Okemos
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2013
- Messages
- 883
- Reaction score
- 0
So, you come up with a hypothesis on the writer behalf? I search through the article, and I did not find the word exodus anywhere.
Besides the 100 millions that was mentioned twice, one in the conclusion of the article, there is also a figure of 48 millions that is total no. of Chinese diaspora.
So in China thousand years old history, 48 millions of Chinese ethnicity are living oversea, that is about 3-4%, BIG DEAL.
The writer also lump immigration, people that get PR as an potential option, studying oversea, and tourism together with the word exodus, that is sensationalist journalism.
It is just an excuse to take a dig at China, we have seen enough to know what it is.
During the Chinese spring festival, which is the most important festival in China, people travel home to be with their family. Every year, during that period, there are about 2 billion passenger-journey since 2006.
It is the largest annual human migration in the world.
If you read the article carefully, this article is more like China threat, esp. with the ending like 10 million people are coming to get you.
The title of the article is "The Great Chinese Exodus"
Reference: http://online.wsj.com/articles/the-great-chinese-exodus-1408120906
It is in my opinion, in regards to the author's premise, that the Chinese people are not foreign to the notion of looking for greener pastures, even if these pastures are ...foreign lands. The author's emphasis of the migratory patterns abroad is indicative of eventual proclivity to migrate permanently due to exposure of the West's resources and demographic opportunities. I think the author's opinion carries weight considering that even in the United States, the most numerous Asian ethnic group are -- Chinese.
I think the most numerous ethnic group in the new world are Europeans, so I guess the Europeans are not foreign to the notion of looking for greener pastures, even if these pastures are ...foreign lands. The author's emphasis of the migratory patterns abroad is indicative of eventual proclivity to migrate permanently due to exposure of the new world's resources and demographic opportunities.
I think a tiny Mexico has more immigrants in the U.S. than Chinese with 1.4b population, a tiny Vietnam, Korea and Philipines have about 1/3-2/3 of Chinese immigrants. I don't think the author's opinion carries weight. And I have done too much thinking this evening already. lol
Last edited: