AgNoStiC MuSliM
ADVISORS
- Joined
- Jul 11, 2007
- Messages
- 25,259
- Reaction score
- 87
- Country
- Location
You seem to have a point here Xeric. So India is not wanted in Kashmir and should move out to save itself further painful consequences. By that token my friend, Pakistan is not wanted in Balochistan. Pakistan is not wanted in Afghanistan. And Pakistan is most definitely not wanted in Waziristan, all along your NWFP, and FATA. And now you may add your Punjab to the list also apparently. So stop fingering and save yourself broken teeth. Give in to the TTP and BLA. Respect Afghan claims on territory you hold. Leave those damn places brother. Show us unintelligent and illogical Indians how its done. Move out.
Bad analogies - all of the territories mentioned in your post became part of Pakistan through one sort of representative process or another, under the rules of partition.
The accession of Princely States was subject to plebiscite under the rules of partition, a point endorsed by the UNSC in its resolutions on Kashmir, and accepted by both India and Pakistan. India carried out a plebiscite in Junagadh after invading it despite the accession of the State to Pakistan - that plebiscite has not yet been honored in J&K, which makes the accession incomplete, and which means the rights of the people of the State remain suspended and violated.
That is the basis on which 'India should move out', not necessarily literally, but in allowing the Kashmiris to determine their own destiny.
If we are going to drag in any territory that is inflicted by violence in a nation into this discussion, then India would have to break up into a dozen or so pieces.
Last edited: