What's new

The scientist who wasn't a spy

ajtr

BANNED
Joined
May 25, 2010
Messages
9,357
Reaction score
0
The scientist who wasn't a spy


Nambi Narayanan has lived an extraordinary life. Branded a spy in 1994, the Isro scientist has fought hard for his honour. The recent Kerala HC order for monetary compensation to him has brought a little more cheer to the man who says he's now ready to bring his tormentors to justice and expose the conspiracy against India's ambitious cryogenic project

They began their scientific careers as the two bright stars of India's space research programme . Later, of course, APJ Abdul Kalam's and S Nambi Narayanan's lives would go on separate trajectories and their stories would read very differently.
Kalam, who was working on the solid propulsion system in the Indian Space Research Organisation (Isro), went on to become a much-loved President of India. S Nambi Narayanan, who was working on the liquid propulsion system — the technology was successfully used in many satellite missions — during the same period, was branded a spy and traitor, his brilliant scientific career dented forever even as he fought against an unjust system to prove his innocence.
Narayanan, along with six others, including his Isro colleague D Sasikumar, was arrested on November 30, 1994 on charges of espionage and for selling defence secrets to two Maldivian women, Mariam Rasheeda and Fauzia Hassan.

He spent 50 days in jail after that and lived in anxiety and ignominy until the Supreme Court cleared him of the charges in 1998. But even after that he never got to work in the prestigious cryogenics field at ISRO. Last week, the Kerala high court upheld an order of the National Human Rights Commission directing the state to pay a compensation of Rs 10 lakh to the scientist for implicating him in a false case. But that doesn't really mean much to him now.
Sitting in his spacious living room, at West Fort in Thiruvananthapuram, amidst rocket models and European paintings, 71-year-old Narayanan resembles Alexander Solzhenitsyn, the tortured Russian Noble Prize-winning author who was expelled from the Soviet Union. "They framed me in a false case, perhaps to destroy India's space research program which was moving at a fast pace," he says in a soft voice, caressing his long, grey beard that shines in the morning sun.
In those dark days, the media so convincingly printed and parroted everything that one particular police inspector said that even educated Keralites began believing the concocted stories that detailed illicit links between a scientist and a couple of random Maldivian women. The controversy was soon used by a section of Congress politicians to tarnish the image of then chief minister K Karunakaran , who was already embroiled in what was called the Palmolein scam.
"I spent 50 days in jail and the state police pressured me to say that even the Isro top brass was involved," says Narayanan. The case was later taken over by the CBI which found no evidence, and said it was fabricated. This was later upheld by the Supreme Court. But it may not be closure yet for Narayanan as the identity of key players who fuelled the case still remains in the dark. Also, the question remains unanswered whether it was merely an unfortunate chain of events or if there was a larger game plan.
Narayanan, personally, believes in the role of some external agencies which wanted to halt India's cryogenic space research programme. "We can now put the jigsaw puzzle together if we can look at what was happening internationally at that time as India was cutting into a billion dollar space industry poised to take off with its cryogenic engine research," he says.
Police inspector Vijayan, who registered the first case against the two Maldivian women for overstaying, and the vernacular media which printed verbatim what the state police said, were perhaps minor characters in a larger international conspiracy.
India, by the early 1990s, had developed its own solid and liquid fuel and was able to put its satellites in orbits up to 800km. But the ultimate challenge was to develop a cryogenic engine that would propel heavy rockets with payloads of more than three tonnes to the geo-synchronous orbit, 36,000 km away from earth. These satellites would then provide accurate geo-spatial images of earth and would usher in a path-breaking revolution in telecommunication and media. Cryogenics, the science of extreme low temperatures, has been a tricky one for rocket scientists across the world.
"At stake was a 300 billon dollar space research and applications industry which was in the hands of five nations — the US, France, China, Russia, and Japan. Almost every major country wanted to put its own satellites in the orbit and they could do it only with the help of these five nations,'' says J Rajashekaran Nair, who authored Spies from Space: The ISRO Frame-up .
In 1992, India signed an agreement with Russia for transfer of technology to develop cryogenic-based fuels. The agreement was signed for Rs 235 crore, when the US and France were offering the same technology for Rs 950 crore and Rs 650 crore respectively. "Documents show that US president George Bush (Sr) wrote to Russia, raising objections against this agreement and even threatening to blacklist the country from the select-five club,'' Rajashekaran says.
Russia, under Boris Yelstin, succumbed to the pressure and denied cryogenic technology to India. To bypass this monopoly, India signed a new agreement with Russia to fabricate four cryogenic engines after floating a global tender without a formal transfer of technology.'
Isro had already reached a consensus with Kerala High Tech Industries Limited (Keltch) which would have provided the cheapest tender for fabricating engines . But this did not happen as the spy scandal surfaced in late 1994. "If you look at the people who were arrested in the case, they were all connected in some way in developing or procuring the technology . We cannot rule out foul play by an external agency," says Rajashekaran.
The plot, says Narayanan, was to tarnish the image of a premier research institution. "How could we have leaked out cryogenic missile technology when we did not even possess one? But what we lost in the process was years of hard work to revolutionise our space research , and the credibility and morale of our scientific community. And on a personal level, it ruined the lives of six families who were dragged into the case for no fault of theirs.''
 
.
Best of example of congress Raj the money hounds of those times ohh dear i am pretty sure there would be atleast 10 to 12 such stories of Indian scientists being done by the government they don't love country they love money and we still vote them now who is responsible the politicians or us....
 
.
This smells like another samba spy scandal or Captain B.K.Subbarao espionage case.
 
.
Very possible.....the way i see it.....our India smells high of corruption time to bleach the **** out of it....
 
.
‘My book will name the people who framed me’

You were heading India's cryogenic project when you were arrested. How did the project suffer?

S Nambi Narayanan: I have every reason to doubt that an external force has tried to destabilise our space programme. But I will not mention any particular country or agency, because I and my family have suffered enough. But if you look at the circumstances, countries like the US were dead against India signing a deal with Russia on the transfer of cryogenic technology. They would have lost a billion dollar business, as every country today wants to launch their own satellites into the geosynchronous orbit. When I was interrogated by the state police, they pressured me to put the blame on the Isro chairman. I did not succumb to pressure . Come to think of it, these are not isolated incidents. The mysterious deaths of eminent scientists like Vikram Sarabhai (his postmortem was not conducted ) and Homi Bhabha are classic examples.

You are writing a book on the issue. Will it have details of what actually happened ?

S Nambi Narayanan:
Yes. In that book I will name those people who framed me for selfish motives , and the conspiracy to tarnish the image of Isro. The book will also speak about the generosity and kindness of some senior space scientists. My wife still has not completely recovered from the shock. There were moments when I thought I should end my life, but I knew if I did that I would die as a spy and the truth would be buried forever.

You were a contemporary of Abdul Kalam and in many ways made a larger contribution in terms of developing liquid fuel ...

I have great regard for Abdul Kalam. He was one amongst the few along with U R Rao, who came out in the open to say that I was innocent. But the scientific community was too stunned to react. Kalam, the pragmatic man he is, told me to leave everything to God. But I had decided to fight and clear my name from this fabricated case. I had spent my entire life for scientific research work. My mother died on a Saturday, yet, I was back to work on Monday.

Do you regret that now?

S Nambi Narayanan:
I do regret that I did not spend time with my family and groom my children . The unscrupulous vernacular media gave me a grand title: Charan (spy). They did not check facts, but just printed the version handed out by the state police. The state police arrested me on the same day (November 30, 1994) when they recommended my case to be transferred to the CBI. The police did not even bother to raid my house before or after the arrest.

What are your future plans?

S Nambi Narayanan:
I will see to it that the people who implicated me go behind bars and I am adequately compensated for the mental trauma. The government should probe into the case in detail and find out the real culprits. After passing out from Princeton University, where physicists like Albert Einstein worked, I was offered lucrative jobs in NASA and a US citizenship but I came back as I felt I should be part of the nascent space research programme in India. We started with just 26 people and now Isro has grown to 26,000 people. My book will speak about everything, including my glorious years, during which I had an opportunity to interact with eminent scientists like Vikram Sarabhai , Satish Dhawan and U R Rao.
 
.
IB Imagined Spy-Ring: CBI
A classified CBI report indicts IB. But was the espionage scandal part of a wider frame-up?


WAS the role of the Intelligence Bureau (IB) in the ISRO spy scandal motivated? Even as the Kerala government has been directed by the Supreme Court to pay Rs 1 lakh each to the six accused, a hard-hitting CBI report submitted two years ago to the Centre recommending "necessary action" against senior IB officials responsible for "lapses" in the case has been put under wraps. The report severely indicts D.C. Pathak, the then IB director, and nine other senior officers for mishandling the investigation and sending unverified reports to the prime minister and home minister. This is perhaps the first time that an IB chief has been indicted.

But why did the IB act in such a manner?Was it a mistake on the part of senior IB officials or was it a deliberate attempt to frame the top ISRO scientists? The CBI report does not touch upon this angle, but one theory emanating from the IB itself is that Mariam Rasheeda, a Maldivian accused in the case, was set up by some foreign agency in order to humiliate two key ISRO scientists, D. Sasikumaran and S. Nambi Narayan, demoralise their colleagues and thereby slow down the indigenous cryogenic engines project.

The CBI report claims the IB was the main organisation responsible for creating an imaginary spy-ring and falsely implicating the two Indian space scientists. In the process, the CBI brief might give the acquitted persons a handle to file defamation cases against the IB officials.

The report points out how Pathak issued unofficial notes based on unconfirmed information, implicating innocent people like Kerala IGP Ramon Srivastava. "The Director IB (DIB) sent several notes referred to above to important functionaries, little realising that those notes from the DIB would be treated as authentic and having been sent after careful verification and consequences of report being false or untrue would be serious," it says.

The ISRO probe was handed over to the CBI after the IB opined that the case had "international ramifications". On initiating investigations, the CBI found that the information collected by the IB and the Kerala police was not only false but was forcefully extracted from the six accused—Mariam Rasheeda, Fouzia Hassan (both Maldivian citizens), Nambi Narayan, Sasikumaran, Glavkosmos representative K. Chandra-shekhar and businessman S.K. Sharma. It filed its closure report on April 30, 1996, recommending that the accused be discharged.

Soon after coming to power in Kerala, the LDF government ordered further investigations. This was successfully challenged by the CBI in the Supreme Court, which passed strictures against the state government.

Even though the CBI's brief did not include an investigation into the real 'motive' of the IB officials for creating a false case, it has indicted the IB in unequivocal terms. The 32-page report—marked "confidential", details of which are available with Outlook—shows the country's premier counter-intelligence agency in a poor light. The contents, so far unreported, also throw light on the "unprofessional" and shoddy manner in which investigations were carried out by the IB.

The CBI report was sent by DIG Sharad Kumar to the home secretary on June 3, 1996. It notes: "During the course of investigation of RC 11(S)/94 (ISRO case), certain lapses on the part of some officers of the Central Intelligence Bureau came to light. A self-contained note in this regard is enclosed herewith for necessary action as deemed fit." After questioning several IB officials associated with the probe, the CBI has named, apart from Pathak, at least nine IB officers: deputy director R. B. Srikumar; joint director Mathew John; assistant director C.R.R. Nair; DCIO G.S. Nair; DCIO K.V. Thomas; DCIO M.J. Punen; ACIO (Kochi) P.S Jaiprakash; DD-SIB (Mumbai) C.M. Ravindran; and DCIO (Delhi) V.K. Maini.

The report observes: "The aforesaid IB officials comprising the team enquiring into ISRO case acted in an unprofessional manner and were privy to the arrest of six innocent persons, thereby causing them immense mental and physical agony." It categorically indicts Mathew John and Srikumar for "failing in their duty to conduct the inquiry in an objective and fair manner".

Sources in ISRO say the conspiracy theory needs to be investigated. They feel the need to check India's advances in rocket propulsion was an economic necessity for others. Giant corporations in the US and France were providing launch rockets for Indian satellites for $50-60 million. Their business interests were bound to have been severely affected if ISRO developed its own propulsion technology. Moreover, ISRO also had a long-term plan to enter the launch technology market and provide services cheaper than the western corporations.

Interestingly, a year before the scandal broke the then ISRO chairman, U.R. Rao, had accused commercial powers like the US of obstructing India's attempt at self-reliance in space technology. Earlier, the US had clamped a two-year embargo on the sale and transfer of space technology to India for alleged violation of the MTCR (missile technology control regime) rules. ISRO was also deprived of Russian support in the development of cryogenic technology at the instance of the US.

Nambi Narayan and Sasikumaran had visited Glavkosmos, the Russian space agency, to facilitate the transfer of cryogenic technology. The spy scandal, according to Sasikumaran, effectively broke the chain of scientists working on the project.

According to IB sources, senior Bureau officials may have knowingly or unwittingly played into the hands of an international lobby. And it was the IB in Delhi which monitored the case and provided the state police with "vital" clues.

The entire episode has once again brought into sharp focus the issue of transparency and accountability of the country's intelligence agencies. Certain important questions regarding the IB's style of functioning and the conduct of some of its officials still remain unanswered. And, experts say, only a thorough probe can provide satisfactory answers.

The ISRO case has become the burning example of the manner in which Indian intelligence agencies function. The CBI report indicates how an innocuous-looking case of a foreign national extending a visit can be blown out of proportion by torturing the accused physically and mentally to extract "confessions". The case began on October 20, 1994, with the arrest of Rasheeda, a Maldivian citizen who had overstayed in India without a valid visa. Incidentally, Rasheeda happened to be a former agent of the Maldivian intelligence agency, the National Security Service, and had jotted down some information about the activities of a group opposed to the Maldivian president Ghayoom in her personal diary.

Believing that they had tumbled across a major spy-ring around India's space programme, the IB officials jumped the gun. A special emissary was sent to "inform" Ghayoom about the plot being hatched to overthrow him. "The authorities in Male laughed at this information because the person who was said to be one of the conspirators was present in the meeting," says a former IB Joint Director. But IB decided to go ahead with its operation anyway.

The questions which have now come to the fore are: was IB playing into the hands of an outside agency? Was it used by certain outside agency/corporation to deflate India's space programme by discrediting India's top-notch space scientists like Nambi Narayan and Sasikumaran? "It is rather impossible to buy over the entire organisation, but one or two core people can always be influenced," says a senior CBI official associated with the probe. He also points out that projects in space research are carried out by a team of experts from different disciplines. "You pull out one or two of them and the chain is broken, destroying the entire project," he explains.

THAT the IB sleuths conducted the investigation in a shoddy manner without checking the veracity of the information gathered is evident from the interrogation reports submitted by the IB. The report of one of the accused K. Chandrashekhar gives information about "the suspected KGB men" who operated in India. It reads: "In respect of Indian contacts, Lalit Suri of Holiday Inn, Delhi, having rice deal with USSR and Saurab Chaudhary (of Power Tools) s/o Indrajit Gupta, MP, are the prominent ones." The reports are not signed, a typical IB methodology to shirk accountability.

In fact, nothing significant came out of Rasheeda's interrogation till the Kerala police seized her personal diary which contained notes on the activities of the anti-Ghayoom faction. From then on, the IB's role became prominent. The CBI report notes that after the IB came into the scene, it took Rasheeda from the Kerala police and kept her separately in a CRPF guest house. According to Inspector K. Vijayan of the Kerala police, who first arrested Rasheeda: "The IB wanted the local police to be kept out of all activities, including interrogation."

And how did the IB force Rasheeda to speak? The CBI report says: "The IB officials told Rasheeda...if she did not tell the truth, she would be stripped naked and would be made to lie on ice and insects would be thrown on her body."

After thorough investigation the CBI arrived at the following conclusions:

"The IB officers conducted interrogation in a hush-hush manner, totally dissociating the Kerala Police, for reasons best known to them";
"They tortured/ill-treated at least three accused persons, Mariam Rasheeda, Chandrashekhar and Nambi Narayan";
"They interrogated Nambi Narayan and S.K. Sharma but did not prepare interrogation reports on them. It appears their statements were not recorded as they did not toe the line suggested by the IB officials";
"The interrogation of Fau-zia Hassan, Chandrashekhar and Sasikumaran were videographed by IB officers but none of them during their examination admitted having done it. What is surprising is that even Mathew John, who was over-all in-charge of interrogation, failed to identify such officers";
"IB officers did not (seek) the veracity of the statement of the accused. If they had done so properly as any professional agency would do...the honour of respectable scientists could have been saved";
"Even the senior officers of IB stated that the disclosures made by the accused persons were a mixture of truth, half-truth and untruth. Notwithstanding this, the officials on the spot did not conduct verification of the disclosure. If they had made the verifications at that time, arrests of innocent persons could have been avoided."
Significantly, Pathak's role has come under heavy criticism. He drew sweeping conclusions about certain people without confirming the information sent to him from his subordinates based in Thiruvananthapuram. Pathak sent an unofficial (UO) note (No. 303/DIB/DESP/94) on November 21, 1994, saying that a Hyderabad-based businessman, M.T.A.R. Ravindra Reddy, an important person in the spy-ring, had "business dealings" with Prabhakar Rao, son of the then prime minister, P.V. Narasimha Rao, but later contradicted it. IB sources said Nara-simha Rao was peeved at Pathak's letter but did not shunt him out to avoid yet another controversy involving his son.

