What's new

The great game comes to Bangladesh

US Aircraft carriers 11 and china has 0. Our biggest exporter is the US and the EU, while we have a big deficit with china USA > China. Let us not get ahead of ourselves:lol:....US economy has always had recessions and always bounced back stronger. As long as the world's reserve currency is the US dollar, it is untouchable. US has military base all over the world, if anything it is only increasing. The declining US power is nothing but a media hype, nothing at all. One has to work at the wall street to know how strong the US is. If big brothers wants someone, no one stops him.

"Everyone imposes his own system as far as his army can reach."- Joseph Stalin

Sino-Russian muslim alliance is a pipe dream. I think it was uzbekistan where you can be locked up for hijab and what not. It has been Russia's incluence on uzebekistan, also on chechnya...the ruskies will never have an alliance with the muslims....in fact putin once asked the nato to give russia an invitation to join the nato:lol:

It depends on what time scale you are talking about. If your are talking about 5-10 years then no, but if you are talking about 15-20 years or more, then absolutely yes. Just read some research papers at RAND corp website and it will give you some idea.

On Russia, I agree that they may not like to go for alliance with Muslims, but they may not have a choice, if they do not want to join EU or NATO. Eurasian Union is almost 20-30% Muslim. SCO neighbors Pakistan and Iran are Muslim.

Eventually I think the Rus will go back to the European fold and join EU, considering racial superiority complex of people of European origin. But there are always surprises. Lets see.
 
. .
The visit of Secretary of State Hillary Clinton to Bangladesh on May 5 could be a great disappointment for many in the country if the agenda reflects the perspective of the article displayed below. Bangladeshis do not want to be part of a US-India axis against any third country in the region. ...

Well now that u r one of Dajjal's "chosen ppl" if u declined Dajjal's proposal then get ready for Al-CIAdah making it's roots there & ur own set of suicidals lining up for 72 virgins as brain-washed by Dajjali-clerics ... But if u accepted Dajjal's "will" Dajjal will make ur country into a (false)paradise ... ur call.
 
.
Well now that u r one of Dajjal's "chosen ppl" if u declined Dajjal's proposal then get ready for Al-CIAdah making it's roots there & ur own set of suicidals lining up for 72 virgins as brain-washed by Dajjali-clerics ... But if u accepted Dajjal's "will" Dajjal will make ur country into a (false)paradise ... ur call.

Not much of a choice ......
 
.
East Bengal was there till 1905 Bengal division. In 1947 it was first called East Bengal and then East Pakistan and since 1971 the name changes to Bangladesh, get it? And the dirty hand in the cookie jar was there soon after 1947, hence the usage of the old name. Hope that clears the delusion and confusion.

East Bengal was an non existent entity before 1905.East Bengal was created by Lord Curson in 1905 but this decision was quashed by Lord Harding in favour of Linguistic division in 1912.

Your command over history of your own country is pathetic.


The Usage of Old name for Bangladesh proves your Razakar roots.
 
.
What is this false bogey that you guys keep carrying about India??? Ok lets go by your assumptions - India is influencing your government by your pretense,But its turning out to be good for you - your economy is doing great, you are being given free trade in India, EU, the US, the US(the super power) is looking at you to play a vital role in the bay of Bengal.

India is still hosting millions of your pole vaulters, India is transiting goods thru' BD in return you will earn millions of dollars, Bhutan and Burma are looking to trade with you and are looking to have goods transit thru' BD.

The only if I say so - bad Indian influence is u will become more secular and won't be looking at a seat in the radical Islamic society. Which believe me is not so good for BD's health, what with not having Islamic states surrounding you for your protection and in turn being surrounded by a secular democratic country India. So chin up and welcome to the new and free world and be adaptive. Your people will be more thankful for the better life in store for them in the future.

Ignorant Indians farting out loud again.:lol: You are seeing illusions of Bharmin supa pawa and
thus spewing such bull$****. A pathetic lot you are.
 
.
Ignorant Indians farting out loud again.:lol: You are seeing illusions of Bharmin supa pawa and
thus spewing such bull$****. A pathetic lot you are.

:lol: hey d@ckheads have nothing better to say than the brahmin supah powa or any other random BS, thats the dumb@ss bogey i am talking about in my post.:lol:, India did this to us, RAW is dictating us, we have become a vassal state :blah::blah::blah: Get out of your loony world u pathetic lot.
 
.
East Bengal was an non existent entity before 1905.East Bengal was created by Lord Curson in 1905 but this decision was quashed by Lord Harding in favour of Linguistic division in 1912.

Your command over history of your own country is pathetic.


The Usage of Old name for Bangladesh proves your Razakar roots.

That happed because W.bengali Bharmins didn't want to lose their dominance over Muslim peasants of the East and so they showed crocodile tears of Bengali nationalism but they chose their Bharat mata over their bengali indentity when they were given a option
of an Independent united bengal. You can call him whatever you want but we are proud of our
forefathers for choosing the PAK option in 1947 and taking us out of Bhramin faggotic
grips. E.bengal is part of BD history, who are you to tell us what names we have to use to
represent our country.
 
.
That happed because W.bengali Bharmin faggots didn't want to lose their dominance over Muslim peasants of the East and so they showed crocodile tears of Bengali nationalism but these same
faggots chose their Bharat mata over their bengali indentity when they were given a option
of an Independent united bengal. You can call him whatever you want but we are proud of our
forefathers for choosing the PAK option in 1947 and taking us out of Bhramin faggotic
grips. E.bengal is part of BD history, who are you to tell us what names we have to use to
represent our country.


of course we don't care.but you are distorting history by using "East Bengal"...every countryman fiercely opposed the creation of "East Bengal"..and "East Bengal" was another province of India...after 1947,"East Bengal" doesn't exists..thats why i objected.now...you may Cry about Bengali Bramhins and their conspiracy as much as your lungs permits you.but the truth is,Riot of 1947 shattered all the hope of "United Bengal"..so..read before you make comment.
 
.
of course we don't care.but you are distorting history by using "East Bengal"...every countryman fiercely opposed the creation of "East Bengal"..and "East Bengal" was another province of India...after 1947,"East Bengal" doesn't exists..thats why i objected.now...you may Cry about Bengali Bramhins and their conspiracy as much as your lungs permits you.but the truth is,Riot of 1947 shattered all the hope of "United Bengal"..so..read before you make comment.

Yes it shattered all hopes of an United Bengal in the indian union.:lol: not an Independent United
bengal. The word here is Independent.
 
.
Yes it shattered all hopes of an United Bengal in the indian union.:lol: not an Independent United
bengal. The word here is Independent.

now now...we fought for Independent India...not Independent Bengal..right???though later Mr. Jinnah changed his mind and demanded a separate state(Country) for muslims,but others(Cong and other parties..even revolutionaries too) always fought for a single country...India(Hindustan/Bharat back then)..i never find anyone in history who wanted "Independent Bengal"..
 
.
now now...we fought for Independent India...not Independent Bengal..right???though later Mr. Jinnah changed his mind and demanded a separate state(Country) for muslims,but others(Cong and other parties..even revolutionaries too) always fought for a single country...India(Hindustan/Bharat back then)..i never find anyone in history who wanted "Independent Bengal"..

Well that's what I was talking about. Hindus including W.bengali hindus fought for united India while muslims including Bengali
muslims speared the PAK movement. But Some of our great leaders like AKfazlul haq did proposed a united bengal but that
was rejected by the congress, even Jinnah supported it calling it Bagalistan. That's why fazlul haq and E.bengali muslims
opted for lahore resolution and yes we are proud of our Forefathers for spearheading the PAK movement. I am saying all
this because some delusional awami bigots in my country still thinks that Hindus in the W.bengal would have supported an
independent United bengal, we have a bigot like that here in this forum as well. SO thanks for clearing that up. I know West bengalis are
militantly proud indians and they are justified to be so.
:)


resolution
 
.
Thanks Luffy for exposing the fake Bengali nationalism. For most ignoramus RAWamy fools that drank the fake Bengali nationalism Koolaid or used it is an excuse to break Pakistan and make us a vassal state, the real reason was personal power and money, as they thought they will own Bangladesh with their Indian masters help. They are still trying and have taken our country back many steps, but good thing was that by these long efforts, they have exposed the real RAWamy character of secret Indian control and manipulation. So I think now we can see light at the end of the tunnel. For all fellow Bangladeshi's please talk to your relatives, friends and spread the word, that:

1. Awamy League was created by Indian Intelligence Bureau (before RAW formation in 1968) and still run by RAW
2. Indian intelligence has infiltrated all sectors of our country, admin, media, politics etc.
3. We need to start our real fight for independence to reduce Indian influence so we can finally take our country forward

USA is not a problem for Bangladesh, we had good relations and we will continue to have good relations. It is one of our biggest market for RMG and future market for many products. They give us shelter and a good life, so RAWamy's cannot send their death squads to get us, if we speak up. So USA has been a friend and will remain a friend, but we need to educate USA/West and the whole world about Indian machinations in our country and make sure they do not fall for the false Indian Hindutva propaganda that we have "Islamic terror" brewing in our country, so we have to be under Indian proxy RAWamy League rule, to reign in extremism. I think MUA/FUA coup support from some UN and US quarters had something to do with this kind of view.
 
.
East Bengal was an non existent entity before 1905.East Bengal was created by Lord Curson in 1905 but this decision was quashed by Lord Harding in favour of Linguistic division in 1912.

Your command over history of your own country is pathetic.


The Usage of Old name for Bangladesh proves your Razakar roots.

anonymus , who are you to use the term ' Razakar ' ? It is a political word , widely used by BAL to harass its opposition .
Perhaps you have no idea about Razakar . For your information , Razakars were paramilitary forces who mentally , morally & physically supported Pakistan Army in 1971 . They fight against Mukti Bahini . But now BAL using this word against its political opponents , no matter who is a Muktijudda or not . Every one who opposes Awamileague is a Razakar from Awamileague point of view . Grate freedo fighter Kader Siddiqui , Sheed President Ziaur Rahman , Major Jalil , all are Razakar to BAL , even a 20 years boy who don't support BAL is also a razakar to Awamileague . So this word is a political word widely used by Awamileague , and as an indian you are not authorized to use this word , at least minimum courtesy doesn't support it .
 
.
anonymus , who are you to use the term ' Razakar ' ? It is a political word , widely used by BAL to harass its opposition .
Perhaps you have no idea about Razakar . For your information , Razakars were paramilitary forces who mentally , morally & physically supported Pakistan Army in 1971 . They fight against Mukti Bahini . But now BAL using this word against its political opponents , no matter who is a Muktijudda or not . Every one who opposes Awamileague is a Razakar from Awamileague point of view . Grate freedo fighter Kader Siddiqui , Sheed President Ziaur Rahman , Major Jalil , all are Razakar to BAL , even a 20 years boy who don't support BAL is also a razakar to Awamileague . So this word is a political word widely used by Awamileague , and as an indian you are not authorized to use this word , at least minimum courtesy doesn't support it .

This is because RAWamy League has no brain, their brain is in South Block, so every thing they do is follow instruction from their masters. And RAW spreads the same propaganda in Indian media, as they do in Bangladesh media, that is why they use the same code words, to create emotional effect on victims of 1971 conflict.
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom