What's new

The most advanced army of the world

will be different if you read russian or chinese version of wiki.

P.S..there is a difference between " cant " and dont.
both china and russia have long range nuclear submarines loaded with cruise missiles....long range strategic bombers...so yes they can bomb a few poor countries ... blaming them of something without proof...
but they dont.

wiki is not an US site and its views are not biased, anyone can edit information on wikipedia...even u......why do u think that americans have manipulated everything to favour them???
 
...why do u think that americans have manipulated everything to favour them???

because they can? ;)
the debate was not about portraying an average american as manipulative crook..
its about how your government has fooled you and the rest of the world by posing as flag beareres of democracy and freedom...while robbing you off your money through banking system and robbing the rest of the world through imposed wars.
 
There is a reason why these videos are called propaganda. They show only one side of the story and have an agenda, which is to target the subject of their biased documentary. If you look on the web for video clips regarding the military or soldiers of Pakistan, Afghanistan, India, Iran or any other country, you will find similar videos, but does that mean these videos draw an accurate and complete picture? No, they do not and hence should not be judged as such.

It is naïve to believe that each and every “western media”, which is extremely diverse in their coverage, their outlook, their objectivity and subjectivity, would all be “hell bent” on hiding “facts”. We have freedom of speech and press in the United States which allows individuals to make videos such as these and voice their opinion. To some extent the same can be said about the media of many western countries. The opinions and actions of a few do not reflect the opinion, mindset, and actions of the entire country, or military. We hold our soldiers accountable for their actions and they are expected to uphold the highest Code of Conduct embedded in our military society. It is completely untrue to state that the U.S. military or the media tries to hide incidents such as these. Long before the Kill Team report was published; those 12 individuals were already being charged for their crimes. The actions of those individuals were, as we have said before, repugnant and contradictory to the Uniform Code of Military Justice and Rules of Engagement. Unfortunately, these extremely rare and horrible crimes are used as propaganda by terrorists and extremists to stir hatred among people.

MAJ T.G. Taylor,
DET – U.S Central Command
U.S. Central Command
 
It’s not a case of physical size of one’s military, it’s a case of PROJECTION of that MILITARYPOWER.

The Red Chinese may have a crap-load of short and medium range aircraft and coastal sea craft but can they work all seven seas at the same time with support systems in place? No.

Can the N. Koreans? They would be afraid that entire ships crews would defect because their military may be their elite, but they are still starving. They may have nukes but they have a drastically finite resource set for weapons delivery.

The US can and does routinely operate globally.
As do the Brits, the French and even the Russians, (though their mission scope had diminished since the fall of the Soviet Union).
I know that this was a quickly typed query... but can you please proof read before submitting your questions?
Air Force is two words (I take that personally since I was an Airman, once upon a time).
Navy should be capitalized (I don't even like squids - LOL)
 
Back
Top Bottom