the greenhouse effect, total junk science

[ultron]

 

[ultron]

Energy cannot be created or destroyed. Energy can only be converted from mass or converted from other forms of energy. Greenhouse gases in the air are not sources of heat. Therefore they do not increase Earth's temperature. Think about that. And think about the theory of greenhouse effect. It's pretty clear why the title is appropriate

A greenhouse is not warmer than outside because of the glass. The glass is not a source of heat, so the glass cannot add heat to a greenhouse. The only reason a greenhouse is warmer than the outside is because the operator adds heat to it through the use of a generator and light sources.

If anyone can increase Earth's temperature using a non heating source, give that person a Nobel prize because surely he / she would have debunked the law of the conservation of energy

 

[gangsta_rap]

If anyone can increase Earth's temperature using a non heating source, give that person a Nobel prize because surely he / she would have debunked the law of the conservation of energy

The energy going inside the greenhouse is transient. That means that it gets stored (Capacitance). No laws are broken.
Now here you are talking about how climate change is a hoax.

You should stick to your talk about the aryan russians and thick indo european beards rather than dealing with topics that you have difficulty comprehending.

 

[ultron]

The energy going inside the greenhouse is transient. That means that it gets stored (Capacitance). No laws are broken.
Now here you are talking about how climate change is a hoax.

You should stick to your talk about the aryan russians and thick indo european beards rather than dealing with topics that you have difficulty comprehending.

Climate always changes. Nothing mankind can do about nature.

 

[Wave]

Climate always changes. Nothing mankind can do about nature.

If a nuclear holocaust where to happen right now, would the resulting climate change be natural?

 

[calmDown@all]

well speaking in simple terms what i think is if
BBC - Intermediate 2 Bitesize Geography - World Population Distribution : Revision
World human population - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The world population in 35,000 BCE is estimated to have been around 3 million people, all of whom subsisted as hunter-gatherers.[27] The population had increased to around 15 million at the time agriculture emerged in around 10,000 BCE.[28] By contrast, it is estimated that around 50–60 million people lived in the combined eastern and western Roman Empire in the 4th century CE.[29]
which means as there was a togetherness of human species in large no. around time which means as more & more people or human came into existence they created pressure over atmosphere through excess utilization of oxygen which intern created pressure over atmospheric cycle

that also means to create balance oxygen was to be suplied at that point meaning or resulting in a hole in ozone layer from the point were it was least needed

 

[ultron]

The world population in 35,000 BCE is estimated to have been around 3 million people

What?! 35,000 BCE there were like 50,000 people.

If a nuclear holocaust where to happen right now, would the resulting climate change be natural?

A nuclear holocaust is too puny to affect climate. The world detonates thousands of nuclear bombs every day with nuclear fission energy to generate electricity, with no impact on climate.

 

[calmDown@all]

What?! 35,000 BCE there were like 50,000 people

40,000—35,000 BC

• First human inhabitants in Perth, Australia, as evidenced by archaeological findings on the Upper Swan River.[13]
• In this time period, Melbourne, Australia was occupied by hunter-gatherers.[14][15]
• Early cultural center in the Swabian Alps, earliest figurative art (Venus of Schelklingen), beginning of the Aurignacian
• The first flutes appear in Germany
• Lion-Human created from Hohlenstein-Stadel. It is now in Ulmer Museum, Ulm, Germany
• might be these speculations were for a limited area

 

[ultron]

 

[ultron]