the civilians prove inept.’

Now does the People’s Party see what madness is out there? Now will it get its act together? Now do the people at large, my hapless and helpless countrymen and women, realise the complete craziness that is out there? Now is it clear that we must stand shoulder to shoulder and say with one voice, good, bad, or ugly, we stand by democracy and our democratically elected leaders?

Let me end by alluding to another thought now making waves on the Internet. And that is the impossibility of the Yahoos taking over Islamabad the Beautiful when Pakistan has the seventh largest army in the whole wide world. Whilst some would argue that the seventh largest army in the world has Pakistan and not the other way around, what does it take for murderous Yahoos to ‘take over’ any place and its people?

Remember Swat, seventh largest army and all? All it took was three slaughtered and headless bodies displayed upside down on electric poles every morn three days running. That is all. For ‘Khooni (Bloody) Chowk,’ Mingora, Swat; read F-7 Markaz, Islamabad the Beautiful.

There is no reason at all to be sanguine — we are well and truly up the proverbial creek.
 
I think the Government of Pakistan is working hard to get rid of the terrorists before Pakistan's 62nd independence day and I'm confident that we will be successful in defeating the terrorists.
 
Army spokesman Maj-Gen Athar Abbas on Sunday, June 14, 2009 to the news agency Associated Press: ‘The government has made the announcement. We will give a comment after evaluating the orders’ — reported in all the main newspapers of the country.

Are we, the hapless people of Pakistan, right, then, to be confused, rattled, scared out of our wits, petrified, perplexed and baffled by what is going on? How possibly can the spokesman of an agency of state, the army, say that it will ‘give a comment after evaluating’ the direct orders of the Government of Pakistan through its agent in the Frontier, the governor himself? What ‘comments’ will the army give, please?

Kamran Shafi is ranting here - what did he expect the ISPR to say? 'Oh yes, we'll start bombing Monday?'

Making a mountain out of a molehill quite frankly, and speculating wildly.
 
I think you are giving 'American pressure' undue credit. While American prodding has always been there, and the American's wanted Pakistan to act a lot earlier than it did.

The fact that the GoP waited to try every single non-military option it had, especially the last peace deal that involved implementing the Nizam-e-adl, to me indicates that GoP and military continued to keep and independent mind on the issue regardless of US pressure.

It was after the Swat deal failed, Taliban atrocities came to light (for the public outside of Swat), they started expanding towards some strategic locations, and public opinion started to shift, that the GoP and GoNWFP decided that it was time to start.

I'll maintain that the major constraining factor in the GoP's military efforts against the Taliban has been strong public opposition to military action, and the shift came about not primarily because of American pressure, but because the political and military leadership were satisfied that all possible non-military options had been exhausted, and public support for military options began to increase.

So you mean to say that the Americans deserve no credit at all in helping Pakistan fight the battle for its survival?
 
So you mean to say that the Americans deserve no credit at all in helping Pakistan fight the battle for its survival?

They get credit for providing some equipment and resources, and especially for being the leading nation in terms of contributions for taking care of the IDP's. They may also have a role in providing assurances in terms of keeping the Eastern front calm.

I do not necessarily see much role for them beyond that in the decision by Pakistan to launch the military operation against the Taliban in Malakand division, because the major constraints on that count were primarily domestic - lack of public support and the failure of the NAR peace deal, through which the GoP gave as much to the militants as Pakistan possibly could without completely abdicating its sovereignty.
 
They get credit for providing some equipment and resources, and especially for being the leading nation in terms of contributions for taking care of the IDP's. They may also have a role in providing assurances in terms of keeping the Eastern front calm.

I do not necessarily see much role for them beyond that in the decision by Pakistan to launch the military operation against the Taliban in Malakand division, because the major constraints on that count were primarily domestic - lack of public support and the failure of the NAR peace deal, through which the GoP gave as much to the militants as Pakistan possibly could without completely abdicating its sovereignty.


That's interesting to note. Winning hearts and minds is just not working here. If a guy staying in the United States is not happy with the contribution of the Americans in Pakistan i can imagine the mood in the streets of Pakistan. Billions of dollars gone down the drain ha!! Doesn't argue too well for the American policy in relation to Pakistan in the long run. Makes one wonder as to what the future holds.
 
Wheels within wheels

Dawn Editorial
Friday, 19 Jun, 2009

SOW the wind and reap the whirlwind. The full ramifications of the dangerous game played by Pakistan’s security establishment over the past few decades are now being felt where they hurt the most: at home, on our own turf. Misguided policies of strategic depth in Afghanistan created a cadre of highly trained and motivated militants who are now beyond the control of their original keepers. Perhaps equally disastrously, Pakistan’s policy of turning more than a blind eye to sectarian and ‘jihadi’ outfits that looked eastward rather than across the Durand Line produced a breed of fighters that has now been deprived of a cause. Their guns, as we speak, are trained inwards and terrorism within the borders of Pakistan is the curse of the day. The ‘jihadis’ of the 1990s are today’s terrorists, harbouring a serious grudge against a state that seemingly jettisoned them after joining the ‘enemy’ camp. What once came across as a symbiotic relationship turned adversarial soon after 9/11, possibly under duress. Our very own militants, it seems, have come home to roost.

The ‘Punjabi Taliban’ cannot really be linked to the Afghan war; their ideology has its roots elsewhere. These are people who were/are steeped in sectarian hatred and a passion for an armed approach to ‘resolving’ the Kashmir dispute. Yet, they now enjoy solid linkages with the Taliban who are engaged in a bitter war against the states of Pakistan and Afghanistan as well as Nato forces. The origins of the Lashkar-i-Jhangvi and the Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan have little in common, but that has not prevented these organisations from pooling resources in what has become a joint ‘struggle’ against the forces of democracy and modernity. The TTP’s Darra Adamkhel chief, whose ultimatum apparently forced the closure of Peshawar airport on Wednesday, was once a member of the Lashkar-i-Jhangvi. Also on Wednesday, the Punjab police paraded before the press one of the alleged perpetrators of the assault against the Sri Lankan cricket team in Lahore. In effecting his arrest, the law-enforcement agencies claimed to have cracked a ‘Punjabi Taliban’ network. The Taliban ‘movement’, clearly, is amorphous and its tentacles are spreading despite the state’s recent military gains. The arrest in Lahore could well be cited as an intel success if the case against the accused can be proved. But it also highlights the enormity of the task at hand, for there are wheels within wheels when it comes to tackling the Taliban.
 
Preventing a Taliban victory

By Pervez Hoodbhoy
Saturday, 20 Jun, 2009

NOW that the army has turned serious, Baitullah Mehsud cannot expect to stroll down Constitution Avenue any time soon, nor hope to sit in the presidency.

A few thousand mountain barbarians, even if trained by Al Qaeda’s best, cannot possibly seize power from a modern, well-armed state with 600,000 soldiers. The spectre of Pakistan collapsing in six months — a fear expressed by a senior US military adviser in March — has evaporated.

But there is little cause for elation. Daily terror attacks across the country give abundant proof that religious extremism has streamed down the mountains into the plains. Through abductions, beheadings and suicide bombings, Taliban insurgents are destabilising Pakistan, damaging its economy and spreading despondency.

Look at Islamabad, a city of fear. Machine-gun bunkers are ubiquitous while traffic barely trickles past concrete blocks placed across its super-wide roads. Upscale restaurants, fearing suicide bombers, have removed their signs although they still hope clients will remember. Who will be the next target? Girls’ schools, Internet cafes, bookshops, or western clothing stores with mannequins? Or perhaps shops selling toilet paper, underwear, and other un-Islamic goods?

