Dalit
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2012
- Messages
- 23,669
- Reaction score
- -12
- Country
- Location
I was looking for realistic options. Su-35 is unavailable. J-20 and J-16 are unavailable too.
So there's J-10... which has not been given export clearance. This is from 2013, but still relevant even today.
J-10 fighter not yet approved for export - People's Daily Online
There is no way of knowing when the J-10 will get export clearance. That leaves only the F-16 for now as far as I can see.
Rafale is not very expensive on a per aircraft basis. The customized version with a new engine costs only $85M, about $20M more than a HAL manufactured Su-30. After upgrades, the MKI will get much more expensive than the Rafale. Let me lay it out here so there are no confusions. This is just to show what's happening in India right now. Rafale is expensive mainly because we plan to buy over 200 of them in a short time. So, the volumes make it expensive. Apart from 200+ Rafales, there is a high chance the IAF will purchase 100-150 Gripen NGs/F-16s/SH, whoever wins the second MMRCA program. EFT's in it too, but has no chance. There will be parallel production lines.
But let's avoid what India is doing, you can follow the Rafale thread for more information. I just want the topic to stay on what Pakistan is up to in order to challenge the IAF's massive buildup. I want a genuine discussion.
Information came from halloweene- A USAF pilot admitted that the Rafale had superior networking and situational awareness compared to the F-22.
The F-22 is the aircraft that the Australian Air Force claimed had situational awareness beyond compare on oath in the Australian Parliament.
Rafale was the only aircraft to fly over a S-300 unharmed in all of Euro-NATO all by itself. Rafale was the only aircraft that entered Libya well before SEAD/DEAD missions began.
The cost of maintaining a Rafale is $2.4M in France. If the cost is the same in India, then for 200 Rafales, it will cost just $480M a year. That's peanuts because by the time we have 200, India's defence budget will be far too big in comparison. It will be akin to maintaining a tiny fleet of trainers. Please do not discuss India. I hope we only talk about PAF and its options.
LOL so India acquired the Rafale due to one American pilot claiming that this fighter has a better "networking" and "situational awareness" compared to the 5th gen beast known as the F-22? Are you even serious? I'm not even going to waste my breath on this ludicrous claim.
The Rafale has never ever faced a worthy adversary. You know this and I know this. All your claims are just that. Who cares what missions this plane has flown in Libya or Timbuktu for that matter? LOL Libya is hardly a gauge for any plane to be judged on its capabilities and performance. Let it fly and test its metal against a worthy opponent and we'll talk further.
Rubbish. The maintenance cost is humungous and India will be acquiring many more which would also increase the cost manifold. Not only that, include all other current planes as well as future acquisitions and you know that this is just a logistical nightmare. India hasn't got the credentials as far as logistics is concerned.
Last edited: