Raj Guru
BANNED
New Recruit
- Joined
- Sep 14, 2015
- Messages
- 50
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
hardcore oneAre u a Shaivite ?
I am a Brahmin too .
Mahadev Har. Brother
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
New Recruit
hardcore oneAre u a Shaivite ?
I am a Brahmin too .
hardcore one
Mahadev Har. Brother
He does have a valid point they will continue to die its not like religious fanatics are killing them , Religious matters are different to these issues no point linking them.
LOL. We have evolved from not wearing clothes to wearing them today. People progress. This is natural. Just that we stayed naked and had no society at one point of time does not mean we have to go back to those days. This is assuming that beef was a part of Dharma. Which it never was. But that is besides the point.
I think you have got a wrong idea about this, Hinduism is not like Islam; there is no death for apostasy and you can be an atheist and Hindu at the same time.The widely accepted belief in this world is that the Brahmins have been Vegetarians. But, now, a few researches say that Brahmins were beef eaters in ancient times. Hindu organizations condemn it saying that it’s not true. Well, What if Ancient Brahmins Were Perfect Beef Eaters? Why they ate and why they shunned? A spotlight on that would unleash many facts that speak about our background. Many know that it’s accepted for Brahmins in Bengal and Orissa to eat fish, calling it ‘Jala Pushpam’.
History clearly reveals that Brahmins were Non Vegetarians and perfect beef eaters. The respective animal sacrifice followed by Aswamedha and Gomedha Yagas is not merely for ‘bali’ sake but also for naivedyam (offering to divine power) and prasadam (holy food).
@fakhre mirpur
Here is a curtain raiser that starts with a quote from a former Brahmin President of India.
Sarvepalli Radhakrishna, in his ‘Religion and Society’ said,“In ancient times meat was used by the Brahmins also. The old Vedic religion included the sacrifices of five kinds of animals: goats, sheep, cows, bulls and horses. Under the influence of Buddhism, Jainism and Viashnavism, the practice became discredited. Manu and Yagnavalkya impose so many restrictions about meat eating that they discourage it”.
Bhagavadgeetha says,“Chaturvarnyam maya sristam Guna Karma Vibhagasah”, means the Lord says,‘I have formed the four classes basing on the traits and duties’-
As an extension to this, Manu says,“Brahmanah Kshatriyo Vaisyas trayo varna dvijatayah- Chaturtha ekajatis sudro nasti tu panchamah…”, which means,“Brahmin, Kshatriya, Vysya and Sudra are the four classes and there’s no fifth class”. This confirms that there was no so-called fifth class as per Hindu Dharma. But without the concept of fifth-class theory, Manu would not have mentioned about it in his text. A few consequences made a set of people fall in the name of ‘5th class’. What are those consequences that made BrahminsVegetarians and formed ‘5th class’ for a set of other people?
In very ancient India- Brahmins, Kshatriyas and Madigas were the three prominent castes in Hinduism. Yagas with animal sacrifice were widely performed in those days and hence these three castes turned prominent.Brahmins with hymns, Kshatriyas with financial muscle and Madigas with their skill of skinning out the flesh of an animal- turned the key people in religion. Other community people were mere spectators of the yaga with no big place to participate in it. The animal that was slaughtered was regarded ‘holy food’. That used to be cooked and distributed for all.
With these regular activities the three castes used to enjoy same standard of social status, like that of today’s ‘Forward Castes’. The food habits of these communities were also common and hence there was no line drawn between them. The people among the communities also used to get united with marriages. Even mythology says that Vasista, the Brahmin Rishi marriedArundhati, an outcast girl. Similarly Goutama, the Brahmin Rishi married Ahalya, another lowest caste girl. All that happened in that ancient time.
Restrictions in Vedic Literature
In a hymn of the RgVeda it is said that “Indra will eat thy bulls.”[2] In another hymn of the RgVeda[3] Agni is styled Uksanna and Vasanna i.e.“eater of bullsand barren cows.” Not only for the purpose of sacrifices but for food also, the bovine species were killed in regular slaughter-houses and this is evident from another hymn of the RgVeda.[4] Again, it is suggested in the RgVeda that the cow was cut up with a sword or axe.[5] It is interesting to note in this context that the modern Hindu practice of Jhatka-bali, that is, severing the head of the animal at one stroke, had not yet come into fashion. There are ample evidences how the Rgvedic people were fond of beef-eating. Even in funeral ceremony beef-eating was considered an essential part.[6]
Interestingly enough in the same Veda the cow is sometimes considered inviolable as indicated by her designation aghnya (‘not to be slain’) which occurs sixteen times in the entire RgVeda,[7] as opposed to three instances of aghnya[8](masculine). But this fact cannot be regarded as showing that beef-eating was condemned in the Rgvedic period. In this connection, we should point out that the Sanskrit word used for the sacrificial cow is Vasa (i.e.‘sterile cow’) and a milch cow was seldom sacrificed.[9] It is only in this way that one can explain the lavish praise bestowed on the cow in the RgVeda where she is described in a number of hymns as “the mother of Rudras, the daughter of the vasus, the sister of Adityas, and the centre of nectar.”[10]
Yeah we have no issues with pigs being culled they are a nuisance anywayThe thread source is a crap and a clear misunderstanding of the texts.
Do googling to understand the real interpretation of the texts.
Majority's feelings in India have to be respected.
Will Pakistanis tolerate someone mass butchering Pigs in their country ?
This is how i and most omnivores see it why impose your view on them?Many animal species facing extinction - thenews.com.pk
Islam is a complete code of life which is why everywhere it spreads, the land turns into a desert.
Desertification in Pakistan - The Express Tribune
The paltry forest cover reduced to 2% of the total landmass because you guys are so environmentally friendly and have lives so in harmony with nature.
Earthly matters: Can Pakistan’s forests be saved? - Newspaper - DAWN.COM
Bad pagan Hindus with a population of 1.3 billion still increasing forest cover in their land to 24% of the total landmass and going towards 33% in a decade.
For those who try to say Hindus do not have religious significance for cows, this is the image of cows all Hindus grew up with.
The Sacredness of the Holy Cow
No, you missed my point. There are so many retards in India who whine about their religions and fantasies and try to mix their beliefs into politics, while you wont even see them investing 1 % of their energy into the REAL WORLD issues which actually matter:
Like sanitation, health care, traffic safety etc etc etc... The issues which make India a 3rd world nation where thousands still die due to simple diseases, malnutrition, needless accidents etc etc etc...
But as long as they have ridiculous cow laws or a gigantic 10 crore church next to a road without traffic lights everything is fine and they can continue living in their delusions
I pity your world view....
This is an image for a Muslim
This is an image for a Muslim
Do you know the difference between a Bigot and a normal Indian ?
When kerala Bigots held "beef party", Muslims in UP held "Milk Party"
]
At least I have a view, you are Blind............ from your Hate.
LOL....... so the problems in India like diseases, malnutrition, needless accidents are due to Cow Laws ?