The Real Two Nation Theory Is Cultural

[DarkPrince]

Again to slap you to reality, it is same. They all consider it dispute and genocide against Muslim natives. Be it Iran, Turkeye, Central Asia, North Africa, Gulf States or Indonesia/Malaysia. And like I said, nobody gives a fk about what indian @$ l1cking puppet states interests are.

No they are not same. Palestine is holy land for Muslims. Jerusalem is a holy city for Muslims. Is Srinagar holy for Muslims? I don't think so. There's your answer they are not same.

 

[American Pakistani]

No they are not same. Palestine is holy land for Muslims. Jerusalem is a holy city for Muslims. Is Srinagar holy for Muslims? I don't think so. There's your answer they are not same.

Both are same in a nature as their Muslim population is constantly being harassed and killed.

 

[waz]

True. It's Kashmiris should decide not Poonjabi babus.

No Palestine and Kashmir are not same. I think it's best interest of Indian Muslims and Bangladeshis if Kashmir remains with India.

But i do agree that ultimately Kashmiris should decide that.

We care neither for what nationalist Indian Muslims or nationalist Bengalis think about what should happen to the Kashmiris, you actually gave up that right when you broke away. They are culturally and religiously close to Pakistanis and they want to unite with us.

 

[Indus Priest King]

Those who claim that two nation theory is cultural not religious are either totally ignorant or just are way to naive. We eat cow and Hindus worship it that is not cultural difference that is religious difference. They worship idols and we consider ourselves idol breakers. That is religious issue not cultural. Nothing about two nation theory is cultural but everything is religious.

The only one ignorant here is you. Have you ever met a Hindu from Pakistan in your life? This is the problem with Pakistanis...some of them are so ignorant and extremist that they cannot fathom anything else other than what they've been brainwashed with.

Your whole concept of "Hinduism" revolves around the culture of North India. Newsflash...Hinduism differs from region to region. In Pakistan, Hindus mostly follow VEDIC ideology. In North India, Hindus mostly follow PURANIC ideology. There's a vast difference between the two.

Most Hindus in Pakistan still incorporate some aspect of the Vedic faith. This can be proven from the gods that are worshiped among the different communities of Hindus in Pakistan:

- In Sindh, the most revered god among Sindhi Hindus is Jhulelal (Ishta-Deva). They regard Jhulelal to be a incarnation of Varuna, an early Vedic god who was adopted from the Iranian Avestan deity Ahura Mazda.

- In Kashmir, Pandits worship a Vedic god known as Kheer Bhawani.

- In KP, the Kalash tribe (although not Hindus) revere an Indra-like figure as the central part of their religion. Indra was adopted by the Vedic culture originally from the Zoroastrian deity Verethraghna.

Vedic culture is still prevalent among the Hindus in Pakistan and the Kalash. A large percentage of Hindus in Pakistan are non vegetarian and some Hindu clans in Pakistan bury their dead. In Hyderabad you can find the famous graveyard of Thakur Jaati Hindus. Laal Chand Raybari, the first Pakistani Hindu soldier to be martyred, was buried rather than cremated.

Also, there is NO caste system among Hindu communities in Pakistan. The VEDIC ideology forbids hierarchical caste system. There are divisions, but they are no considered higher or better or lower than anyone else. There is no "Dalit" in Pakistan either. This term was foolishly adopted by our stupid government in 1947 and in an insult and slap in the face to our Vedic history and the history of Vedic Hindus in Pakistan.

Learn something before spewing out your nonsense.

 

[PAKISTANFOREVER]

Those who claim that two nation theory is cultural not religious are either totally ignorant or just are way to naive. We eat cow and Hindus worship it that is not cultural difference that is religious difference. They worship idols and we consider ourselves idol breakers. That is religious issue not cultural. Nothing about two nation theory is cultural but everything is religious.

..........only Religion????...... ........so Pakistani Pathans, Balouch, Persianized Nomadic tribes and Punjabis are the same race as South/central indians and bengalis???????.................They're all the same, only their religion is different.......lol.......

 

[Zarvan]

..........only Religion????...... ........so Pakistani Pathans, Balouch, Persianized Nomadic tribes and Punjabis are the same race as South/central indians and bengalis???????.................They're all the same, only their religion is different.......lol.......

Pakistani Baloch and Pathan and Sindhis and Punjabis are mainly Muslims what are you trying to say here Mr ????

 

[PAKISTANFOREVER]

Pakistani Baloch and Pathan and Sindhis and Punjabis are mainly Muslims what are you trying to say here Mr ????

Agreed. But indian Muslims and bengali Muslims are just as alien to Pakistani Muslims as the hindus and sikhs are.

 

[TMA]

Those who claim that two nation theory is cultural not religious are either totally ignorant or just are way to naive. We eat cow and Hindus worship it that is not cultural difference that is religious difference. They worship idols and we consider ourselves idol breakers. That is religious issue not cultural. Nothing about two nation theory is cultural but everything is religious.

Even if today's Pakistanis were Vedic Dharm followers, they would still not be the same as Bharat. Are Britons the same as Spanish as the French as the Italian as the Germans. Sure they have great commonalities but there are distinct ethnographic-cultural identities despite being (nominally) Christian. Why is this difficult for Pakistanis to get? Most of us are not Arab or Persian by blood and those that are are heavily intermixed with the natives. We are the descendants for the most part of people who followed the Vedic Dharms. An Indonesian is not confused nor a Malaysian nor a Chechen nor a Ghanian about his identity. Why do Pakistanis get confused?

Pakistani Baloch and Pathan and Sindhis and Punjabis are mainly Muslims what are you trying to say here Mr ????

If they were not Muslim but followed their forebears footsteps, they would still not be the same as Bharatis.

 

[Zhukov]

People please comment after reading the whole article and Discussion. Don't just Comment after reading the title Please

 

[Indus Priest King]

People please comment after reading the whole article and Discussion. Don't just Comment after reading the title Please

Thank you.

 

[DarkPrince]

We care neither for what nationalist Indian Muslims or nationalist Bengalis think about what should happen to the Kashmiris, you actually gave up that right when you broke away. They are culturally and religiously close to Pakistanis and they want to unite with us.

Fair enough then again you shouldn't get angry what we chose. Indian Muslims have much more freedom than Chinese Muslims. They don't even let them keep rozas.

 

[waz]

Fair enough then again you shouldn't get angry what we chose. Indian Muslims have much more freedom than Chinese Muslims. They don't even let them keep rozas.

As for choose, you can do what ever you like when it comes to Bengali Muslims.

As for the rest no they don't, Indian Muslims have faced horrendous massacres with tact state help e.g. Gujarat. Chinese Muslims do fast, that is incorrect and I have asked this myself from them at Haj. This story comes up every year during Ramadan.

 

[Indus Priest King]

I've posted this online as well. It's gotten a fantastic response. Funny enough, the typical Al-Bakistani (Pseudo-Pakistan) brigade chose not to respond. Only a few did, and when I raised the question of Islamic parties opposing Pakistan, they as usual had no answer.

https://www.facebook.com/video.php?v=1631613896898588

 

[doorstar]

lol, try again with facts.

When gandhara is mentioned in mahabharata what makes you think that the regions in between were not known?

well either you can use facts or just keep parroting words like vedic,manusmriti..etc which you have no idea about.

Lava Mandir is a Hindu temple dedicated to the Hindu deity Lava, the son of Rama. It is in Lahore Fort, Lahore, Pakistan. The city itself is named after him.

Etymology of Lahore from Wikipedia
The origins of Lahore's name are unclear. Lahore's name had been recorded by early Muslim historians as Lōhar, Lōhār, and Rahwar. Al-Biruni referred to the city as Lohāwar in his 11th century work, Qanun, while the poet Amir Khusrow, who lived during the Delhi Sultanate, recorded the city's name as Lāhanūr. Medieval Rajput sources recorded the city's name as Lavkot.

One theory suggests that Lahore’s name is a corruption of the word Ravāwar, as R to L shifts are common in languages derived from Sanskrit. Ravāwar is the simplified pronunciation of the name Iravatyāwar - a name possibly derived from the Ravi River, known as the Iravati River in the Vedas. Another theory suggests the city's name may derive from the word Lohar, meaning "blacksmith."

According to Hindu tradition, Lahore's name derives from Lavpur or Lavapuri ("City of Lava"), and is said to have been founded by Prince Lava, the son of Sita and Rama. The same account attributes the founding of nearby Kasur by his twin brother Prince Kusha, Historic record shows, however, that Kasur was founded by Pashtun migrants in 1525

References:

1. Suvorova, Anna (2004-07-22). Muslim Saints of South Asia: The Eleventh to Fifteenth Centuries. Routledge. ISBN 1134370059.
2. Journal of Central Asia. Centre for the Study of the Civilizations of Central Asia, Quaid-i-Azam University. 1978.
3. Boltz, William G.; Shapiro, Michael C. (1991-01-01). Studies in the Historical Phonology of Asian Languages. John Benjamins Publishing. ISBN 9027235740.
4. Journal of Asian Civilisations. Taxila Institute of Asian Civilisations. 2001.
5. Gazetteer of the Ferozpur District: 1883. 1883.
6. Bombay Historical Society (1946). Annual bibliography of Indian history and Indology, Volume 4. p. 257. Retrieved 2009-05-29.
7. Baqir, Muhammad (1985). Lahore, past and present. B.R. Pub. Corp. pp. 19–20. Retrieved 2009-05-29.
8. Nadiem, Ihsan N (2005). Punjab: land, history, people. Al-Faisal Nashran. p. 111. ISBN 9789695032831. Retrieved 2009-05-29.
9. Chopra, Gulshan Lall (1940). Chiefs and Families of Note in the Punjab. Government Printing.
10. Neville, p.xii

A legend based on oral traditions holds that Lahore, known in ancient times as Lavapuri (City of Lava in Sanskrit),[1] was founded by Prince Lava,[2] the son of Sita and Rama; Kasur was founded by his twin brother Prince Kusha.[3] To this day, Lahore Fort has a vacant Lava temple dedicated to Lava (also pronounced Loh, hence Loh-awar or "The Fort of Loh")

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Origins_of_Lahore

Not a full quote, you are being selective and distorting like the OP

 

[Feng Leng]

The whole Republic of India is a big lie. They should be called the Republic of Gangeia.