The Real Two Nation Theory Is Cultural

[Indus Priest King]

Exactly.

BTW, to the clown who posted that Lava crap...why is a Gangetic text talking about Lahore, an Indus city? I thought Daysus hated Mlecha?

It's funny how they quote myths like the Puranas, Manusmiriti, Ramayana and Mahabharata....all four of those texts were written in the Ganges plain. They are irreverent when it comes to Indus history. The Indus Vedics and the Indus people rejected that nonsense.

That's why we called Ganges plain as DASYU VARTA.

 

[DarkPrince]

I've posted this online as well. It's gotten a fantastic response. Funny enough, the typical Al-Bakistani (Pseudo-Pakistan) brigade chose not to respond. Only a few did, and when I raised the question of Islamic parties opposing Pakistan, they as usual had no answer.

https://www.facebook.com/video.php?v=1631613896898588

Nice read. However you are missing Afghan parts Pathanistan. Delhi is indeed where North India ends.

 

[Indus Priest King]

The map was quickly made....it's not an accurate representation....just a general idea.

 

[Indus Priest King]

Bumping.

 

[Buddhistforlife]

Those who claim that two nation theory is cultural not religious are either totally ignorant or just are way to naive. We eat cow and Hindus worship it that is not cultural difference that is religious difference. They worship idols and we consider ourselves idol breakers. That is religious issue not cultural. Nothing about two nation theory is cultural but everything is religious.

Hindus and Muslims could have coexisted together in one United India and could have developed the entire Indian subcontinent. It is the extremist and radical mentality of the then Muslim league which created Pakistan. Hindus had no problem living with Muslims and neither did they deprive Muslims of anything.

 

[Zarvan]

Hindus and Muslims could have coexisted together in one United India and could have developed the entire Indian subcontinent. It is the extremist and radical mentality of the then Muslim league which created Pakistan. Hindus had no problem living with Muslims and neither did they deprive Muslims of anything.

Yes Yes cut the crap. Thousands of Muslims were butchered in India. In India in their premier agency RAW Muslims can't join it. Still their are areas in India where you can't buy flat just because you are a Muslim so please give me a break.

 

[Buddhistforlife]

Yes Yes cut the crap. Thousands of Muslims were butchered in India. In India in their premier agency RAW Muslims can't join it. Still their are areas in India where you can't buy flat just because you are a Muslim so please give me a break.

I agree with the butchering and flat part. But when it comes to intelligence agency I think it's all about trust because Pakistani Hindu citizens also cannot join ISI.

 

[ZAC1]

If u belive that there is no diff ....plz ask a muslim to drink a cup of cow urine...u will have ur answer

 

[AUz]

Dumb thread.

The reason our culture is different (and far superior) to indians (hindu) culture is because of religion.

So yes, two nation theory was based on religion and rightfully so.

Thank you, next

Hindus and Muslims could have coexisted together in one United India and could have developed the entire Indian subcontinent. It is the extremist and radical mentality of the then Muslim league which created Pakistan. Hindus had no problem living with Muslims and neither did they deprive Muslims of anything.

Sorry, we don’t like to drink cow urine.

Also, we’d much rather have our own independent power nuclear-armed Islamic state than to live with hindus.

Thank you for your concern, but no thanks. We hit a lottery by being lucky enough to have Islamic Republic of Pakistan in subcontinent.

 

[Pan-Islamic-Pakistan]

Why we letting trolls resurrect dead threads?

@Indus Priest King has many great threads but he is no longer here to comment on them.