What's new

The Real Story on Iran, US, Russia and China

TaiShang

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Apr 30, 2014
Messages
27,848
Reaction score
70
Country
China
Location
Taiwan, Province Of China
The Real Story on Iran, US, Russia and China / Sputnik International

The real story is, and will continue to be, how Iran, the key power in Southwest Asia, is about to be positioned in the nonstop complex ballet between the US, Russia and China. That’s one of the key vectors of the New Great Game in Eurasia.


The real story was never about how warmonger Israeli Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu, a foreign leader, would crudely use the House of Cards, sorry, the US Capitol, as a lowly re-election bully pulpit to mould the US presidency and American foreign policy.

A graphic indication is that while “Bomb Iran” Bibi was distilling his 39-minute harangue in Washington, US Secretary of State John Kerry and Iranian Foreign Minister Javad Zarif were engaged in their third round of nuclear negotiations in Montreux.

The real story is also only partially about this perennial soap opera — the Iranian nuclear dossier. By the end of this month there will be a deadline to reach a framework agreement, and by June – optimistically – a comprehensive final settlement.

What’s at stake at the highest level has been known to all major players for ages. Tehran won’t settle for anything less than a swift end to the current nasty, illegal package of sanctions. Yet Washington, under the cloud of the self-described "Don’t Do Stupid Stuff" Obama administration, keeps changing the goal posts as negotiations advance.

The latest is a demand by Obama for a 10-year suspension of Iranian nuclear activity. Zarif called it "illogical" and "excessive".

Well, as illogical as the trademark paranoia exhibited by the usual basket of US neo-cons and extreme right-wingers. Compare it to how Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei regards nuclear power – with all its implications; this has also been on the recordfor ages for anyone to see.

China, Russia and Plan B

Unlike the Cheney regime, the Obama administration seems to have reached a logical conclusion – facilitated by extensive Pentagon gaming; Washington can’t destroy Iran’s nuclear program – unless it would use nuclear weapons.

Along most of the past decade, that was Plan A. Plan B is the never-ending "negotiations", which boils down to placing a series of restrictions on Iran’s nuclear program in exchange for a still very dubious end of sanctions.

Yet the real objective of the Masters of the Universe who control the shadowplay in the Washington/Wall Street axis is to manage imperial decline. That implies, in Southwest Asia, a renewed Divide and Rule push, featuring Turkey, Iran, Saudi Arabia and Israel.

Some key players in Washington are getting increasingly impatient with the House of Saud – what with its low price oil strategy bombing the US shale oil industry. Others worry that Turkey – after a key Pipelineistan deal, the Turk Stream – is moving away to Russia. Thus the option to sort of reintegrate Iran into a collaboration with the West, if not close, at least yielding profitable deals for Western corporations.

Meanwhile, Russia and China are not standing idly, as they are an important part of the P5+1 negotiating team with Iran. Both BRICS nations can – and do — use Iran as leverage in how they negotiate with the hegemon, always finding ways to undermine the US "pivoting to Asia".

As soon as relations with Iran are normalized, Tehran will be admitted to the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO); currently it enjoys observer status. Washington dreads the move – as it will advance Iran’s Eurasian integration, and solidify a Moscow-Tehran-Beijing political/commercial axis.

Russia already does very good business with Iran – from nuclear plants to weapons sales. No US deal with Iran will come through without a tacit Russian acquiescence – and the Americans know it. Beijing, for its part, tends to cling to the status quo – as in not desiring Tehran to get any closer to the West because that would mean a freer hegemon in its "pivoting to Asia" mode, which China, correctly, identifies as containment.

Further on down the road, Tehran can use a rapprochement with the West to increase its bargaining power with Beijing. Assuming a deal is reached this summer, Tehran will be in an excellent position to extract concessions – on the economy, security, defense – from its Chinese partners. But the name of the game remains Eurasian integration.

The Caliphate, "our" bastards

As for vociferous Bibi, all he had left was to once again try to sell Washington an Israeli war of choice against a demonized-to-oblivion Iran. It didn’t fly – as much as those usual suspects, the AIPAC lobby, bluntly ordered their shock troops to tell the House of Cards, sorry US Congress, that war is peace, and any nuclear deal is a deal with the devil. As argued by Trita Parsi, the real "existential threat" for Bibi is peace.

Once again, the real story here is not a nuclear Iran; it’s the possibility of a US-Iran détente where Israel’s grip on US foreign policy is not ironclad anymore.

Predictably, Bibi lumped as evil forces lurking in his "neighborhoo" everyone from Iran and "Lebanon" (he meant Hezbollah) to Assad’s Syria and Hamas. But not ISIS/ISIL/Daesh. So a non-nuclear Iran is a worse threat to civilization than the fake, beheading-addicted Caliphate.

Espousing such a worldview Bibi would not even qualify as an extra on House of Cards – the one on Netflix. Meanwhile, the real Israel story – the illegal occupation/apartheid imposed on Palestine – continues, obscured by the usual gaggle of somnambulists in the Bibi-raided House of Cards, sorry, US Congress.



Read more: The Real Story on Iran, US, Russia and China / Sputnik International
 
The Real Story on Iran, US, Russia and China / Sputnik International

The real story is, and will continue to be, how Iran, the key power in Southwest Asia, is about to be positioned in the nonstop complex ballet between the US, Russia and China. That’s one of the key vectors of the New Great Game in Eurasia.


The real story was never about how warmonger Israeli Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu, a foreign leader, would crudely use the House of Cards, sorry, the US Capitol, as a lowly re-election bully pulpit to mould the US presidency and American foreign policy.

A graphic indication is that while “Bomb Iran” Bibi was distilling his 39-minute harangue in Washington, US Secretary of State John Kerry and Iranian Foreign Minister Javad Zarif were engaged in their third round of nuclear negotiations in Montreux.

The real story is also only partially about this perennial soap opera — the Iranian nuclear dossier. By the end of this month there will be a deadline to reach a framework agreement, and by June – optimistically – a comprehensive final settlement.

What’s at stake at the highest level has been known to all major players for ages. Tehran won’t settle for anything less than a swift end to the current nasty, illegal package of sanctions. Yet Washington, under the cloud of the self-described "Don’t Do Stupid Stuff" Obama administration, keeps changing the goal posts as negotiations advance.

The latest is a demand by Obama for a 10-year suspension of Iranian nuclear activity. Zarif called it "illogical" and "excessive".

Well, as illogical as the trademark paranoia exhibited by the usual basket of US neo-cons and extreme right-wingers. Compare it to how Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei regards nuclear power – with all its implications; this has also been on the recordfor ages for anyone to see.

China, Russia and Plan B

Unlike the Cheney regime, the Obama administration seems to have reached a logical conclusion – facilitated by extensive Pentagon gaming; Washington can’t destroy Iran’s nuclear program – unless it would use nuclear weapons.

Along most of the past decade, that was Plan A. Plan B is the never-ending "negotiations", which boils down to placing a series of restrictions on Iran’s nuclear program in exchange for a still very dubious end of sanctions.

Yet the real objective of the Masters of the Universe who control the shadowplay in the Washington/Wall Street axis is to manage imperial decline. That implies, in Southwest Asia, a renewed Divide and Rule push, featuring Turkey, Iran, Saudi Arabia and Israel.

Some key players in Washington are getting increasingly impatient with the House of Saud – what with its low price oil strategy bombing the US shale oil industry. Others worry that Turkey – after a key Pipelineistan deal, the Turk Stream – is moving away to Russia. Thus the option to sort of reintegrate Iran into a collaboration with the West, if not close, at least yielding profitable deals for Western corporations.

Meanwhile, Russia and China are not standing idly, as they are an important part of the P5+1 negotiating team with Iran. Both BRICS nations can – and do — use Iran as leverage in how they negotiate with the hegemon, always finding ways to undermine the US "pivoting to Asia".

As soon as relations with Iran are normalized, Tehran will be admitted to the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO); currently it enjoys observer status. Washington dreads the move – as it will advance Iran’s Eurasian integration, and solidify a Moscow-Tehran-Beijing political/commercial axis.

Russia already does very good business with Iran – from nuclear plants to weapons sales. No US deal with Iran will come through without a tacit Russian acquiescence – and the Americans know it. Beijing, for its part, tends to cling to the status quo – as in not desiring Tehran to get any closer to the West because that would mean a freer hegemon in its "pivoting to Asia" mode, which China, correctly, identifies as containment.

Further on down the road, Tehran can use a rapprochement with the West to increase its bargaining power with Beijing. Assuming a deal is reached this summer, Tehran will be in an excellent position to extract concessions – on the economy, security, defense – from its Chinese partners. But the name of the game remains Eurasian integration.

The Caliphate, "our" bastards

As for vociferous Bibi, all he had left was to once again try to sell Washington an Israeli war of choice against a demonized-to-oblivion Iran. It didn’t fly – as much as those usual suspects, the AIPAC lobby, bluntly ordered their shock troops to tell the House of Cards, sorry US Congress, that war is peace, and any nuclear deal is a deal with the devil. As argued by Trita Parsi, the real "existential threat" for Bibi is peace.

Once again, the real story here is not a nuclear Iran; it’s the possibility of a US-Iran détente where Israel’s grip on US foreign policy is not ironclad anymore.

Predictably, Bibi lumped as evil forces lurking in his "neighborhoo" everyone from Iran and "Lebanon" (he meant Hezbollah) to Assad’s Syria and Hamas. But not ISIS/ISIL/Daesh. So a non-nuclear Iran is a worse threat to civilization than the fake, beheading-addicted Caliphate.

Espousing such a worldview Bibi would not even qualify as an extra on House of Cards – the one on Netflix. Meanwhile, the real Israel story – the illegal occupation/apartheid imposed on Palestine – continues, obscured by the usual gaggle of somnambulists in the Bibi-raided House of Cards, sorry, US Congress.



Read more: The Real Story on Iran, US, Russia and China / Sputnik International
Indeed a very nice article, but you need to change the title into "The real story on how Iran is being played like a little puppet, by US, China and Russia"
 
Indeed a very nice article, but you need to change the title into "The real story on how Iran is being played like a little puppet, by US, China and Russia"

Iran is being played by nobody. In fact, amid the turmoil in the Middle East, it has shown it is a master strategist by turning the tide in Syria and Iraq without getting too much bogged down in it.

As for the nuclear deal, there is nothing wrong with sitting on a table and negotiating with the stakeholders of global community. The fact that Obama is a lame duck and lost majority in both wings of the Congress is just a historical accident that has nothing to do with Iran.

If you want to see real little puppets, look no further than the Gulf and the Asia Minor.
 
Indeed a very nice article, but you need to change the title into "The real story on how Iran is being played like a little puppet, by US, China and Russia"

Marriage has negative effects !!!
-2-28-.gif
 
Iran is being played by nobody. In fact, amid the turmoil in the Middle East, it has shown it is a master strategist by turning the tide in Syria and Iraq without getting too much bogged down in it.

As for the nuclear deal, there is nothing wrong with sitting on a table and negotiating with the stakeholders of global community. The fact that Obama is a lame duck and lost majority in both wings of the Congress is just a historical accident that has nothing to do with Iran.

If you want to see real little puppets, look no further than the Gulf and the Asia Minor.
Marriage has negative effects !!!
Do not lay the blame on me, I just summarized the key point of the very same article:
Russia already does very good business with Iran – from nuclear plants to weapons sales. No US deal with Iran will come through without a tacit Russian acquiescence – and the Americans know it. Beijing, for its part, tends to cling to the status quo – as in not desiring Tehran to get any closer to the West because that would mean a freer hegemon in its "pivoting to Asia" mode, which China, correctly, identifies as containment.
Meanwhile, Russia and China are not standing idly, as they are an important part of the P5+1 negotiating team with Iran. Both BRICS nations can – and do — use Iran as leverage in how they negotiate with the hegemon, always finding ways to undermine the US "pivoting to Asia".
 
That is not being a little puppy. Little puppies have no influence on the way regional/global dynamics are shaped since their foreign policy is controlled by a nation or a bloc.

Iran's foreign policy is acutely sovereign and independent. In the larger scheme of things, nations seem to be grouping together, and using their collective power as a leverage against their perceived opponents.

But the problem is, even within a (loosely-knitted) bloc, there is various interests. China, Iran and Russia see eye to eye with respect to Iran's rightful position within the global (not necessarily Western) community. China-US relations might be different from Iran-US relations.

In this respect, it is realpolitik for nations to use their collective leverage power against their individual competitor.
 
You are describing the situation as you like it, not as the reality is.
Little puppies have no influence on the way regional/global dynamics are shaped since their foreign policy is controlled by a nation or a bloc
How come is that the meaning of being a puppet, a small soldier in a chess game, surely has some " influence on the way regional/global dynamics are shaped " but it is also truly called a small puppet, no matter how much of a " sovereign and independent" it feels.
Iran being played as a tool of leverage by China and Russia in their approach toward forming/shaping a hegemony is not a mutual cooperation of some sovereign nations, no matter how much you try to sugar coat it.
 
LOL Dude nothing bad happenss to the bad guys on earth only the good suffeers. You are a little throat that will be cut in name of destroying the biig guys brain.(china without energy is a waste) fatal boom will be chinas invade with laser supported no care off nukes country US. Iranians robb their techology.
 
LOL Dude nothing bad happenss to the bad guys on earth only the good suffeers. You are a little throat that will be cut in name of destroying the biig guys brain.(china without energy is a waste) fatal boom will be chinas invade with laser supported no care off nukes country US. Iranians robb their techology.

I didn't understand even one word of what you are trying to say. Am I suffering from lack English comprehension skills or what?

How come is that the meaning of being a puppet, a small soldier in a chess game, surely has some " influence on the way regional/global dynamics are shaped " but it is also truly called a small puppet, no matter how much of a " sovereign and independent" it feels.
Iran being played as a tool of leverage by China and Russia in their approach toward forming/shaping a hegemony is not a mutual cooperation of some sovereign nations, no matter how much you try to sugar coat it.

The way you describe it, every country on earth is somehow a puppet of big powers. The size of puppets differ though. I don't agree with Iran being puppet of China and Russia, but I do agree that sanctions limited our choices in some ways and with help of internal corruption and corrupted officials, it seemed like we are their puppets. But that's not the case in reality. When you are a puppet, you take orders from your master and you change even your main policies as your master pleases.
 
Last edited:
Learn english at upper intermediate degree. Iranoblind.
 
Sorry man ii didnt want to hurt you.
 
Back
Top Bottom