Not only this, Pathak advised that Ramon Srivastava, IG Police, Kerala, be brought into the ambit of the case without spelling out the evidence on record against him. The CBI report notes that "the DIB first issued UO notes to highest functionaries in the government of India indicating involvement of Ramon Srivastava, M.T.A.R. Ravindra Reddy and others and subsequently negated his own version given in the earlier notes". Insiders say normally a deputy director is allowed to sign a report unless it is of a highly sensitive nature but Pathak clearly went overboard.

The ISRO case has brought the old question of accountability of the intelligence agencies to the fore. In fact, a move initiated by BJP leader Jaswant Singh in 1989 as chairman of the Parliament Estimates Committee to bring RAW, IB and CBI under the ambit of parliamentary scrutiny was resisted tooth and nail by intelligence mandarins. The Supreme Court's observation and the CBI report on the 'lapses' by the IB provide a good opportunity to the Atal Behari Vajpayee government to pick up the lead and set the country's intelligence system in order.

=========================================

I do see CT in this case ie to protect PM PVNR's son prabhakar rao being implicated congress used IB to falsely frame ISRO's scientists.
 
.
When I looked up Homi, Vikram and Shastri....it becomes quite obvious....these deaths were intentional. What bothers me, is that our govt and media never took a closer look or even acknowledged some sinister angle to these deaths. This and Kargil further compunds my perception that our defence is totally clueless about how the world really operates. We might know a lot but our failure to act and stop such actions is so obvious.


Just a bit more: The US and CHinese scientists can build helis as small as a peanut to spy, is the Indian govt even aware of such devices? Do they even have a plan in place to protect our secrets? When I saw wood paneling in the gov;t offices in Delhi, I giggled aloud. Do you even know Russia has implanted a recording device in such wood paneling with such ease in the US decades ago?
 
.
S Nambi Narayanan:[/B] I do regret that I did not spend time with my family and groom my children . The unscrupulous vernacular media gave me a grand title: Charan (spy). They did not check facts, but just printed the version handed out by the state police.

Malayalam(Kerala) media is a buch of @$$holes!!!!
 
.
When I looked up Homi, Vikram and Shastri....it becomes quite obvious....these deaths were intentional. What bothers me, is that our govt and media never took a closer look or even acknowledged some sinister angle to these deaths. This and Kargil further compunds my perception that our defence is totally clueless about how the world really operates. We might know a lot but our failure to act and stop such actions is so obvious.


Just a bit more: The US and CHinese scientists can build helis as small as peanuts to spy, is the Indian govt even aware of such devices? Do they even have a plan in place to protect our secrets? Wjhen I saw wood paneling in the gov;t offices in Delhi, i giggled aloud. Do you even know Russia implanted a recording device in such wood paneling with such ease?
Why russians,americans,chinese need to take all the trouble of making a peanut size chopper to spy on india when they can directly recruit the ministers in GoI itself if price is right.There was one minister in indira gandhi's cabinet spying for americans during 1971 war.
 
.
Why russians,americans,chinese need to take all the trouble of making a peanut size chopper to spy on india when they can directly recruit the ministers in GoI itself if price is right.There was one minister in indira gandhi's cabinet spying for americans during 1971 war.

that being who ?
 
.
Why russians,americans,chinese need to take all the trouble of making a peanut size chopper to spy on india when they can directly recruit the ministers in GoI itself if price is right.There was one minister in indira gandhi's cabinet spying for americans during 1971 war.

that being who ?
 
. .

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom