THE indian subcontinent colonisation - whose fault is it?

[Azadkashmir]

The British took over and ruled the Indian subcontinent because of greedy traitors and incompetent ppl.
Who would you blame? the muslim or the hindu or both were traitors and incompetent.
The Chinese teach in school the hundred years of humiliation.
The indian - some say it was great under British we were free from evil Muslim and some hate british and cheer the resistance.
pakistani - .............nothing

 

[doorstar]

bengali "muslims" look up siraj daulah whose armies switched over to east india trading company
BTW Britain saved you from extinction
PS.
Britain never took present day Pakistan from "muslims" they liberated it from the heirs of kana singh ranjeet

 

[Old School]

Britain is still ruling the sub-continent through her slaves who are trained in Britain. They run the bureaucracy , court house , military, banks , universities everything. Even the penal code still remains the same. Stupid left lane driving is there too. London is still the Qibla for these slaves. Majority people are still the same primitive jahils. This is the bitter truth. Jahils will always be ruled by others and still blame others for their misfortune.

 

[Kamikaze Pilot]

pakistani - .............nothing

What history do they teach to kids in Pakistani schools then?

- PRTP GWD

 

[Hiptullha]

British rule was just the case of on imperial ruler ousting another. You can't call any actor a traitor because the subcontinent has always been a collection of different nations. As for Indians, they should be grateful that the British came and helped crystallize an Indian and Hindu identity otherwise they'd still be fighting over drinking wells with the 27 other castes in their backwater designated shitting village.

 

[Bilal9]

British rule was just the case of on imperial ruler ousting another. You can't call any actor a traitor because the subcontinent has always been a collection of different nations. As for Indians, they should be grateful that the British came and helped crystallize an Indian and Hindu identity otherwise they'd still be fighting over drinking wells with the 27 other castes in their backwater designated shitting village.

The British did not try to fight the Punjabis or Sindhis.

They came to Bengal (meaning current West Bengal), where people are polite and non-confrontational. Some would say people not fit for military leadership or resistance. A soft underbelly, if you will.

Bengal Subah was ruled mostly by people from Murshidabad, which was already a corrupt administration financed by Hindu financiers like Umi Chand in Calcutta. Bahadur Shah Zafar in Delhi was the last flicker of Mughal empire and though Siraj-ud-Dowlah put up a brave fight, he could not win against the corrupt schemers and financiers like Umi-Chand, who made sure the British had the upper hand in money and resources.

Omichund - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

The body of Mughal empire and Bengal Subah was already in the coffin - the British just put the final nail in it and nailed it shut.

 

[Azadkashmir]

What history do they teach to kids in Pakistani schools then?

- PRTP GWD

i dont know even here in uk all i learnt was there was world war n Britain won and everyone went home.

 

[El Sidd]

Lack of naval power and an isolationist foreign policy of the Mughal federation.

 

[AbuzarIlyas]

The imperialist powers of Europe are still exploiting the resources of the world through overt or covert means. One example is Burkina Faso where people are being incentivized to do gold mining in return of 20-30 euros per day. French players are involved who purchase that gold and in return give cocaine to the local miners and get half of that gold money back from their pockets...

Hindustan was also being exploited for more than 100 years through dozens of alike means by Britishers. Americas are also an example where these europeans showed their mercilessness.