Koreans are genetically tone-deaf; all Southeast Asian and Chinese ethnic groups are tone-sensitive and speak tonal languages. Koreans cannot be from Southeast Asia.
There is no trail of O2B from Southeast Asia through China to Manchuria. O2B is exclusively Manchurian in origin and distribution.
O3A carriers are later day migrants. Native Tibetan haplotype is D1.
That's the only case, don't talk if you don't know facts.
Africa can't be china because it don't have continues electricity supply, big ports, good roads, skilled but cheap labor and other infrastructure, stable govt. etc. etc.
Just build everything mentioned above African can replace china easily.
Maybe not Africa, but Vietnam is a good candidate for multinationals to relocate.Just build everything mentioned above African can replace china easily.
Why should we stop stocking the Altaic fact?
1. Silla is 1/4th of Korea.
Everybody agrees to that except Han Chinese, who insist Manchus are Chinese, to the great fury of Manchus.
KBS is far far more reputable than CCTV.
Nobody ever claimed that Manchus were Korean, although they used to live in Korean territories.
Slightly different. Manchus do look completely different from Chinese though.
No, Kims are Scythians/Xianbeis from Central Asia.
So which culture does Korean culture look like?
So which language did Koreans burrow? Evenki?
People laugh at your so called facts.
Because Silla was only 1/4th of Korean area, and the center of politics shifted to Kaesung 180 years later, a city founded by refugees from Pyongyang, the capital of Koryo(aka Koguryo), who called their new country Koryo.
O2B, only found among Manchurian ethnic groups, is called the "Korean marker".
Yes please do that.
Why should we stop stocking the Altaic fact?
The closest language to Korean is Evenki, which you know well to be an Altaic language.
1. Silla is 1/4th of Korea.
2. Kims, as DNA evidence shows, are Scythians.
Everybody agrees to that except Han Chinese, who insist Manchus are Chinese, to the great fury of Manchus.
KBS is far far more reputable than CCTV.
Nobody ever claimed that Manchus were Korean, although they used to live in Korean territories.
Slightly different. Manchus do look completely different from Chinese though.
No, Kims are Scythians/Xianbeis from Central Asia.
The rest are Siberian.
So which culture does Korean culture look like?
You see, when Chinese "burrow" something they look very much like the originals; like Chinese copy jetfighters that look like Russian Flankers, Chinese bullet trains that looks like Japanese Shinkanses, Chery QQ that looks like Daewoo Matiz, iPones that looks like iPhones, etc.
So if Korean culture is "burrowed" like you claim, then it should look like the original, right? So which culture on earth looks like Korean?
I rest my case.
So which language did Koreans burrow? Evenki?
People laugh at your so called facts.
Because Silla was only 1/4th of Korean area, and the center of politics shifted to Kaesung 180 years later, a city founded by refugees from Pyongyang, the capital of Koryo(aka Koguryo), who called their new country Koryo.
O2B, only found among Manchurian ethnic groups, is called the "Korean marker".
Yes please do that.
1. Why is Han Chinese rebutting on behalf of Manchus?
2. Why is this Han Chinese rebutting on things never claimed?
Right, bro , More investors soon will come to VN in particular and ASEAN in general due to high labour cost in CHina
Vietnam Investment Review - Business - Textile producers turn to Vietnam
so which other culture looks like Korean culture? Why can't you answer this simple question?
Who claims that Central Asians are Koreans, other than Chinese?
I am tired of asking the same question for the millionth time; whose culture looks like Korean culture? Why do you make a fool out of yourself in front of your Pakistani friends? Even they can see the BS that you are spewing out.
Actually the superiority complex. Koreans do not hide the fact that they belittle China, and this is the source of all the anti-Korea feelings in China.
Russia and the US are Korea's friend.
A person of lower intellect cannot convince a person of a superior intellect.
It's the national broadcaster like NHK in Japan.
Koreans are unpopular among Chinese and Japanese men(Not Japanese women), it's a well-known fact. Likewise Chinese are disliked by Japanese and Koreans. Japanese in turn are disliked by Koreans and Chinese. In other word, everyone hates everybody else.
Good, invite him to join in.
Invasion of Korea is out of question, as JGSDF(Ground force) members training in mock combat in Korea fared badly and 2CHers blasting JGSDF for being useless tax-wasters. JMSDF is another matter entirely and Japanese would like to keep their battles at the see where they hold a major advantage.
That reply was addressed to an Indian person. You wouldn't get it since you are not Indian.
A question for you.
That's funny, since Japanese say Korea looks like Japan of the 80s while Japan's engine broke down and Japan is going nowhere.
Ask your fellow Southeast Asian friends this question. "Do you want your country to be like independent Vietnam, or "US dominated" Japan and Korea?"
Chinese nukes are useless because China too gets nuked if it uses nukes. And China was about to get nuked by the Soviets in 1969 if it weren't for Richard Nixon's intervention.
Korea has a great relationship with Russia. This is why Russia is eager to sell PAK-FA to Korea, an item that China can't buy.
If this is what being an hostage is like, then so be it. Seems that all the US hostages are doing well, while citizens of free countries like Vietnam and China are struggling with poverty.
Maybe that's the reason why Japanese and Koreans can enter the US visa-free, while Chinese and Vietnamese need to stand at a mile-long visa line at US embassies for visas with 10% probability of getting.
