What's new

The Great Game Changer: Belt and Road Intiative (BRI; OBOR)

Don't say no.
This is not a bad thing from Russia.
Saying No will destroy friendship.
If this deal is all Russia paid, with additional research funding for China and India,why not?
You are hired to gain technology, why not?
Who invite to the dining, who pay, then thats the best deal. By working together does not mean you need to leak your technology. Just send junior researcher if afraid technology leak.
Can refute only if cost burden too high.
 
.
.
What does India bring to the table?

Money?Technical know-how?Engineering expertise?Curry?

All the above

Actually the OP draws on an Indian news site. Ascribe that to the Indian's new polished sense of accomplishment now that they just got a guest of honor. Have not seen this news on RT or Sputnik International. Hence, it is premature and unprofessional to blame Putin or the Russian Government for the idiotic news. Take the news with a truckload of salt.

Mr. Putin is doing just fine. Saudi King could not have died at a better time. LOL.

Moscow could propose to China and India to create a joint manned orbital station at the summit of the BRICS emerging economies in Russia's Ufa in July," a document drafted by the expert council at Russia's military and industrial commission said today.

Apparently 'Russia's military and industrial commission' is responsible for this & Our news channel was just reporting this,so spare the bashing please

It would make sense that it's from an Indian news site. That's less surprising (and less embarrassing) than if it came directly from the Bear's mouth. :lol:

Apparently 'Russia's military and industrial commission' is to blame,we are just reporting the news
 
.
All the above



Moscow could propose to China and India to create a joint manned orbital station at the summit of the BRICS emerging economies in Russia's Ufa in July," a document drafted by the expert council at Russia's military and industrial commission said today.

Apparently 'Russia's military and industrial commission' is responsible for this & Our news channel was just reporting this,so spare the bashing please



Apparently 'Russia's military and industrial commission' is to blame,we are just reporting the news

That's just sad, if true. It shows Russia is getting desperate - announcing grand sounding projects no one has any intention of participating in.
 
. .
US military and NATO officials expressed their concern over the rise in Russia’s military technologies.


1017475800.jpg

© FLICKR/ ANTONIO C.

WASHINGTON, January 29 (Sputnik) — The United States and NATO are observing rapid improvements in Russia’s military technologies with increased concern, particularly as US technological advantages over potential adversaries decrease, US military and NATO officials said at a Center for a New American Security conference.

“Our [the US] military’s long comfortable technological edge…is steadily eroding,” US Deputy Secretary of Defense Robert Work stated on Wednesday. “We still believe we have a margin, but the margin is steadily eroding and it’s making us nervous.”

Areas of concern for the United States include the advances made by Russia and China in modernizing nuclear weapons, anti-ship and anti-aircraft missiles, long-range strike missiles, as well as counterspace, cyber, electronic warfare, and special operations capabilities, Work said.



1017270861.jpg

© PHOTO: UNITED INSTRUMENT MANUFACTURING CORPORATION

“What gives us all pause is that the military of our potential competitors around the world has been rising since 2001,” the Pentagon official commented, noting that during the same period, military spending by US allies has generally declined.

The past decade’s reversal and growth in Russia’s military spending and force modernization poses a “challenge” to the United States, according to Work, with a “transoceanic and global” force projection.

NATO’s Supreme Allied Commander of Transformation, General Jean-Paul Paloméros stated on Wednesday that the transatlantic alliance is “closely monitoring” Russia’s fielding and development of advanced weapons systems.

General Paloméros referred obliquely to “game-changers” in Russia’s defense arsenal. Such systems, he said, “could deny our access to some strategic part of the alliance, or our ability to deploy our forces where and when it is needed.”

Given the narrowing edge of technological advantage over potential adversaries, NATO is focused on continually assessing how to transform itself “to keep the edge…on those very strategic domains,” the General stated.

Since 2012, Russia has been involved in a substantial military modernization program aimed at improving aging weapons systems and investing in new technologies through 2020, according to Russian official reports.

Over the past four years, Russia’s military expenditures have outpaced those of the United States as a percentage of gross domestic product (GDP), according to World Bank data which showed US expenditures at 3.8 percent of GDP and Russia at 4.2 percent. The rest of the world averages military expenditures at slightly over 2 percent of GDP.
 
.
US military and NATO officials expressed their concern over the rise in Russia’s military technologies.


1017475800.jpg

© FLICKR/ ANTONIO C.

WASHINGTON, January 29 (Sputnik) — The United States and NATO are observing rapid improvements in Russia’s military technologies with increased concern, particularly as US technological advantages over potential adversaries decrease, US military and NATO officials said at a Center for a New American Security conference.

“Our [the US] military’s long comfortable technological edge…is steadily eroding,” US Deputy Secretary of Defense Robert Work stated on Wednesday. “We still believe we have a margin, but the margin is steadily eroding and it’s making us nervous.”

Areas of concern for the United States include the advances made by Russia and China in modernizing nuclear weapons, anti-ship and anti-aircraft missiles, long-range strike missiles, as well as counterspace, cyber, electronic warfare, and special operations capabilities, Work said.



1017270861.jpg

© PHOTO: UNITED INSTRUMENT MANUFACTURING CORPORATION

“What gives us all pause is that the military of our potential competitors around the world has been rising since 2001,” the Pentagon official commented, noting that during the same period, military spending by US allies has generally declined.

The past decade’s reversal and growth in Russia’s military spending and force modernization poses a “challenge” to the United States, according to Work, with a “transoceanic and global” force projection.

NATO’s Supreme Allied Commander of Transformation, General Jean-Paul Paloméros stated on Wednesday that the transatlantic alliance is “closely monitoring” Russia’s fielding and development of advanced weapons systems.

General Paloméros referred obliquely to “game-changers” in Russia’s defense arsenal. Such systems, he said, “could deny our access to some strategic part of the alliance, or our ability to deploy our forces where and when it is needed.”

Given the narrowing edge of technological advantage over potential adversaries, NATO is focused on continually assessing how to transform itself “to keep the edge…on those very strategic domains,” the General stated.

Since 2012, Russia has been involved in a substantial military modernization program aimed at improving aging weapons systems and investing in new technologies through 2020, according to Russian official reports.

Over the past four years, Russia’s military expenditures have outpaced those of the United States as a percentage of gross domestic product (GDP), according to World Bank data which showed US expenditures at 3.8 percent of GDP and Russia at 4.2 percent. The rest of the world averages military expenditures at slightly over 2 percent of GDP.
I love the way the article look at % of GDP instead of the actual money spend.....
 
.
European NATO members aren't spending the required 2% of GDP on their defence. As always they figure that the U.S. will pick up their 'slack'.
 
.
European NATO members aren't spending the required 2% of GDP on their defence. As always they figure that the U.S. will pick up their 'slack'.

lol this is the draw back of being the best military in the world , people start depend on you, as an Australian, i would not want Australia to spend more then now and start putting money in the piggy bank, but as an American, I want China tospend more to catch the gap, only then will the EU wake upand stop depending on American for their defence, its like they are milking US where on one hand they close their base and cut the troop and on the other they ask for more US present in the region.

The Chinese in me swing either way tho
 
.
Perhaps US has submersible air craft carrier by now. Im not expert
 
.
China Supplies Air Defense Systems, Unmanned Aerial Vehicle to Uzbekistan
14:47 02.02.2015(updated 14:49 02.02.2015)

1017650173.jpg


China has supplied its new generation medium- to long-range HQ-9 air defense systems and its percussion unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) Pterodactyl (Yilong-1) to Uzbekistan; similar deliveries have been made to Turkmenistan.

MOSCOW, February 2 (Sputnik) – China has supplied its new generation medium- to long-range HQ-9 air defense systems to Uzbekistan, according to the country’s news website 12news.


Tashkent has also received at least one percussion UAV, the Pterodactyl (Yilong-1), which was developed by China's Chengdu Aircraft Industry Group.

Similar deliveries have been made to Turkmenistan, the website quotes Chinese newspaper "Huantsyu Shibao" as saying.

The contracts for the provision of defense equipment to these Central Asian countries were signed back in 2013.

The purpose of delivering weaponry to the countries is to reduce the price China has to pay them for natural gas, according to WantChinaTimes, a news website operated by The China Times group.


1017649548.jpg
 
.
Did Uzbekistan and Turkmenistan buy Chinese HQ-9 to circumvent Russian IFF?

During the Russian-Chechen war, the Chechens were shocked to discover that captured AAA guns would not fire on Russian fighters. The Russian fighters were broadcasting IFF (ie. Identification Friend or Foe). Russian AAA guns cannot be fired against a Russian fighter with an activated IFF beacon.

Uzbekistan and Turkmenistan have watched the Russian encroachment into former Soviet Republics (e.g. Georgia, Crimea, and Ukraine). Uzbekistan and Turkmenistan would not buy Russian S-300s, which are useless against a Russian fighter with IFF.

Thus, Uzbekistan and Turkmenistan probably purchased Chinese HQ-9s to safeguard their airspace.
 
. .
Has the US become so poor that we have to pay for your adventures? :lol:

You can't take care of your own money. The E.U. is near collapse. You'll be going down on Vladi like a two dollar whore when he rattles the gas pipes a little.:rofl:
 
.
You can't take care of your own money. The E.U. is near collapse. You'll be going down on Vladi like a two dollar whore when he rattles the gas pipes a little.:rofl:

Russia can give us all we need (all kinds of resources) and we can give her all she needs (high class consumer products), while the US is using our so called elite as some cheap whores. Without the military, your dollars would be worth less than used toilet papers.

BTW, you are a mere slave of your own oligarchy. :)
 
.
Back
Top Bottom