The impact on Pakistan’s women is enormous. Throwing acid, or threatening to do so, has been spectacularly successful in making women embrace modesty. Today there is scarcely a female face visible anywhere in the Frontier province. Men are also changing dress — anxious private employers, government departments and NGOs have advised their male employees in Peshawar and other cities to wear shalwar-kameez rather than trousers. Video shops are being bombed out of business, and many barbers have put ‘no-shave’ notices outside their shops.

If public support were absent, extremist violence could be relatively easy to deal with. But extremism does not lie merely at the fringes. As an example, let us recall that 5,000 people crammed the streets outside Lal Masjid to pray behind the battle-hardened pro-Taliban militant leader, Maulana Abdul Aziz, the day after he was released from prison on the orders of interior minister Rehman Malik.

In the political arena, the extremists have high-profile cheerleaders like Imran Khan, Qazi Hussain Ahmad and Hamid Gul who rush to justify every attack on Pakistan’s people and culture. To them it makes no difference that Baitullah Mehsud proudly admits to the murder of Allama Dr Sarfaraz Ahmad Naeemi, the recent Peshawar mosque bombing, the earlier Wah slaughter and scores of other hideous suicide attacks. Like broken gramophone records, they chant “Amrika, Amrika, Amrika” after every new Taliban atrocity.

Nevertheless, bad as things are, there is a respite. To the relief of those who wish to see Pakistan survive, the army finally moved against the Taliban menace. But, while the state has committed men to battle, it cannot provide them a convincing reason why they must fight.

For now some soldiers have bought into the amazing invention that the Baitullahs and Fazlullahs are India’s secret agents. Others have been told that they are actually fighting a nefarious American-Jewish plot to destabilise Pakistan. To inspire revenge, still others are being shown the revolting Taliban-produced videos of Pakistani soldiers being tortured and beheaded.

That the enemy lacks an accurate name typifies the confusion and contradiction within. In official parlance they are called ‘militants’ or ‘extremists’ but never religious extremists. It is astonishing that the semi-literate Fazlullah, on whose head the government has now placed a price, is reverentially referred to as ‘maulana’. On the other hand there is no hesitation in describing Baloch fighters — who fight for a nationalist cause rather than a religious one — as rebels or terrorists.

A muddled nation can still fight, but not very well and not for too long. Self-deception enormously increases vulnerability. Yet, Pakistan’s current army and political leaders cannot alone be blamed for the confusion; history’s baggage is difficult to dispense with.

To say what really lies at the heart of Pakistan’s problems will require summoning more courage than presently exists. The unmentionable truth — one etched in stone — is that when a state proclaims to have a religious mission, it inevitably privileges those who organise religious life and interpret religious text. It then becomes difficult — perhaps impossible — to challenge those who claim to fight for religious causes. After all, what’s wrong with the Taliban mission to bring the Sharia to Pakistan?

If there was one solid unchallengeable version of the faith, then at least there would be a clear answer to this question. But conflict becomes inevitable once different models and interpretations start competing. Whose version of the Sharia should prevail? Whose jihad is the correct one? Who shall decide? Lacking a central authority — such as a pope or caliph — every individual or group can claim to be in possession of the divine truth. The murder of Dr Naeemi by the Taliban comes from this elementary fact.

For now the Baitullahs, Fazlullahs, Mangal Baghs, and their ilk are on the run. Yet, they could still win some day. Even if killed, others would replace them. So, while currently necessary, military action alone can never be sufficient. Nor will peace come from merely building more roads, schools and hospitals or inventing a new justice system.

Ultimately it is the power of ideas that shall decide between victory and defeat. It is here that Pakistan is weakest and most vulnerable. A gaping philosophical and ideological void has left the door open to demagogues who exploit resource scarcity and bad governance. They use every failing of the state to create an insurrectionary mood and churn out suicide bombers. Only a few Islamic scholars, like Dr Naeemi, have ventured to challenge them.

The long-term defence of Pakistan therefore demands a determined ideological offensive and a decisive break with the past. Nations win wars only if there is a clear rallying slogan and a shared goal. For this, Pakistan must reinvent itself as a state that is seen to care for its people. Instead of seeking to fix the world’s problems — Kashmir, Afghanistan and Palestine included — it must work to first fix its own.

A nation’s best defence is a loyal citizenry. This can be created only by offering equal rights and opportunities to all regardless of province, language and, most importantly, religion and religious sect. Navigating the way to heaven must be solely an individual’s concern, not that of the state.

The author teaches at Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad.
 
  • Like
Reactions: S-2
Excellent. Dr. Hoodboy to my thinking, is spot on with what the ideological or philosophical problem is and how it has caused so much confusion among Pakistanis - however; again, to my thinking, he is also spot on that the solution lies in :

Ultimately it is the power of ideas that shall decide between victory and defeat. It is here that Pakistan is weakest and most vulnerable. A gaping philosophical and ideological void has left the door open to demagogues who exploit resource scarcity and bad governance. They use every failing of the state to create an insurrectionary mood and churn out suicide bombers. Only a few Islamic scholars, like Dr Naeemi, have ventured to challenge them.

The long-term defence of Pakistan therefore demands a determined ideological offensive and a decisive break with the past. Nations win wars only if there is a clear rallying slogan and a shared goal. For this, Pakistan must reinvent itself as a state that is seen to care for its people. Instead of seeking to fix the world’s problems — Kashmir, Afghanistan and Palestine included — it must work to first fix its own.

A nation’s best defence is a loyal citizenry. This can be created only by offering equal rights and opportunities to all regardless of province, language and, most importantly, religion and religious sect. Navigating the way to heaven must be solely an individual’s concern, not that of the state.
 
That's interesting to note. Winning hearts and minds is just not working here. If a guy staying in the United States is not happy with the contribution of the Americans in Pakistan i can imagine the mood in the streets of Pakistan. Billions of dollars gone down the drain ha!! Doesn't argue too well for the American policy in relation to Pakistan in the long run. Makes one wonder as to what the future holds.

You are mixing two different arguments - whether the primary motivation for Pakistan acting after the collapse of the NAR peace deal was primarily due to US pressure, and whether the US has assisted Pakistan.

My comments were on the former argument.

As to the latter argument, the majority of the ten billion or so delivered so far is reimbursements under 'Coalition Support Funds' (CSF), for expenses incurred and services provided in support of US/NATO operations in Afghanistan.

It is therefore not any 'additional money' for Pakistan, merely what is owed us. The remainder of the ten billion was in the form of 1.5 billion debt write off, budgetary support and military aid - this portion of the ten billion is welcome assistance nonetheless, and of course the assistance for the IDP's is invaluable.
 
Last edited:
Inquiry commission: an imperative

By Kamran Shafi
Tuesday, 23 Jun, 2009

FIRST, many congratulations to our cricket team for winning the T20 World Cup! Our cricketers’ Herculean efforts are to be acknowledged even more because they won against other very gifted teams at a time of great stress for all Pakistanis: what else, but the deadly shemozzle in Swat and Fata.

It is a complete and utter shemozzle because we still don’t know whether we are coming or going after a full nine years that the Yahoos have been at it: destabilising the state; taking Swat over bit by bit; increasing their influence in Fata because of the stupid policies of the Commando and his cohorts who generally made a right royal mess of things. (Stand up, Gen Safdar, who ‘saw all; heard all’!)

As an aside, whilst we have to be grateful for small mercies like the great win of our cricket team, we must remember that the Yahoos who went about slaughtering at will, many times under the very noses of those who had been sent in to bring peace to Swat, look upon our national game as kufr. That is how far the Yahoos are from the reality of Pakistan and the very vast majority of its people.

Moving on, now that the Pakistani security state has strictly been ordered by its paymasters to stop its own creation and its children from the mayhem they were at, it is imperative for the government to immediately order an extensive probe by a high-powered commission to investigate the delay in taking on the Yahoos and related matters to do with their sudden rise. Such as the intelligence agencies’ miserable failure to warn the government of the coming storm(s).

This is imperative because the intelligence failure and the consequent delay resulted in the Yahoos getting stronger, which in turn allowed them to look for other prizes after Swat i.e. Buner which they took in a matter of days, and which ‘victory’ in turn spread fear and despondency across the land because districts like Haripur and Hazara were next in line, some villages in Haripur already in their thrall.

The body, set up on the lines of the Hamoodur Rehman Commission, should be made up of the many eminent gentlewomen and men we have in this country: jurists such as Justice Fakhruddin G. Ebrahim and Justice Rana Bhagwandas; former senior civil servants who have served in the Frontier as ‘politicals’, and whose integrity is above reproach; politicians such as Afzal Khan ‘Lala’ who saw the murderous Yahoos from close quarters; and representatives of the respected Human Rights Commission of Pakistan. And why not Maulana Edhi Sahib who has never shrunk from telling the truth? Or, and indeed, Air Marshal Nur Khan?

The commission must go into the details of the Commando’s and his coterie’s handiwork: from giving Sufi Mohammad refuge in the Dera Ismail Khan jail in 2001 when his own people wanted to lynch him for getting their innocent children killed in the American assault on Afghanistan, to the rise of Fazlullah and Baitullah and Mangal Bagh and other such Yahoos, to the complete detriment of the country.

The events are too well known and there is a treasure of detail available in books, newspaper stories and articles and in first-hand knowledge.

It must be noted that the security establishment will oppose this investigation (for that is what it will be, and will seek to apportion blame) with all its might but the political leaders simply must take the bit between the teeth and go for it. Let me add here that the commission might well find that politicians are to blame, or civil servants. Well, so be it, but it is high time that all those that have made the country a plaything to kick about as it takes their fancy be held to account and be firmly told that this is the end of the line for them.

For have we not had more than our share of disasters, even having the majority of our people break away in the heart-wrenching circumstances of the East Pakistan tragedy, that we should continue to let those who have repeatedly done the wrong thing have sway over our country?

The commission could ask, for example, why Fazlullah who had clear links to Baitullah’s TTP set up his headquarters in Imam Dhehri in 2002, and neither the federal government, ably commanded by the Commando, nor the one led by the MMA (aka the Mullah-Military Alliance) challenged him?

It could investigate the circumstances under which Afghan writer Fazal Wahab was assassinated in Swat for writing against Al Qaeda in 2003, and why Fazlullah was not stopped when he set up more than 30 illegal FM radio stations in 2004 to spread fear and terror among the populace of that once idyllic valley, even stopping on pain of agonising death innocent pursuits such as people wanting shaves? And attacking schools and music shops?

The commission could summon the Commando from his London penthouse and ask him why his government did not operate effectively between July 2007 when he ordered troops into Swat, and Oct 29, 2007 by which time Fazlullah with a few hundred murderous terrorists grew in strength, killing wantonly all who came in his way. Why were Fazlullah and his Yahoos handled with kid gloves by the Commando and his government(s) when the number of police and paramilitary and military personnel who lost their lives rose to over 100 with hundreds more wounded, many critically. Civilian casualties during this time were even higher, both killed and wounded.

It could ask him what happened to his ‘enlightened moderation’ — a term reportedly coined by Henry Kissinger’s lobbying firm — when Fazlullah set up his own courts in Swat in October 2007? Or when he began to behead people? Where were the army and the intelligence agencies and the other frightening paraphernalia of the security state when the people of Swat were being mercilessly killed, women included? And schools blown up?

There is much, much more which could be included in the commission’s writ.

By the by, could one ask why Nasim Ashraf who has so much to answer for in the way he ran his human development racket and the PCB, asked the England and Wales Cricket Board to ‘invite’ the Commando and Private Banker Shaukat Aziz to the final of the T20? Apart from the damage they have done the country they are rich enough to have bought themselves tickets to the game. What is Ashraf’s locus standi anyway?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom