What's new

The Indian Government Might Fall

I agree. MM Singh has managed to put 12 parties together in a coalition and make it work for India and here in Pakistan, we have a useless xxxxxxx of a King maker (Zardari) and his idiotic cohort Nawaz Sharif who can't get two parties together for the sake of Pakistan's stability and prosperity. This is what happens when one or two think that the country is their personal fiefdom:tdown:.
I think this sword cuts both ways. In some ways India seems to have a bit too much democracy where it may in fact be costing them critical setbacks in the nation building process. While it is remarkable that virtually every segment of society has representation in some form or the other, it may not necessarily be effective for all of them to be in a national coalition government where absolutely nothing gets done.

Although I don't think there is any threat destabilization, all of these collapsing governments and repeat elections seems to cost way too much time, money and progress for it to be worth it.
 
.
India is in a political chaos, but still holding!!

The Communists have always been treacherous and so it is no new thing!

Yet, I have to grudgingly concede that they have a point. Why is the govt so shy of showing them or the nation the text of the Agreement with the IAEA?

Is the issue with the agreement with the IAEA or the US? Be grateful that despite the political chaos the ship's afloat in India. Unfortunately I can't say the same about Pakistan or to be exact may not be able to say so in the near future given the way things are unfolding.
 
.
Good.
In such turbulent times it is good that India remains stable. We have a financial and food crisis rearing its head. We need states in the region to remain stable.
Araz

The coming or going of a geovernment doesn't reflect on the stability of India.

Indian institutions are strong enough to handle that. This will not be the first time that a government in a democracy doesn't complete the full term.

Hardly anything to be stirred up about!
 
.
rime Minister Dr Manmohan Singh [Images] may have gone out on a limb, even risking his government's four-year long association with the Left parties, over the Indo-US nuclear deal, all because time was running out on the deal, but it seems that more than India, the clock is ticking for the Bush administration.

The Washington Post reports that while the deal may pass its hurdles in India but it won't be so lucky in US Congress. That is because the Hyde Act of 2006, which gave initial go-ahead to the nuclear deal, requires that US Congress sits in session for 30 continuous days to consider it.

The problem is that US Congress goes into recess in August, before finally adjourning on September 26. In effect, as of now it has less than 40 days left in the session.

For India, two important steps need to be completed. One, it needs to conclude its agreement with the International Atomic Energy Agency, which Dr Singh said will be done soon after his government wins the vote of confidence, and two, secure a nod from the 45-nation Nuclear Suppliers Group which controls the trade in uranium and reactors. It is after these steps are done that the clock begins for India.

The problem is that the IAEA board of governors is expected to take up the matter only in August, while the NSG could take several months to reach a consensus, reports the Post, and quotes Lynne Weil, spokeswoman for the House Foreign Affairs Committee as saying, 'At this point, both [IAEA and NSG actions] have to take place in the next couple of weeks'.

A way out could be holding a lame duck Congress session after the Presidential elections in November, but House speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif) has reiterated that there will not be one, especially if as expected the Democrats gain in the elections.

Given this, it seems likely that the US, and not India, may end up the loser. Once armed with the NSG approval, India can begin nuclear trade with other countries, US administration officials and congressional aides told the Post.

What it means is that countries like France [Images] and Russian can make nuclear sales to India while American companies continue to face restrictions since the congressional approval has not been forthcoming.

Sharon Squassoni, senior associate at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, agrees as much to the Post. 'India doesn't need the US deal at all' after the NSG's approval, Squassoni told the newspaper. 'It was a fatal flaw in the logic of US Congress.'

The irony, in such a situation, is inescapable. The US will not benefit in terms of nuclear trade from the deal it set in motion in July 2005, other nations could. A State Department official admitted as much to the Post when he said, 'I don't believe there is anything to prevent them from doing that, if we don't ratify it.'

But since it involves US business, he was hopeful that US Congress will not prevent them from benefiting. 'It is the hidden force of this agreement. It is US business that sees an opportunity.'

After NSG ok, India doesn't really need the US
 
.
Is the issue with the agreement with the IAEA or the US? Be grateful that despite the political chaos the ship's afloat in India. Unfortunately I can't say the same about Pakistan or to be exact may not be able to say so in the near future given the way things are unfolding.

Rather difficult to answer. I think it is all because the Communist are clients of China.

We are afloat and we will remain so. No thanks to any political party.

Pakistan will also survive. It has survived many a storm.

I have faith in the intrinsic goodness of Pakistan and its people!

Both India and Pakistan will OVERCOME!

Jai Hind and Pakistan Paindabad!
 
.
^^^Salim, while we usually use "Chinese agents" and similar terms to abuse the commies, I hope you realize that this isn't true.

The communists simply have a very rigid outlook towards foreign policy that hasn't changed since the 1950s. They have fossilized their ideas and refuse to bend to accommodate realities.
 
.
^^^Salim, while we usually use "Chinese agents" and similar terms to abuse the commies, I hope you realize that this isn't true.

The communists simply have a very rigid outlook towards foreign policy that hasn't changed since the 1950s. They have fossilized their ideas and refuse to bend to accommodate realities.

The words and the sentiment are not exclusively mine.

It is used in the media as also they have always kept the Chinese interest pre-eminent over national interest throughout history.
 
.
Malay,

I was under the impression that with the SP's support the government was not in any danger, therefore the withdrawal of the left will be reduced to an act of protest high on symbolism and low on effect.

Like PPP and PML-N:lol:
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom