What's new

"The real terrorist was me" : US Soldier (must watch it)

1270321809515.jpg

even dick cheney's employ is admitting it was dick cheney's war to shape the bigger game ben gurion's children want to play.
 
.
The "Jewish" representation at the beggining reminds me of the thread about Danemark, where everyone was saying how you could insult Islam but everyone else was off-limits. Two faced at its best.
 
.
The "Jewish" representation at the beggining reminds me of the thread about Danemark, where everyone was saying how you could insult Islam but everyone else was off-limits. Two faced at its best.

attack of the jew patrol..
 
. . . .
More US soldiers' atrocities against the Iraqis...

amer_atro_see-saw.jpg


amer_atro_gi-eat-child.jpg


amer_atro_child-tort2.jpg


amer_atro_child-tort1.jpg


amer_atro_child-shield.jpg


amer_atro_child-labor.jpg


amer_atro_child-fball.jpg


amer_atro_child-bite.jpg

you can't be serious.
War does cause collateral damage.

Why can't you people admit to the fact of civilian deaths?
Is it really that hard to swallow?

Shame on You!
 
.
you can't be serious.
War does cause collateral damage.

Why can't you people admit to the fact of civilian deaths?
Is it really that hard to swallow?

Shame on You!

who exactly are you picking on, americans or them against this war!
 
.
who exactly are you picking on, americans or them against this war!

neither!

Any American with an ounce of compassion would have apologized, or felt some shame, heck even feel for those that died without reason.

Instead I got a few pictures from Gambit, ignoring it and simply 'trying to look at the brighter side' :sick:
Some Americans and their ignorance are beyond me.
 
.
you can't be serious.
War does cause collateral damage.

Why can't you people admit to the fact of civilian deaths?
Is it really that hard to swallow?

Shame on You!

War does cause collateral deaths and is one of the horrible aspects of war. And there is no country in this world that goes to the lengths to reduce collateral damage more then the U.S.

Soldiers in the field get frustrated all the time when they receive fire from Taliban and are not allowed to call in fire support. Because of the chance of collateral damage to civilians. For the scope and length of the war in Afghanistan collateral damage has been very low compared to other wars. Look at WWII or Vietnam or Korea and you will see collateral damage on a very huge scale. As long as there is war there will be civilian's that get caught in the crossfire. And it doesn't matter if it's the U.S., Pakistan, India, China, or Russia doing the fighting.

What irks some are the people with agendas. Including many on this site that want to use this sad reality of war. And accuse the side that goes out of its way more then any other country of war crimes.

As far as the thread video all major wars have small numbers of soldiers that oppose it. If you talk to the average soldier in the field though they realize why we are there. And while they would like to be home. They also don't want to leave with out stability being brought. The problem comes not from the soldiers but the politicians. Just like Obama’s current move to go against what his field commanders are telling him needs to happen. For me the 2012 elections can't come fast enough so we can vote that man out of office.
 
.
we have guts to accept what wrong we have done, ISI trained militants..yes, but how the hell can u forget "chalie wilsons war"...

I don't think so. If you peek out a little, you will find how vociferously ISI is defended on this forum for the very confession you have made.
 
.
War does cause collateral deaths and is one of the horrible aspects of war. And there is no country in this world that goes to the lengths to reduce collateral damage more then the U.S.

I don't think you can defend the Iraq war. The compulsion that led you there, was it justified?

BTW Have you watched the movie Green Zone? I don't think it was made out of propaganda story.
 
.
I don't think you can defend the Iraq war. The compulsion that led you there, was it justified?

BTW Have you watched the movie Green Zone? I don't think it was made out of propaganda story.

Yes it was Justified, ask most Iraqi's and they will agree. And the green zone was as intended, a fictional war movie based on the real war with an anti war slant.
 
.
Yes it was Justified,

For the WMDs that you never found?

Or for the oil reserves you had your eyes set?

Secret US plans for Iraq's oil

In Rebuilding Iraq’s Oil Industry, U.S. Subcontractors Hold Sway


ask most Iraqi's and they will agree.

You mean What Iraqis think of the U.S. occupation. or a poll: Iraq war opposition at record high

And the green zone was as intended, a fictional war movie based on the real war with an anti war slant.
But the movie in its initials noted, "Based on a true story".
 
.
War does cause collateral deaths and is one of the horrible aspects of war. And there is no country in this world that goes to the lengths to reduce collateral damage more then the U.S.

Soldiers in the field get frustrated all the time when they receive fire from Taliban and are not allowed to call in fire support. Because of the chance of collateral damage to civilians. For the scope and length of the war in Afghanistan collateral damage has been very low compared to other wars. Look at WWII or Vietnam or Korea and you will see collateral damage on a very huge scale. As long as there is war there will be civilian's that get caught in the crossfire. And it doesn't matter if it's the U.S., Pakistan, India, China, or Russia doing the fighting.

What irks some are the people with agendas. Including many on this site that want to use this sad reality of war. And accuse the side that goes out of its way more then any other country of war crimes.

As far as the thread video all major wars have small numbers of soldiers that oppose it. If you talk to the average soldier in the field though they realize why we are there. And while they would like to be home. They also don't want to leave with out stability being brought. The problem comes not from the soldiers but the politicians. Just like Obama’s current move to go against what his field commanders are telling him needs to happen. For me the 2012 elections can't come fast enough so we can vote that man out of office.

it's understood, civilian casualties are unavoidable.
What pissed me off was the reaction given by gambit.

A sort of 'don't know, don't care', turning a blind eye too it and looking at the brighter side.
 
.

Latest posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom